Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How 'bout we just quote the Bible and let it go at that?
This is why Jesus needs to come back and sync everything, isn't it?This is why I tend to view creationism as Christian fan fiction. With every creationist making up their own story.
Well either He does, or He doesn't, pitabread.Sure, whatever.
Once again, what's the point of this thread?
AMEN!Mat 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved:
I'm just happy, with all the idiots around the world in charge, to know that Jesus will return to keep us all from being destroyed. Amen?
Except nobody does "let it go at that". There's always more.
This is why I tend to view creationism as Christian fan fiction. With every creationist making up their own story.
Really?
So now you are goping to explain what parts of my OP was addressed by it because you really should explain that, it completely escapes me. So, exactly refer to the individual parts of my contentions, relate it to what you wrote "twice" and elaborate exactly what part of what I wrote was addressed by that and why.
For your conveniency:
And that's only a very tiny part of what I wrote. DON'T worry, i will come back to those inevitably.
- the process of fossilizations is not relevant because we do have fossils sitting in the rocks. My Op is about the fossils that are already there sitting and the story they tell.
- the fossil record of geological formation A differs demonstrably from the biodiversity found in geological formation B. Example: in the geological formatioins of the Ediacaran we observe the typical Ediacaran biota. Nothing of the Ediacran biota was left after the Ediacaran-Cambrian mass extinction event. Because in none of the thousands post-Ediacaran paleontological site worldwide we literally can't find not even one single specimen of Ediacran fossil. On the other hand, in the Ediacaran we literally won't find not even one single specimen of the following major groups of extant life: arthropods (spiders, insects, crustaceans and the like), fish, plants, amphibians, reptiles, dinosaurs, birds, mammals. The fossils of these major groups of organisms are entirely lacking in the Ediacran formations, not one single specimen in any of the dozens of Ediacaran sites we have worldwide.
- the more distant formation A is situated in the geological from formation B, the larger the differences in biodiversity.
Not only are you a habitual deceiver but you also seem to have severe reasoning problems.
This terrible post is full of complete nonsense and blab and tattle.
But, anyway: my OP please.
It fascinates me how every creationist on this forum seems to have their own private theology.
Is that how Christianity works? Everyone gets to make up their own version?
As it fascinates me how every evolutionist on this forum has their own theory of how things evolved....
You can't even give me a scientific definition of species that you all agree on, then want to discuss speciation and which animals are separate species
Once again, what's the point of this thread?
It's some guy who wants to tell others how smart he is about fossils. His message is so boring it is surpassed only by the Trump like nature of the nastiness of the OP.
Wouldn't you like Him to come back and set us straight?
Please, you've had the definitions of species explained to you countless times of this forum. You're just arguing a strawman.
It also comes across as more than a little desperate if *this* is the type of thing you think is an indictment of science. After all, a species is just a label we slap on groups of organisms to make categorization easier. And there is no singular definition which neatly divides all organisms (kinda contrary to what we might expect if creationism were true, in fact).
So you have a problem with the fact there are multiple ways to define species? That's your big criticism? You're clutching at straws.
Except that's the problem. If you actually had a consistent scientific definition, like every other real science has for their science definitions, their would be a neat division of all organisms.
Clutching at straws?
On the contrary. I am not insinuating anything. I am stating as fact that evolution isn't a real science. Nothing was said about biology.... That's your straw man....Once again you're back to insinuating that biology isn't a "real science".
Says the man that refuses to understand that Hebrew words often mean different things, even entire phrases, based on surrounding context, arguing against defining words differently, while at the same time arguing for defining a single word in multiple ways. But your right, I should have used the word hypocrisy.....Yes, you are clutching at straws. Good luck with that.
I am stating as fact that evolution isn't a real science. Nothing was said about biology.... That's your straw man....
Says the man that refuses to understand that Hebrew words often mean different things, even entire phrases, based on surrounding context, arguing against defining words differently, while at the same time arguing for defining a single word in multiple ways. But your right, I should have used the word hypocrisy.....
See above....Definitions of species is used in all of biology, not just related to evolution. So if you're claiming that not having a singular definition makes it not a real science, then you're talking about all of biology.
It's a dumb claim though, so I can understand if you want to back-peddle from it.
neither can you. Your own theory changes every day with new theories put forth every day. Stop making excuses and accept reality.....I'm talking about the fact that creationists can't agree on even the basic history of our planet. Forget Bible interpretation, you guys have bigger issues if you have no way to independently verify your ideas. A
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?