• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Fossil Record Proves Speciation, Not Evolution of Lifeforms Observed

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Yes, but your argumets are to be frank, not scientific, they are religious built on misunderstanding science and misrepresenting articles. You only debate because the ToE doesnt jive with your religiosus faith.

Your conclusion is drawn before you view the data and facts.
 
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Many do not understand how something in the biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true if there are no fossil record details between lifeforms that shows evolution never happened.

There are zero fossils that shows step by step morphological changes between lifeforms to prove evolution has occurred. Zero.

The best evolutionist have are macro-collections of fitted fossil sequences, that do not have the morphologically detailed fossils between the said lifeforms. Evolutionists utilize conjecture to conclude macro-assemblages have scientific validity.

All biochemical and biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true without fossil record evidence showing evolution actually happened.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,251
10,149
✟285,261.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Many do not understand how something in the biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true if there are no fossil record details between lifeforms that shows evolution never happened.
Still waiting for you to respond to my question regarding the increase of complexity in ammonites through the Mezozoic, an instance that directly refutes your claim. This is my sixth or seventh request that you address this issue. Your continued non-response is rude and contrary to the spirit of this forum. Please respond.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Word salad.

Learn some basic science if you want to debate.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,991
1,736
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟321,123.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Explain how they are religious and not scientific.
 
Reactions: Heissonear
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.
 
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,251
10,149
✟285,261.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.
You are almost certainly correct, however, by periodic reminders I give him a chance to restore his integrity, or to continue to injure it. He entitled to believe that evolutionary theory is incorrect. He is not entitled to peddle silly assertions about the evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.
Maybe your bungy was a bit too long the last time you went out.

Read the title of this thread and topic.

Fossil record and only proof of Species, no morphologically detailed sequences of fossils between lifeforms that shows evolution has occurred.

Are you not facing up to this reality?
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not till you respond to my reiterated request:

Please present the detailed fossils that clearly show morphological changes between two different lifeforms where one lifeform step by step changed into another lifeform over time.

If you do not present such fossils, then what will follow is you present evolution based on conjecture.

And replies will follow of where you stand in promoting evolution.
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Funny that. I gave an example of what you claim doesn't exist in an earlier post and said you'd handwave, deny or ignore the evidence. Looks like I was right - you've ignored it. Again.

Why do so many creationists have to rely on dishonesty? Is it, by any chance, that your position is so untenable that honesty would bring it crashing down? And I'd like an honest answer to this question.
 
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0