I usually consider myself quite diplomatic when it comes to VC/EO relations. I think that often our differences are blown out of proportion and, while I will agree with the Orthodox point of view on such and such an issue, I don't see most of our disagreements as reason for division. I also, like many Orthodox, have no problem learning from and respecting western apparitions.
But one thing that does bother me are the Fatima prophesies. The second one goes as follows:
One other thing, I have met several serious Catholics who have told me that a Catholic does not have to accept the prophesies of Fatima (and one of these friend's of mine do not). Is this true? I point this out because even if there do appear to be discepancies to my feeble mind, it in no way undermines the Catholic Church and her validity in my mind.
I'm looking forward to your responses and am not looking to debate. If any follow-up questions looks more like a rebuttle than honest inquiry, forgive me and feel free to delete it.
God bless,
John
But one thing that does bother me are the Fatima prophesies. The second one goes as follows:
Now, some moderate Catholics might say that since this happened during the communist years, the circumstances were much different and now, that many are going back to the Orthodox Church, this is being fulfilled. But I have a feeling this is not the general view of the Catholic Church regarding the prophesy. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this probably refer to bringing Russia under the Pope? If this is true, wouldn't it be not only the God-given right but also the duty of the Vatican to proselytize Orthodox Christians to the Vatican as they have been accused of? But the Vatican vehemently denies this.Second prophesy in Fatima said:When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays [of each month]. If My requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated.
Oddly enough this perhaps bothers me more than anything else. It is very possible I don't understand what is meant by "peace." I suppose I'm taking it to mean worldly peace. Is this right or not? If so, it bothers me because I don't feel that Christianity is about bringing peace to the Earth necessarily. This is not the purpose of our Faith, but rather the salvation of souls. The Biblical prophesies talk about anything BUT peace towards the end. Then again, I am no end-times specialist and it may be that I am misuderstanding what was meant by this.... And there will be peace...
One other thing, I have met several serious Catholics who have told me that a Catholic does not have to accept the prophesies of Fatima (and one of these friend's of mine do not). Is this true? I point this out because even if there do appear to be discepancies to my feeble mind, it in no way undermines the Catholic Church and her validity in my mind.
I'm looking forward to your responses and am not looking to debate. If any follow-up questions looks more like a rebuttle than honest inquiry, forgive me and feel free to delete it.
God bless,
John