- Oct 11, 2020
- 4,742
- 1,777
- 39
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
If you are such an expert at debate you should be a little more charitable instead of arguing in bad faith.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So you first say the United States may be more immoral than any other culture in history (based on what -- do you think those immoral behaviors/views you list are not rampant in other Western countries now, or at any other point in history, except perhaps the mass shootings, which we have here because of the ease of access to firearms?), and that the Millennials are to blame for abandoning the faith (do you think the Boomers with their 1960s sexual revolution, Roe vs. Wade, celebration of Hugh Hefner, "don't trust anyone over 30," were much more moral/religious in their youths? Who do you think taught the Millennials? Generational tendencies don't occur in context-independent vacuums).
Yet you then say these same American Millennials need to save the culture, and it needs to be done by God.
This is a non-sequitur.
There are still plenty of people speaking out against secular society, especially here in the United States, which STILL remains the most religious of the countries in the West (that, by the way, brings up the question -- if you think we're the most immoral, then why are the European countries -- which are CONSIDERABLY less religiously affiliated than us -- more "moral"? Why would MORE unChristian countries be MORE moral than a much more Christian one?). Why do you think the political left doesn't even use the word "tolerance" anymore? I've spoken with many atheists, leftists, and agnostics online over the years, and they don't just drop all their world views because Christians "spoke out" to them. Actually, that tends to make their views even MORE entrenched. And it's only gotten worse -- go to Reddit, or any discussion forum even about your favorite sports teams, and try to argue with/speak out against those people about faith/religion. Tell me how it goes.
I believe you have a very naive and faulty understanding of human nature, haven't really debated much with people of differing views, don't have much of an understanding of how people construct their views, and -- like many Christians in the United States -- need to look more at the New Testament and what Jesus, Paul, Peter, and John taught. Jesus said His kingdom is not of this world, Paul taught early Christians to respect governing authorities even though Nero and others were putting Christians to death (a much worse fate than an atheist making fun of us online), and not ONE of them gave any instructions to believers to make a national theocracy.
It's not our job to save/redeem the culture; regardless of the nation we live in, or the time point in history. All we can do is practice our faith, whether or not it's "popular" in our nations and cultures.
All he has done is give a one-liner dismissive response to me thus far. He assumes the worst of our nation in bad faith, gives little analysis to his claims, but somehow expects charity in return.Better ask the OP, he seems to have a firm grip on the reasons civilisations fall.
Was this response in any better faith or more charitable than mine?Oh boy, another "the sky is falling" thread. These are never based on completely bonkers ideas...
First off, when I read things like "Only 6% hold to a Biblical worldview", I immediately get suspicious that whoever is claiming that has in mind only their own very narrow idea of what that means that probably only includes whatever Protestant sect they're a part of, to the exclusion of the vast numbers of other Christians around the Western world who might not be Biblical literalists or believers in Biblical inerrancy, but in all other ways (e.g., adherence to the Nicean Creed, which is this very website's statement of faith) are just as Christian as the 6% who apparently meet the OP's definition of holding a "Biblical worldview".
Secondly, there seems to be a mix-up of sorts going on here as a result of trying too hard to map the conditions of Ancient Rome onto our modern geopolitical world. To say that Rome or Greece or wherever fell due to this or that kind of political decadence and cultural ennui is one thing; to say that this was due to a lack of "national identity" is really anachronistic and weird. As any amount of forethought on this matter would remind a person, the Greco-Roman empire (Rome in the West, Byzantium in the East) was just that: an empire. As such, the formation of distinct national identities was itself more of a sign of the empire's decline than the absence of them ever could be. Again, think about it: The Ottoman Empire ruled over a very large and diverse population, just as the later Russian and British empires would likewise rule. And how did each of these end? With the rise of modern nationalism: the liberation of the Greeks, the Balkans, the Armenians, and so on in the case of the Ottoman Empire; the formation of the Russian republic in the case of the Russian Empire (soon to be transformed into the largest constituent nation of the USSR), and the formation of any number of national entities out of former British colonial possessions in the case of the British Empire (India, Iraq, Sudan, etc.). The modern concept of nationalism or the nation-state is strikingly new. When my own grandfather was born in 1911, there was arguably only one independent state in all of Africa (Ethiopia), the Austro-Hungarian Empire was still a thing, Iceland was still a dependency of Denmark, the USA still ruled the Philippines (as they would until 1946), etc. The world looked pretty different than how it does now, and that was just over a century ago. I would be willing to grant that people still had what we could think of as "national identities" a long time ago, but these were not expressed via a kind of 'supra-tribal' mentality like they would be in a modern country like the USA, where what binds people together is being 'American'. Rather, it seems obvious that the Jews of the past just like the Jews of today knew that they were Jews, as is usually also the case with regard to other groups like Armenians or Assyrians (and here I only write 'usually' because there are perhaps a great number who are Arabized/Turkified/Kurdified, and hence disconnected from their true origins), but lacking as they did during most times a suitably unoccupied homeland to call their own, these were ethnolinguistic and/or ethnoreligious designations, not modern 'nationalisms'. In other words, you were a Jew if you were raised in the religion of Judaism, had some familiarity with a distinctly Jewish language or dialect (e.g., Hebrew, Judaeo-Aramaic, Ladino/Judaeo-Spanish, Judaeo-Persian, etc.), and most importantly, if your mother was a Jew (as that is how Jewish identity is conferred as a matter of law). This is all very different than the modern western conception of "national identity". No one says "sorry, but you only get to be Australian or Polish (or whatever) if you're an English or Polish-speaking Christian".
The argument presented in the OP seems to rest upon very weak grounds. I'm not even going to touch any of the stuff about homosexuality (another strikingly modern idea, depending on how exactly it is understood) or which generation is to blame for whatever (here's a hint, though: mainline Protestant Christianity had stopped being the dominant flavor of Christianity in the USA by the mid-1980s, when even the oldest Millennials like me were still in single digits; now tell me, please: has the state of public acceptance or profession of Christianity in the USA gotten better or worse in the years since then? Hmmm...). That's all ridiculous 'culture war' nonsense that I have absolutely no time for.
Was this charitable and done in good faith?Did the Romans not have gays? Or the Greeks? You learn something every day!
I didn't know that you could adopt homosexuality either. The Romans had absolutely no sense of national identity, ever. Where I was born, just inside the furthest limit of the Roman Empire the forts were garrisoned by Syrian troops for many years and the Ancient Britons south of Hadrian's Wall became Roman citizens. After 25 years of service the Syrian soldiers became Roman too and were allotted pieces of land to farm. They would marry local girls and raise their families in harmony with their neighbours.
It is probably unwise to make assumptions about something you clearly know so little about, Jesse. Maybe your antipathy to ways of life different from your own have led you into these misunderstandings.
Why indeed? In France Religious Education cannot take place in state schools. France is not notably immoral as a result, and a lot more tolerant than many Americans who post on CF.Why would MORE unChristian countries be MORE moral than a much more Christian one?).
I am not sure about 'leftists' dropping the word 'tolerance'. It is certainly not something I have noticed - but then, most leftists I know are in the UK. It is true that the Christian message is not helped by being 'spoken out' to by Christians. At a social function I attended recently a minister took it upon himself to decide we would all be better off if we sang a hymn together. We were a very mixed bunch but there were many observant Christians who were just as reluctant to join is as the atheist half of the company. We, the non-hymn-singers, were wholly tolerant. Nobody countered with a rendition of the Red Flag or the Internationale (though some of knew the words).Why do you think the political left doesn't even use the word "tolerance" anymore? I've spoken with many atheists, leftists, and agnostics online over the years, and they don't just drop all their world views because Christians "spoke out" to them.
It isn't charitable to accuse an entire nation of being the most immoral in history. That's about as uncharitable an accusation as I've seen on these forums.
That does seem to be the case.Maybe he has everyone but you on ignore.
First off, when I read things like "Only 6% hold to a Biblical worldview", I immediately get suspicious that whoever is claiming that has in mind only their own very narrow idea of what that means that probably only includes whatever Protestant sect they're a part of, to the exclusion of the vast numbers of other Christians around the Western world who might not be Biblical literalists or believers in Biblical inerrancy, but in all other ways (e.g., adherence to the Nicean Creed, which is this very website's statement of faith) are just as Christian as the 6% who apparently meet the OP's definition of holding a "Biblical worldview".
I will pray for him and move on.
No offence, but what you have written is not demonstrable. The concept of homosexuality was unknown to the Romans or their successors. Rome was never a nation, so had no national identity. Anybody in the Empire could claim citizenship, but was quite another matter.No offense but you have not demonstrated that you understand what I have written.
It is my understanding that the ideologies that both the Greeks and the Romans adopted led to the demise of these once-global powers from the west.
Things like adopting Homosexuality, a loss of national identity, and generally an attack on family values led to the demise of these once powerful entities.
No offence, but what you have written is not demonstrable. The concept of homosexuality was unknown to the Romans or their successors. Rome was never a nation, so had no national identity. Anybody in the Empire could claim citizenship, but was quite another matter.
The ends of the Greek and Roman empires are the subject of many scholarly studies and are not amenable to a simplistic idea about religion. The post does not even approach any sense of analysis.
It is my understanding that the ideologies that both the Greeks and the Romans adopted led to the demise of these once-global powers from the west.
Things like adopting Homosexuality, a loss of national identity, and generally an attack on family values led to the demise of these once powerful entities.
That is exactly what is happening in the west today. A society cannot continue to function when family values (Read: Judeo-Christian values) are eroded from the culture.
In fact, even though we have a global economy which means it is harder for the west to fall, nonetheless, we may be more immoral in the US than in any other culture in history.
Some occur in other nations, but not nearly as many, nations that have proceeded further down the path you think is the problem. Perhaps the problem has to do with cultural attitudes towards guns and the relative availability of guns.We have mass shootings,
abortion,
Which is "LGBTQ people exist and should be treated fairly and decently."an LGBTQ+ agenda,
It is in decline.a decline of Christianity,
and only about 6% of people in the US hold a Biblical worldview (which drops to 2% for Gen Z). While you could make the case that other nations around the world are more unchristian (Japan, for example, where there are only 1% of Christians in the population including cults and anything even resembling Christianity), I say what I say due to such a rapid drop away from Christianity in the US.
I will admit, we Gen-Xers are not holding up our end of the bargain on deconstruction.It is how fast we are declining that I say this. We are entering a state of spiritual blindness in the US.
I believe most of the fault for this falls on Millennials (of which I am a part). I know people close to me who say, "I am thankful for deconstruction," Etc.
It's time for millennials to make the change we need to make as a society. This can only be done by God. The US is in a very sad state. Liberalism is rampant. Philosophers are knowingly trying to change the definition of words (such as questions of gender).
If you are a Christian, you must speak out against the secular society, get on your knees and pray for revival. God can change this country, but He's the only one who can.
This all sounds like politics, not religion.
It is my understanding that the ideologies that both the Greeks and the Romans adopted led to the demise of these once-global powers from the west.
Things like adopting Homosexuality, a loss of national identity, and generally an attack on family values led to the demise of these once powerful entities.
That is exactly what is happening in the west today. A society cannot continue to function when family values (Read: Judeo-Christian values) are eroded from the culture.
In fact, even though we have a global economy which means it is harder for the west to fall, nonetheless, we may be more immoral in the US than in any other culture in history. We have mass shootings, abortion, an LGBTQ+ agenda, a decline of Christianity, and only about 6% of people in the US hold a Biblical worldview (which drops to 2% for Gen Z). While you could make the case that other nations around the world are more unchristian (Japan, for example, where there are only 1% of Christians in the population including cults and anything even resembling Christianity), I say what I say due to such a rapid drop away from Christianity in the US. It is how fast we are declining that I say this. We are entering a state of spiritual blindness in the US.
I believe most of the fault for this falls on Millennials (of which I am a part). I know people close to me who say, "I am thankful for deconstruction," Etc.
It's time for millennials to make the change we need to make as a society. This can only be done by God. The US is in a very sad state. Liberalism is rampant. Philosophers are knowingly trying to change the definition of words (such as questions of gender). If you are a Christian, you must speak out against the secular society, get on your knees and pray for revival. God can change this country, but He's the only one who can.
We are in the Ethics and Morality sub-forum.
That does seem to be the case.
He continues to go after me with one-liners while refusing to address any of the points made by anyone in this thread, me or otherwise. And he had some very strong critiques from other posters in this thread, some much harsher than mine.
I will pray for him and move on.
Are, there you have your problem. You are not exhibiting the expected groupthink.I expect attitude from Athiest. I don't expect it from other Christians (especially those who I share a political party with).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?