http://www.christianforums.com/thre...ution-of-plants.7832911/page-15#post-66056897
You can read from that post on.
I did my very best to remain polite and civil.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Link please?
What's this have to do with my post count?http://www.christianforums.com/thre...ution-of-plants.7832911/page-15#post-66056897
You can read from that post on.
I did my very best to remain polite and civil.
Wrong again, none of the articles that I went to were from a well respected peer reviewed journal. In fact many of them were not from the source sited. They were stand alone articles that were put on the internet by some fan of this kook. And pointing out that a nut is a nut is not a baseless accusation. He has no articles of merit. He cannot find any support of his ideas in the world of science. Instead of running a Gish on me why not link his "best" article. If you Gish I will simply point out that is your sin and leave it at that.
Okay, lets pick one of the references to expose your baseless and childish slandering.
Berthault G., Analysis of Main Principles of Stratigraphy on the Basis of Experimental Data, Litol.Polezn.Iskop.2002, vol 37, no.5,pp 509-515 (Lithology and Mineral resources 2002 (fac-similé) (Engl.Transl.), vol.37, no.5, pp442-446), Journal of the Academy of Sciences of Russia.
The Journal of Lithology and Mineral Resources
Lithology and Mineral Resources (Litologiya i poleznye iskopaemye) reviews a wide range of problems related to the formation of sedimentary rocks and ores. Special attention is devoted to comparison of ancient sedimentary rock and ore formation with present-day processes, as the idea of actualism has always constituted one of the bases of the scientific philosophy of lithologists. A major part of the journal is devoted to comparative analysis of sedimentary processes on continents and in oceans, as well as the genetic aspects of the formation of sedimentary and hydrothermal-sedimentary mineral resources. The journal was founded in 1963 by Academician N. M. Strakhov. It will be of interest to lithologists, petrographers, geochemists, mineralogists, ore geologists and metallogenists, as well as to other geologists, ecologists, researchers of experimental and analytical laboratories, and graduate students.
http://link.springer.com/journal/10987
You are barely worth responding to at this point SZ as you've shown a pattern of dishonesty and childish behavior. Don't expect me to waste my time with more of your nonsense.
I don't quite understand what you are trying to demonstrate with that article. An article published in 2002 showing how Nicolas Stenon's ideas (a naturalist in the 1600's) of superposition were incorrect. Are you suggesting that nothing concerning lithograph, sedimentation, and stratigraphy has been learned since then? Just asking.
What's this have to do with my post count?
Someone with < 1 posts per day telling me to please not derail another post is like someone going into a hospital about every other day and telling the doctors to make sure they follow protocol.SZ's original point was about you lording it over posters with relatively low post counts.
But you are not a doctor so why do you equate yourself with one?Someone with < 1 posts per day telling me to please not derail another post is like someone going into a hospital about every other day and telling the doctors to make sure they follow protocol.
Okay, lets pick one of the references to expose your baseless and childish slandering.
Berthault G., Analysis of Main Principles of Stratigraphy on the Basis of Experimental Data, Litol.Polezn.Iskop.2002, vol 37, no.5,pp 509-515 (Lithology and Mineral resources 2002 (fac-similé) (Engl.Transl.), vol.37, no.5, pp442-446), Journal of the Academy of Sciences of Russia.
The Journal of Lithology and Mineral Resources
Lithology and Mineral Resources (Litologiya i poleznye iskopaemye) reviews a wide range of problems related to the formation of sedimentary rocks and ores. Special attention is devoted to comparison of ancient sedimentary rock and ore formation with present-day processes, as the idea of actualism has always constituted one of the bases of the scientific philosophy of lithologists. A major part of the journal is devoted to comparative analysis of sedimentary processes on continents and in oceans, as well as the genetic aspects of the formation of sedimentary and hydrothermal-sedimentary mineral resources. The journal was founded in 1963 by Academician N. M. Strakhov. It will be of interest to lithologists, petrographers, geochemists, mineralogists, ore geologists and metallogenists, as well as to other geologists, ecologists, researchers of experimental and analytical laboratories, and graduate students.
http://link.springer.com/journal/10987
You are barely worth responding to at this point SZ as you've shown a pattern of dishonesty and childish behavior. Don't expect me to waste my time with more of your nonsense.
Wow -- just wow.A post count of over 3 1/4 million tells everyone here way more than they need to know about you.
Enough said. Now, what scientific information do you have to contribute toward the topic of this thread?Someone with < 1 posts per day telling me to please not derail another post is like someone going into a hospital about every other day and telling the doctors to make sure they follow protocol.
I don't have any fundamental disagreement here. You're assuming some things, but it's nothing I feel the need to argue at this point. I have maintained that ontology or reproductively isolated breeds would be responsible for the greatest level of morphological variation. Plasticity would be a secondary consideration, but still may potentially cause errors in classification.
The "Old-earth" is an over-arching metaphysical model that generally resists potential falsification and is supported by piles of ad-hoc adjustments, much like Evolution in general. 'Conventional geology' has gone through enormous upsets in just the past 50 years, (always repackaged with total confidence in the new model of course). And my inability to refute it does not make it automatically true, nor does it make the hypothesis of rapid deposition of the Hell Creek Formation automatically false. That is a silly dichotomy to propose.
Again, I don't follow your strange picture.
Maybe this will help. Imagine dropping a pile of Triceratops X into the flume, then Y, then Z. This would represent each population's territory gradually being inundated with water. Each group will be transported one after the other and subsequently deposited in a layer of sediment resulting in rapidly form stratified layers.
That the triceratops order seems to show a semblance of a gradual progression would simply be a fortuitous event of how each triceratops breed was deposited. Much of the rock record does not show such seemingly linear progressions.
Faith is the belief in things not seen, but that nonetheless must exist because the preponderance of the evidence leaves no choice. Kinda like faith in dark matter, dark energy, big bangs, redshift and evolution, except none of the evidence actually points to anything they say it does, so they actually have more faith than I.
A creation event that's not a creation event, despite the very math itself declaring the miracle thereof.
I've asked this multiple times. What math?
I've answered this many times. Every math you have that breaks down at the point where the universe starts or life itself starts. Why, do you believe you have math that actually works to explain those times? If so present it.
Of course it was populated, that was what God commanded us to do. However, there is no reason to assume Nod was yet populated.* Cain fears other tribes away from Adam & Eve, because the earth was already populated.
Right, when you live 1000 years, even if you are in another land, you may meet people.* The Lord agrees, puts a mark on Cain lest anyone find him kill him.
Nope. He took his wife I would assume.* Cain went to Nod, finds a wife, has a son named Enoch.
The Family of Cain
16 Then Cain went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod on the east of Eden. 17 And Cain knew his wife, and she conceived
And, of course, Jesus played along with it, didn't He?
Luke 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
Yes, Jesus didn't derive his authority from the scripture.
Wrong, quality always beats quantity. And since a lot of your posts are simply 1! 2! etc. that is an extremely low quality.Someone with < 1 posts per day telling me to please not derail another post is like someone going into a hospital about every other day and telling the doctors to make sure they follow protocol.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?