Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And yet use none if it upon which to base teaching people must use inly the hebrew form of the name.. HmmI refer to the word, doctrine, and traditions of Christ and the Apostles brother, as that is the Lord's truth.
God bless and God you to the truth of his word brother
In short... The congregation has been influenced and infiltrated by these false doctrines .albeit your polite defense of it .I am a member of a evangelical charismatic church within which a few of us have taken a look at our Hebrew roots for general edification. For me, the blessing has primarily been that I have found in it an authentification of my trust in the Lord Jesus to get me beyond the grips of Higher Criticism. As a result, I am more assured that the original Scriptures (whether Hebrew for the OT or Greek for the NT) were 100% accurate in their original take. My pastor is not "HR" in any movement sense, but for emphasis, and to give OT references a sense of immediacy and "you were there", he will say names of God, people and places in the Hebrew/Greek way.
So, congregation at-large, all of us understand that we have been grafted into believing Israel. Some HRers wear a prayer shawl to services as a sign of dedication and not for show. I like to take the standard OT (Parasha) readings for the Jewish Sabbath and read them along with the recommended NT readings outlined by Stern in the Complete Jewish Bible. Still, I use the NKJV, NASB and Spanish Reina-Valera for general reading.
I believe certain thoughts must be concurrently accepted: (1) that the original scriptures came in specific languages, making the transmission of them the most accurate for reference, (2) that God intended for the Scriptures (old/new) to be spread via translation. In the latter, there certainly is a degree of trust placed on the Holy Spirit to guide interpreters (I have no problem with that, because I have seen more truth being communicated by preachers of the Gospel in Spanish than by liberal theologian well-versed in Hebrew/Greek). I wonder if St. Paul anticipated translation issues when he admonished that not many should be teachers. And all this does make me ponder that perhaps it is a degree of uniform liturgy and sacraments (are those ever debated on CF!) that allows original intent to stick despite translation.
There is a hardcore HR para-church group that meets in my city, about all gentiles. They are outstanding believers and go out of their way to not undermine their very "gentile minded" pastors. I was interested until I understood that there is among them a line of reasoning that says we can understand the NT better if we study the OT via the teachings of extra-biblical teachings of rabbis--then, this would make us better hearers of the Word expressed in the NT. The jury is not out for me on this, as I can see some validity in this as far as understanding custom and context, while it still strikes me that there is is a very fine line that might even cause one to sway away from the Root of Jesse into the speculations that Paul cautioned us about. But, the jury might say that studying those rabbis some, with a seeking heart and discerning spirit, is like archeology. Even the stones can tell us things that affirm and even elucidate on the scriptures.
Wrong as usual. Unlike you I did not give my opinion, I quoted from Brown, Driver, Briggs Hebrew lexicon and the Jewish Encyclopedia which you blew off because you think Strong's is more accurate.And I am not interested in your opinion on the sources I have provided. Only proof directly from the word of God that shows his name to be anything other than Yahshua. He came in the Lord's name Yah, not in the Lord's name Jesus.
I don't need any more false information on the the name of the Savior.If you want more information on the name Yahshua you can check out this link and then I would ask that you seek out others for yourself.
I do not agree with everything believed by these people but I do agree with their explanation(for the most part) of how the name was changed and how we know the true name is Yahshua.
Well brother you came into this discussion with a mindset not to believe anything brought to you, there are dozens of sites and sources you could look to that prove the Lord's name is Yahshua and Not Jesus(not just one guy but thousands of people and scholars with decades of research and study). But you do not want to do that, you have already made up your mind on the matter. So this is where I leave you.I don't need any more false information on the the name of the Savior.
I went to your link and I found NOTHING which shows the pronunciation of ישןע is Yahshua. As I said the Masoretes added vowel points to the Hebrew and they pointed ישןע as Yeshua. All you got is some anonymous guy with a phony name online claiming only he has the true, truth and everybody else is wrong.
You claimed that because Jesus said He came in the name of the Lord His name should be Yahshua. But hold on a minute.
1 Samuel 17:45 Then said David to the Philistine, Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield: but I come to thee in the name of the LORD of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied.When the shepherd boy came to the giant Goliath "in the name of the Lord" did his name change to Yahweh?
I have shown this several times now brother. Nowhere in scripture do we see the Lord giving us permission to change his name to just a common name held by many other people(even during christ's time)And yet use none if it upon which to base teaching people must use inly the hebrew form of the name.. Hmm
I have shown this several times now brother. Nowhere in scripture do we see the Lord giving us permission to change his name to just a common name held by many other people(even during christ's time)
Here are the verses again brother you may have missed them.
"The true name of Christ is said to be very very very important, the bible does not in any way fail to stress the importance of the Son's name.
Here are some of the passages that state the Importance of this one name given by God for man to be saved.
Acts 4:10-12
Matt 28:18-20
Acts 10:48'
Ephesians 1:21
Acts 2:38
Acts 19:5
John 3:18
Romans 10:13
Acts 2:21
Zech 13:9
Romans 10:9
The name of God is important, more important than getting any other name on earth correct. Why you do not see the importance of getting the one given by God that brings salvation correct I do not understand.
John 5:43"
<SD>Well brother you came into this discussion with a mindset not to believe anything brought to you, there are dozens of sites and sources you could look to that prove the Lord's name is Yahshua and Not Jesus(not just one guy but thousands of people and scholars with decades of research and study). But you do not want to do that, you have already made up your mind on the matter. So this is where I leave you.anfang
The same thing can be said about you and other sacred namers. But I come to this discussion with graduate study in the Biblical languages and more than 5 decades of of study, teaching and preaching.ende
As soon as you show me clear and convincing, credible, verifiable, historical etc. evidence that the name of the savior is Yahshua I will start using it.You say the name does not matter because the Lord knows who you are referring to. If that is the case call him anything you want to, and no matter the name he will know who are speaking of and bless you.
If that is not the case then what name we call him is indeed important. At the very least the right name is important at baptism, since it must be in his name and none other. Can we agree that the Lord's name is important, and that what we call him is important? Or do you still believe what we call him is not important and does not matter?
Dude.... God himself changed the one language of man into the 2000 plus and more then 20,000 associated dialects and NEVER says any where you must not use the name of his only begotten son (note: not the fathers name but the sons) in the perimeters of your own given language.I have shown this several times now brother. Nowhere in scripture do we see the Lord giving us permission to change his name to just a common name held by many other people(even during christ's time)
Here are the verses again brother you may have missed them.
"The true name of Christ is said to be very very very important, the bible does not in any way fail to stress the importance of the Son's name.
Here are some of the passages that state the Importance of this one name given by God for man to be saved.
Acts 4:10-12
Matt 28:18-20
Acts 10:48'
Ephesians 1:21
Acts 2:38
Acts 19:5
John 3:18
Romans 10:13
Acts 2:21
Zech 13:9
Romans 10:9
The name of God is important, more important than getting any other name on earth correct. Why you do not see the importance of getting the one given by God that brings salvation correct I do not understand.
John 5:43"
I ask that you prove from scripture where it says the son's name was not Yah(Yahshua) as the Fathers name is Yah(YHWH).
That is what was written in the encyclopedia
After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands.There is this growing trend of teaching for some years now which has sprung out of the " Hebrew roots" type movment.
The belief that to fully understand scripture you need a deeper understanding of Hebrew language and culture.
Which is really null and void since the New testiment is originally in Greek and true understanding of the word inspired by the Holy Spirit comes by the same Holy Spirit who leads into all Truth.
From that erronious theology of hebrew roots another more insidious doctrine has risen .
it teaches Hebrew language only can be used in reference to God for it to be valid.
Even going as far as to teach ..based upon NO scripture what so ever.. That the name of Jesus has MORE power if you pronounce it correctly in Hebrew .
it also teaches that any other lingual translation is false. And not valid.
( and ,not surprisingly ,it also demands days and festivals of law be observed..)
In short it is just another attack to bar the way to life by confusing the use of the name of JESUS and dragging oeople back under the Law by which they can be condemned.
It is SO FLAWED as a theology yet is gaining vast numbers of followers . you can tell them by thier increasing use of yeshua or yehashua when they are conversing in General with English not hebrew audiences.
I.e if a hebrew speaking israeli is using Yeshua ..that is not a sign they are into or influenced by that false theological movment... That is thier native tongue..
But if an every day middle class Australian (for eg only) who has no isreali heritage starts using the name of Jesus in hebrew form only... Whether they realise it or not they have been influence By this false theology.
Its being used to confuse... Where once people plainly prayed..now they are confused so the sprinkle thier prayer wiyh a few "Yeshuas" in hrbrews along with Jesus in English or jesu in chinese.. Just in case. Displaying the confusion and anxieties the false theology has caused them..
My friends who love the lord JESUS...
Be FREE to use his name within the realms of your own language for it is GOD not man and not the devil who caused the languages to br multiplied on the earth .
They All came from God.
And there is Zero ... ZERO!.. Scripture to base such confusing and false theology and doctrine on.
Everyone who calls on the salvation of God..I have shown this several times now brother. Nowhere in scripture do we see the Lord giving us permission to change his name to just a common name held by many other people(even during christ's time)
Here are the verses again brother you may have missed them.
"The true name of Christ is said to be very very very important, the bible does not in any way fail to stress the importance of the Son's name.
Here are some of the passages that state the Importance of this one name given by God for man to be saved.
Acts 4:10-12
Matt 28:18-20
Acts 10:48'
Ephesians 1:21
Acts 2:38
Acts 19:5
John 3:18
Romans 10:13
Acts 2:21
Zech 13:9
Romans 10:9
The name of God is important, more important than getting any other name on earth correct. Why you do not see the importance of getting the one given by God that brings salvation correct I do not understand.
John 5:43"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?