Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Go to that site, and hold down your control key, then press "f". You'll find a window pop up (a bar if you're using firefox) type in your screen name, and hit "find" (firefox will find it automatically). You've got two quotes in there.Say what???
Go to that site, and hold down your control key, then press "f". You'll find a window pop up (a bar if you're using firefox) type in your screen name, and hit "find" (firefox will find it automatically). You've got two quotes in there.
Me said:If your original Hebrew disagrees with my original King James --- your original Hebrew is wrong. If your original Hebrew agrees with my original King James, your original Hebrew is right.
So are you claiming that the King James Version of the Bible is a 100% infallible translation? If so, on what grounds?Thank you, Kid, for showing me that.
Wow, folks! Look what the cat (fsfsb - or whatever it's called) dug up!
I remember that conversation from some time ago. I believe we were discussing how you can tell if a document was genuine or not; and I said that the way to do it is to compare it to the King James Bible. If it doesn't agree, it's wrong.
For example - if a phonebook says my phone number is 555-5555, and someone says that his phonebook, written in what he thinks is the original Hebrew, says it's 444-4444, I promise you, my phonebook will trump his any day.
He needs to find the original, original phonebook with 555-5555 in it, or his phonebook is not genuine.
I remember that conversation from some time ago. I believe we were discussing how you can tell if a document was genuine or not; and I said that the way to do it is to compare it to the King James Bible. If it doesn't agree, it's wrong.
For example - if a phonebook says my phone number is 555-5555, and someone says that his phonebook, written in what he thinks is the original Hebrew, says it's 444-4444, I promise you, my phonebook will trump his any day.
He needs to find the original, original phonebook with 555-5555 in it, or his phonebook is not genuine.
Me said:"There are a lot of things I have concluded to be wrong, without studying them in-depth. Evolution is one of them. The fact that I don't know that much about it does not bother me in the least."
Ah, so you're the one with the Law named after him? 'tis an honor.And I'm curious about when King James became the ultimate arbiter of truth and accuracy?
You would be assuming that the phone number is actually 555-5555.Thank you, Kid, for showing me that.
Wow, folks! Look what the cat (fsfsb - or whatever it's called) dug up!
I remember that conversation from some time ago. I believe we were discussing how you can tell if a document was genuine or not; and I said that the way to do it is to compare it to the King James Bible. If it doesn't agree, it's wrong.
For example - if a phonebook says my phone number is 555-5555, and someone says that his phonebook, written in what he thinks is the original Hebrew, says it's 444-4444, I promise you, my phonebook will trump his any day.
He needs to find the original, original phonebook with 555-5555 in it, or his phonebook is not genuine.
The "Famous" comment was a joke. As for the fact that you don't know anything about evolution, how do you know that the Bible contradicts it?LOL --- I guess this is the other one:
I don't know squat about Evolution, I just know the very first chapter of the Bible trumps it.
If these make me "famous," then I guess fame comes cheap nowadays, eh?
Do you have any objective sources (this would rule out the bible) that stated that Jesus had supernatural powers?
The "Famous" comment was a joke. As for the fact that you don't know anything about evolution, how do you know that the Bible contradicts it?
Furthermre, how do you know the bible to be true?
So are you claiming that the King James Version of the Bible is a 100% infallible translation? If so, on what grounds?
And I'm curious about when King James became the ultimate arbiter of truth and accuracy?
It has seven predecessors, five of which are nearly word-for-word copies of itself. They are as follows:
These show a fulfillment of what God said:
- AV1611 King James Version
- AV1587 Geneva Bible
- AV1568 Bishop's Bible
- AV1526 Tyndale Version
- AV1389 Wycliffe Version
- AV700 Anglo-Saxon Version
- AV350 Gothic Version
- AV100 Koine Greek Version
[bible]Psalm 12:6-7[/bible]
I'm sure that at one time the Hebrew Scriptures said the same things these Authorized Versions say - (since they came from the same Source) - specifically the autographs - (very words of the human authors in their handwriting).
So how exactly is a translation equal to a purification?It has seven predecessors, five of which are nearly word-for-word copies of itself. They are as follows:These show a fulfillment of what God said:
- AV1611 King James Version
- AV1587 Geneva Bible
- AV1568 Bishop's Bible
- AV1526 Tyndale Version
- AV1389 Wycliffe Version
- AV700 Anglo-Saxon Version
- AV350 Gothic Version
- AV100 Koine Greek Version
[bible]Psalm 12:6-7[/bible]
I'm sure that at one time the Hebrew Scriptures said the same things these Authorized Versions say - (since they came from the same Source) - specifically the autographs - (very words of the human authors in their handwriting).
When God put His stamp of approval on his translation.
Ah, so you're the one with the Law named after him? 'tis an honor.
And where did he do this?When God put His stamp of approval on his translation.
Ah, so you're the one with the Law named after him?
'tis an honor.
Not really, seeing as if one can take the Bible to be a valid source, we can take the Iliad to be a valid source as well. We should start worshiping Zeus immediately.Anything useful you can say about Jesus is in the Bible. Your question is pointless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?