Of course you dont. You only value your own gain, not the gain of the human species as a whole, like any good ape.If I'm her boss, I don't.
I hate it too when doing the right things gets in the way of accumulating wealth.If I'm her boss, I don't. I promote based on merit. And by merit, I mean contributing to my team. And if the men come out on top, I'm not going to "recalibrate" the results, like the female CEO at Yahoo did. And got sued for.
She is worth more because she is contributing to the continuation of the human race.
You know, if you value such a thing.
There are countries where mothers (and fathers!) get paid time off by law after the birth of a child to raise their young children. After that time is up, they ideally can return to their workplace and, after a period of reacclimatisation, continue with their career where they left off.That's absolutely fine and I appreciate that view. The problem is many don't just want to create life they want to create life and carry on working and doing a lousy job at raising the new life because too interested in work. They want government to pass laws to force semi-dedicated mothers back into the workplace and everybody suffers.
Id prefer if the human species died out as quick as possible, so you have my stamp of approval.Sorry you don't approve, but the best people are rated based on their contribution to the company. Some "contribution to the human species" is of no consequence to my business. That is the right thing to do, and that is how it will remain.
Sorry you don't approve, but the best people are rated based on their contribution to the company. Some "contribution to the human species" is of no consequence to my business. That is the right thing to do, and that is how it will remain.
There are countries where mothers (and fathers!) get paid time off by law after the birth of a child to raise their young children. After that time is up, they ideally can return to their workplace and, after a period of reacclimatisation, continue with their career where they left off.
It seems to work out, though.I live in one of those countries.
The employer is forced to hold the position open for the women's return,she gets paid maternity leave and decides when she will leave for the pregnancy.
Surely this isn't how effective business or even family life is supposed to run?
Surely it is.I live in one of those countries.
The employer is forced to hold the position open for the women's return,she gets paid maternity leave and decides when she will leave for the pregnancy.
Surely this isn't how effective business or even family life is supposed to run?
Few mothers can afford not to go back to work. I work for a company that provides flexibility to mothers of infants/young children so they can balance home and work so they are not forced to take a part-time or lower paying job. Incidentally the company is owned by a woman which is probably why there is a policy of understanding the needs of a parenting workforce.That's absolutely fine and I appreciate that view. The problem is many don't just want to create life they want to create life and carry on working and doing a lousy job at raising the new life because too interested in work. They want government to pass laws to force semi-dedicated mothers back into the workplace and everybody suffers.
It seems to work out, though.
What does any of that have to do with paid maternety leave?Yeah, with the all time high divorce rates, and the broken homes and the sexual assault accusations in the work place and the bankrupt western nations.Keep dreamin.
Few mothers can afford not to go back to work. I work for a company that provides flexibility to mothers of infants/young children so they can balance home and work so they are not forced to take a part-time or lower paying job. Incidentally the company is owned by a woman which is probably why there is a policy of understanding the needs of a parenting workforce.
Do you really think the women in the workplace have driven down wages?Women in the workplace has saturated most industries driving down the average household income. An excess of labour decreases wages,a shortage of labour increases wages.
So if we kept the traditional role of men working and women playing supporting roles this wouldn't have happened.
Women who do have children will only be raising them for a portion of their lives. What of the rest? Women also have intelligence and desires beyond the walls of her home or child rearing. Women have just as much to offer outside of the home as men and things are not going back to “the good old days” of women living in a man’s shadow.Women in the workplace has saturated most industries driving down the average household income. An excess of labour decreases wages,a shortage of labour increases wages.
So if we kept the traditional role of men working and women playing supporting roles this wouldn't have happened.
Do you really think the women in the workplace have driven down wages?
Women in the workplace has saturated most industries driving down the average household income. An excess of labour decreases wages,a shortage of labour increases wages.
So if we kept the traditional role of men working and women playing supporting roles this wouldn't have happened.
Before they entered the workplace on mass in the 1960's, yes. People back then could have large family's and only the father needed to work.
This particular section of the forum is not designed to be exclusively 'Christian'. It is designed to discuss ethics and morality in general.---Staff Edit---
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?