Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The Democratic Safe House
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kentonio" data-source="post: 74215760" data-attributes="member: 406284"><p>But that candidate never becomes ‘viable’ in the first place unless people start voting for them. If everyone just voted for their first choice in the primaries, then the winner would be automatically viable. Trying to second guess other people’s votes is nonsensical. </p><p></p><p>I could understand people worrying about electability in the general, but primary viability is just weird.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kentonio, post: 74215760, member: 406284"] But that candidate never becomes ‘viable’ in the first place unless people start voting for them. If everyone just voted for their first choice in the primaries, then the winner would be automatically viable. Trying to second guess other people’s votes is nonsensical. I could understand people worrying about electability in the general, but primary viability is just weird. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The Democratic Safe House
Top
Bottom