Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The Holocene Deniers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="grmorton" data-source="post: 53056821" data-attributes="member: 85112"><p>I have some things I need to get done for a couple of days and it would probably be good to let tempers cool a bit anyway. </p><p> </p><p>I want to say something to my critics here. I have two guys who read my blog, which has much of the same info I post here. One is a physicist for IBM and he started out extremely skeptical of my data. He just emailed me last week saying that he finally agrees with me that one can't use the thermometer data to know what the world temperature is doing. His opinion means a lot more to me than that of anyone here.</p><p> </p><p>The second guy who emails me, commenting on my blog reads it whenever I post a new thread. He is a former chairman of a department of statistics at a major US university. He has never had a problem over the years of our correspondence in telling me he thinks I am wrong. He reads what I write on my blog, much the same as the stuff I post here. Not once has he said that my statistics was flawed. I value his opinion being having been a chairman of the statistics department far more than the stuff put out here by a couple of rank amateurs (one of whom likes to post pictures of hair).</p><p> </p><p>Now, I have said that I would stay as long as it took to give people here the data. I have come to wonder if there IS anyone here who cares about what I am posting. I have no illusions and never had any that I would convince the unconvinceable about global warming. My purpose has never been to convince thau or Gracchus or any of the believers. My purpose has always been to give those who want some counter information that information. If there are those who care about the data I will stick around.</p><p> </p><p>I see little reason to stay if I am talking merely to Thau and thugs. That would be a huge waste of time. So, if there is anyone who likes what I have been posting and would like to see more, please speak up (unlike the snobs who think that YECs are not real people, I don't care what your background is because data is the only thing that matters to me.). If there is no one, then I probably will throw in the towel here. </p><p> </p><p>I am very disappointed in Thaumaturgy, who doesn't have the manhood to publically acknowlegde the simple fact that he was the first one in this thread to raise my qualifications. I find that to be most disturbing about him because it says he has no honor and is no gentleman. It says he is dishonest.</p><p> </p><p>Back in a couple of days if anyone here cares.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="grmorton, post: 53056821, member: 85112"] I have some things I need to get done for a couple of days and it would probably be good to let tempers cool a bit anyway. I want to say something to my critics here. I have two guys who read my blog, which has much of the same info I post here. One is a physicist for IBM and he started out extremely skeptical of my data. He just emailed me last week saying that he finally agrees with me that one can't use the thermometer data to know what the world temperature is doing. His opinion means a lot more to me than that of anyone here. The second guy who emails me, commenting on my blog reads it whenever I post a new thread. He is a former chairman of a department of statistics at a major US university. He has never had a problem over the years of our correspondence in telling me he thinks I am wrong. He reads what I write on my blog, much the same as the stuff I post here. Not once has he said that my statistics was flawed. I value his opinion being having been a chairman of the statistics department far more than the stuff put out here by a couple of rank amateurs (one of whom likes to post pictures of hair). Now, I have said that I would stay as long as it took to give people here the data. I have come to wonder if there IS anyone here who cares about what I am posting. I have no illusions and never had any that I would convince the unconvinceable about global warming. My purpose has never been to convince thau or Gracchus or any of the believers. My purpose has always been to give those who want some counter information that information. If there are those who care about the data I will stick around. I see little reason to stay if I am talking merely to Thau and thugs. That would be a huge waste of time. So, if there is anyone who likes what I have been posting and would like to see more, please speak up (unlike the snobs who think that YECs are not real people, I don't care what your background is because data is the only thing that matters to me.). If there is no one, then I probably will throw in the towel here. I am very disappointed in Thaumaturgy, who doesn't have the manhood to publically acknowlegde the simple fact that he was the first one in this thread to raise my qualifications. I find that to be most disturbing about him because it says he has no honor and is no gentleman. It says he is dishonest. Back in a couple of days if anyone here cares. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The Holocene Deniers
Top
Bottom