Eight Foot Manchild
His Supreme Holy Correctfulness
- Sep 9, 2010
- 2,389
- 1,605
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Don't flatter yourself. It takes a lot more than an asinine canard to get on my nerves.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ooh did I hit a nerve...
Hang on, before we get to your (imo pretty wild) conclusion, can we first take a closer look at the method itself?Hello.
I singed up to spread the word of the death of athesim.
Apperently, the frequencies of sound waves look like Hebrew letters. I've recorded a video that presents this scientific discovery, and explains how it kills atheism. This discovery is completely scientific and empirical and I though Christians will be interested.
Hello.
I singed up to spread the word of the death of athesim.
Apperently, the frequencies of sound waves look like Hebrew letters. I've recorded a video that presents this scientific discovery, and explains how it kills atheism. This discovery is completely scientific and empirical and I though Christians will be interested.
Please excuse my English and accent.
Well since atheist generally don't claim that there is no God, just that they don't believe the claims of people who say there is, I don't see how this would be the "death of atheism".
Hang on, before we get to your (imo pretty wild) conclusion, can we first take a closer look at the method itself?
I have two requests:
1. When two different persons say the same word (or even the same person in different ways), the resulting frequency spectrums will surely look different.
I´m sure you did a lot of recordings, and finally picked the best matching ones. Could we see the rest of them, please?
2. In the video you mentioned that you had to tweak the parameters in order to get things right.
Could we please get some examples of the unedited vs. the edited versions?
Thanks in advance.
From the books of the Wizard of Oz:This is pretty much what I thought...why the need for a filter at all? Surely god could've made them look exactly as he wants them to?
It's almost a metaphor for religion itself...
"Hey guys, I got a filter here that makes things look the way you want them to...."
From the books of the Wizard of Oz:
<warning - spoilers!>
For those that have read it, recall how it was a requirement to wear lockable (as in locked-and-needing-a-key-to-remove) glasses that were tinted green, to give the city the appearance of emeralds, while disguising the fact it was simply tinsel, glass, and foil.
"11. The Wonderful City of Oz
Even with eyes protected by the green spectacles, Dorothy and her
friends were at first dazzled by the brilliancy of the wonderful City.
The streets were lined with beautiful houses all built of green marble
and studded everywhere with sparkling emeralds. They walked over a
pavement of the same green marble, and where the blocks were joined
together were rows of emeralds, set closely, and glittering in the
brightness of the sun. The window panes were of green glass; even the
sky above the City had a green tint, and the rays of the sun were green."
The citizens were forbidden to remove them, lest they see that the city was a sham.
http://oz.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Oz_booksThere was a book?!?
It was explained to me by a fellow site member here with a particularly high post count that the mocking and "persecution" that religionists receive, particularly those of the Christian YEC bent, was "prophesied" in the Bible, and is, in his interpretation, a validation of sorts that he/they are on the right path.Others can. Why does one who can't, get so confident that their understanding of the belief is correct?
There was a book?!?
It was explained to me by a fellow site member here with a particularly high post count that the mocking and "persecution" that religionists receive, particularly those of the Christian YEC bent, was "prophesied" in the Bible, and is, in his interpretation, a validation of sorts that he/they are on the right path.
Thus, Bible interpretations trump observations of reality. Or something like that.
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. - Carl Sagan
You wouldn't think so, yet people claim it all the time.hmm, I don't think you can call being mocked on an internet forum persecution.
There's something very special about this phenomenon. It's the language we speak and use in writing.
The difference between phylosophy and physics is that physics asks: "what this is", and phylosophy asks "what can it be".
If it can only be 1 or 2, and it is not 2, than it is one. I don't have to find evidence to 1 when I have evidence that excludes 2. If you truly belive that alians invented the hebrew letters, then you found your refuge, but it is quite a pathetic refuge.
You haven't demonstrated there couldn't possibly be a 3 or 4, or 5, etc yet though.
I looked at it and had my friend Charles run the program. Wow! Strange as it is, you are correct. Well done....there is no rational logical explanation for this phenomenon by purely materialistic means...
The urban dictionary doesn't know this one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?