Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,038
- 7,403
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
of course not, because its falsify your claim.
true. so order by itself prove nothing. right?
But you see, in biology, we do NOT 'just put things' in a hierarchy.no. i just showed that puting things in hierarchy doesnt prove they evolved from each other.
The best way to put God back in the schools is to teach the kids that they aren't the "little angels" that they, their parents and teachers constantly lead them to believe they are. Place the moral onus on them to behave like decent human beings, sit down, shut up, and engage with the teacher to learn what is being taught. Also point out that many of them will fail, die young, go to jail, go nuts, fall into poverty, get or get someone pregnant out of wedlock, etc, etc, etc, just as every 'class' before them has done. And that they will likely become victims of the 'world' because of their own greed and stupidity long before any of them bring meaningful change to it.
That would be a good start.
Most of the worst-behaved kids I know are proud and vocal Christians.
true. so order by itself prove nothing. right?
In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.(Only just spotted this as I've got xianghua on ignore.)
No xianghua, nothing like that.
Seriously, what is wrong with you?
You are responding to my post that shows a smooth, gradual transition of fossils. Are you suggesting that your image shows the same thing? Do you think that the truck is the ancestor of the small van?!?! That it evolved from the small van via a process analogous to biological evolution? That is one of the stupidest things I have read on these forums and a timely reminder of why you're on ignore.
Goodbye.
Certainly. As soon as you show me a self-replicating Chevy which reproduces with heritable variation.Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes.
In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.
Zero means zero.
The fossil record does not show evolution ever happened. The very physical evidence to prove evolution scientifically does not exist.
The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes into a new lifeform morphologically distinct and adapted to its natural surroundings.
Zero natural process exist for evolution.
The position of evolutionists is now like stating nature evolves mopeds into Harley's, VW's into Porsche's, lawnmowere into farm tractors, pickup trucks into semi's. The list goes on. There are no natural processes nor pathways of "equipment evolving".
The same is true with lifeforms past and present - no natural processes nor pathways of "complex lifeforms evolving."
Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes. You know, a process where over time into a more complex higher equipment-form.
The Tree of Life has zero fossil record evidence inbetween all speculative from this to that lifeform hierarchy.
Evolution and its cartoon images have no physical proof in fossil record. This is a fact evolutionists are not wanting to acknowledge nor accept.
In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.
Zero means zero.
The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes
Zero natural process exist for evolution.
Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes.
Are you unwilling to face the glaring fact that out of billions of fossils there are no sequence of fossils unearthed showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time?But I think we can all agree there are transitional forms that show common features between one lifeform and another. Take Tikktallik for instance.
Indeed we do see life change in the largest aspects over time. We never find rabbit fossils in Cambrian strata, we don't find any mammals there. We never find human bones in with dinosaurs. We do however find that birds appear to have come out of dinosaurs and share many features common.
So are you saying that maladaptive traits that would keep something from reproducing carry forward in life forms? How does that work?
That's surprising because the processes are basically a reproducing life form in an environment that can kill things. It would seem extremely simple to suggest how that could result in evolution.
Where are all these self-reproducing cars and trucks? I thought they came from a factory. Is there a farm somewhere?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?