Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Stop insinuating Biology is the same as evolution.
neither can you. Your own theory changes every day with new theories put forth every day. Stop making excuses and accept reality.....
If you're harping about our differences, do you embrace our agreements?Reminds me of this joke: http://justjokey.com/they-think-theyre-the-only-ones-here/
See, you can't even admit your own errors. You insinuated I was insinuating biology was wrong.... I have never once insinuated that. Not once in any single post I have ever posted. It is YOU that therefore confused evolution theory with actual biological science, since you believed I was insinuating biology was wrong..... Don't you evolutionists ever get tired of presenting strawmen and falsehoods?I didn't. You did.
Taxonomy isn't a science either, since it has no real scientific definition to work from..Again, you're the one making a big deal over definitions of "species". And apparently don't even know enough to understand that species definitions apply to all of biology. Taxonomy isn't exclusive to evolution.
You're confusing figuring out the minutiae in modern science with the radically different variations of creationist beliefs.
For example, creationists can't even agree on how old the planet is. Is it 4.5 billion years? 6000 years? 12000 years? Something else entirely? Those aren't small margins of error we're talking about and have consequences with respect to the whole history of the planet.
You're not going to find that level of disagreement in modern science.
It shows that, in the fossil record, depth doesn't mean non-coexistence.
Seems you didn't pay much attention to your own thread.
Post #122, page 7.
Not going to keep repeating things every 5 pages because you can't read.
Aman has it sort of right, except the OP shows his lack of knowledge by stating that animals just die and then sit around on the surface and turn into fossils without decaying. He seems to lack any actual knowledge that fossils require immediate rapid burial (in a sedimentary layer that hardens quickly due to the bacteria, the oxygen replaced with hydrogen) so that they do not start decomposing. Which is why you do not find them today. It takes a catastrophic event from underground water tables bringing those abundant bacteria to the surface and mixing them with the sediment brought up, then the oxygen is replaced by the hydrogen. This prevents surface bacteria which live on organic material using oxygen as a catalyst from decomposing them....
Ruin/restoration explains it better than evolution. It's the suddenness and completeness of the change in the geologic column that eliminates the possibility of evolution. Evolution implies gradual uninterrupted change. The evidence of sudden cataclysm seen in the geologic record denies this possibility.
Taxonomy isn't a science either, since it has no real scientific definition to work from..
So if it is a big deal a verse can be interpreted many ways, then it is a big deal species can be interpreted many ways.
Right. You forget I am much older.
When I was growing up the universe was 2 billion years old, then 4 billion, then 8 billion, then 12 billion, now it's 13.7 billion. When the James Webb telescope comes online they will upgrade that to 20 billion.... or more....
Not inconsequential numbers or small margins of errors at all......
Let us not forget that this is the creationist genius that declared that 'vocalizations' such as when you stub your toe or something are caused by "the gut" sending motor impulses via the recurrent laryngeal nerve directly to the larynx...So, where did you get your PhD from? How many fossil digs have you been on? I'm sure those are silly questions since you obviously have the academic background and tons of experience with fossils and are well known in paleontological circles since you know so much more than all those so-called "experts."
Right?
One can see that YOU did not support them in any way.Can you refute my assertions?
Unless, of course, the discussion is involves:What an attitude. Why bother going to optician to sort out your eyes?? They've only been studying their chosen profession for like forever.
The list could go on and on. Just what is the point in anybody dedicating their lives to the study of a subject. Might as well just use the local postman to sort out that tumour in your brain. Ridiculous!!!
Yeah, well, except for, you know, those mass extinction events...It seems that creatures were able to continue to evolve uninterrupted throughout incredibly destructive cataclysmic environmental events. Of course this ability has been conveniently lost, as during such events today.........they die.
How?It clearly refutes the notion of creation.
We don't.Question - why do so many creationists think they know more than they really do?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?