• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Death and True Resurrection of Jesus.

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
So you saying we should move the Sabbath day on the seventh day of the week from Moses time, to those verses you post by Paul in his time of teaching? Is that what you are saying?
No. In fact, that has been ruled out time after time in the discussions here about this same issue.
 
Upvote 0

Friedrich Rubinstein

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2020
1,386
1,454
Europe
Visit site
✟235,427.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

That's like saying "if you pray on a Tuesday you are not talking to the right God, because Jesus never commanded us to pray on Tuesdays". Ridiculous.

You should get down from your high horse and stop being legalistic. You don't even seem to know the God we are talking about here.
 
Upvote 0

GirdYourLoins

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2016
1,220
930
Brighton, UK
✟137,692.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was taught that in the early days of the church people were becoming believers but were still "celebrating" some of the pagan festivals. In order to break this habit the church leaders introduced the celebrations of Easter and Christmas to allow them to celebrate something in a similar way but with Jesus at the core of it instead of the pagan beliefs. Easter includes some of the elements of the pagan festival such as eggs, chicks and new life, but instead of leading people away from Jesus they were used to lead people to Him.

The whole bunny thing is something that as far as I know was added by Americans much, much later.

So yes the OP is fairly accurate in saying Easter is not biblical but that doesnt mean its pagan, in fact just the opposite, it is so people didnt fall back into pagan practices.
 
Reactions: Albion
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,676
29,282
Pacific Northwest
✟818,429.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

What you share above is something commonly repeated, but is actually not true.

The Christian Feast of Pascha (usually called "Easter" in English) goes about as far back as can be in Christian history. It was universal and ubiquitous among Christians throughout the known world by the mid 2nd century.

When Anicetus was bishop of Rome (157-168 AD) he and Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna met together and discussed many things at length. When they came to the topic of the celebration of Pascha they differed.

In Smyrna and other parts of the Christian East the method to calculate the Feast of Pascha was effectively to simply follow the Jewish calculation of Passover; and so the Christian Paschal Feast occurred on the same day as the Jewish Passover--Nissan 14th. While in Rome, and other parts of the Christian West, as well as in Alexandria the practice was to celebrate the Paschal Feast on the first Sunday after the Jewish Passover.

These two Christian pastors both asserted that the customs of their practice dated back to the Apostles themselves; and they agreed that there was no reason to fight over the matter.

Over time the Quartodeciman tradition (Pascha on Nissan 14th) slowly faded from usage, while other methods of computation, similar to what Rome and Alexandria did, became more common. By the time of the Council of Nicea this method of computation had become nearly universal--with some regional differences. The Council of Nicea, which had gathered chiefly to address the Arian Controversy, also took the time to produce a standardized way to compute the Paschal Feast. They settled on the computation method that was already being used by the Church in Alexandria: The Paschal Feast was to be celebrated on the first Sunday after the Paschal Full Moon (the first full moon after March 21st, the spring equinox in the Northern Hemisphere).

That's why the Paschal Feast this year (2021) is on Sunday, the 4th of April. Because the Paschal Full Moon is March 28th this year. It's a simple way to calculate using things which are ubiquitous in nature--the earth's revolution around the sun and the phases of the moon.

So why is the Paschal Feast--Pascha for short--called "Easter" in English? To that we need to turn to a bit of English and European history.

In the 5th century we get into what historians refer to as the Migration Period, a period of massive migration of Germanic tribes and peoples across Europe. It's the same thing that resulted in the fall of Rome to the Visigoths and Vandals. It's why France is called France and not Gaul. In this period was when the Anglo-Saxon invasions of Britain took place. As Rome pulled out of Britain, the power vaccuum was filled by invading Anglo-Saxons.

After the Anglo-Saxon invasion, they were converted to Christianity by both Irish missionary-monks and missionaries from mainland Europe. A man by the name of Augustine (different Augustine) was sent by the bishop of Rome to establish a diocese in southern Britain--which became the Archdiocese of Canterbury, and to this day the Archbishop of Canterbury is still the spiritual head of the English Church. Under the work of Augustine of Canterbury and the Irish monks the Anglo-Saxons became Christians.

Fast forward several centuries, and we have an Anglo-Saxon monk by the name of Bede writing his possibly most well-known work, On the Reckoning of Time. In a rather brief section in the work he says he felt it was important to discuss how the Anglo-Saxons keep time, and offers the names of the 12 months which the Anglo-Saxons use. He writes that the equivalent Anglo-Saxon month to Roman April was called Eostermonath, which according to Bede gets its name from a goddess named Eostre at one time worshiped by the Anglo-Saxons prior to their conversion to Christianity. But they had long ago abandoned all their pagan practices and now only followed the Christian religion.

And that's it. That's everything Bede has to say about that. And we don't have any other sources. In fact, nobody other than Bede even mentions a goddess named Eostre that was worshipped by the formerly Pagan Anglo-Saxons. Not a single record, no written history, no archeological evidence, nothing. Which has raised the question among many scholars about the possibility that Bede may be wrong--that there was no goddess worshiped by the Anglo-Saxons named Eostre, and so Bede's etymology of Eostermonath was incorrect. It wouldn't be the first time ancient or medieval people were mistaken about the etymology of a word, false etymologies are actually pretty common.

So if Eostre wasn't the name of a goddess, then what could have been the reason for the name Eostermonath? One theory is that it really does just mean something like dawn or dawning month--the month in which the sun has began to rise earlier in the morning each day. By connecting Eostre with old word for "dawn"--like our modern word "east", the direction of the rising sun.

The simple truth of the matter is we don't know, Bede is our only source, and he could be mistaken. But in either case you'll notice that the only thing "pagan" here that could exist is the name "Easter" itself. But worrying about that is like worrying about the fact that the days of the week are named after Roman and Germanic gods (Sun's Day, Moon's Day, Tiw's Day, Woden's Day, Thor's Day, Frigga's Day, Saturn's Day). Or that many of the names of the months are named after Roman gods--January-Janus, May-Maya, June-Juno, etc.

To which we might quote Shakespeare, "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet."

Call it "Easter", or call it by the more ancient and more universal Pascha, it's the same thing--the Feast of our Lord's Glorious Resurrection from the Dead.

The topic of Christmas is a much more complicated subject, but one which I'd be willing to go into discussion about if you'd be interested.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,213
4,674
Eretz
✟380,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private

Completely and utterly INCORRECT!!! The witnesses on the road to Emmaus prove your scenario FALSE!
 
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

spiritfilledjm

Well-known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 15, 2007
1,844
1,642
39
Indianapolis, Indiana
✟270,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'll never understand why people think that we cannot worship God every day at every time for every reason and that we must do it at such and such time on such and such day at such and such hour for such and such reason...that kind of thinking was what put our Savior on the cross to begin with.
 
Reactions: friend of
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You can't quote the text (Matthew 19:16-17) and then say, that one must keep the ten commandments to enter into life. That chapter (Matthew 19) is not saying you must keep the ten commandments to enter life. The text is actually saying something completely different.

1. The rich young man said he kept the ten commandments
2. The rich young man went away grieving; for he was one who owned much property

Here is the proof.

Matthew 19:20-22
The young man said to Him, “All these things I have kept; what am I still lacking?” Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” But when the young man heard this statement, he went away grieving; for he was one who owned much property.

Did you read that?

The rich young man failed to enter life not because he disobeyed the ten commandments. But because the ten commandments do not grant life.

If you keep reading which you probably will not do. You will read that the apostles were astonished that this obedience to the ten commandments did not grant life.

Matthew 19:25-26
When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, “Then who can be saved?” And looking at them Jesus said to them, “With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

See, the ten commandments cannot grant life. It is wrong to say that obedience to the ten commandments grants life.
 
Reactions: ViaCrucis
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,172
Florida
Visit site
✟811,723.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Jesus could not have been crucified on the Passover as the Jews allowed no work during the Passover. The arrest, trial by the chief priests and trial by the Roman praefect Pilate would have violated Jewish law if it was done on the Passover.

In fact the last supper was on the night before the Passover meal as may be seen:

John 13:1 Now before the feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end.
2 And supper being ended, the devil having now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, to betray him;
3 Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God;
4 He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself.
5 After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded.

This was the last supper. Easter is the celebration of resurrection day, the first day of the week after Jesus was crucified. Most Christian churches do not roast lambs for Passover, nor eat unleavened bread for a week.
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Jesus rose on the third day and not after three days and nights. That is a fourth day resurrection your proposing and is heresy.

Matthew 16:21
From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day.

Matthew 17:23
And they will kill Him, and He will be raised on the third day. And they were deeply grieved.

Matthew 20:19
And will hand Him over to the Gentiles to mock and scourge and crucify Him, and on the third day He will be raised up.

Acts 10:40
God raised Him up on the third day and granted that He become visible.

1 Corinthians 15:4
And that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
651
✟140,168.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Do you attend a denomination that teaches this? If so, which one?
 
Upvote 0

Hanging by a Thread

Active Member
Jan 31, 2021
223
102
fulton
✟30,499.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Hi Bro T,
Nice post and I don't doubt that there could be some merit in your position. I often wondered about the fact that Friday to Sunday does not equal three full days.
I really didn't want to but in here, but I gotta throw the flag on this particular post. It's you who is including "Sabbath day on the seventh day of the week (Saturday)", not Jesus. Jesus didn't say anything about the top ten commandments, he just said commandments. And you omitted the part where Jesus was asked specifically which commandments, to which Jesus responded with the commandments you have highlighted in red. If you want add more commandments from Exodus why stop at the top ten? Why not include the other commandments issued such as 17 “Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death", and several others that are considered either obsolete or too outrageous to adhere to. If Jesus wanted to "include" the commandment that makes your point, why didn't he?
Ok, got that off my chest. Nothing personal, you just happened to be in sight. I see this kind of thing on these threads all the time, where someone tries to project what God/Jesus said beyond what he actually said. I just couldn't let it go this time. I aplogize.
Carry on.
 
Upvote 0

Hanging by a Thread

Active Member
Jan 31, 2021
223
102
fulton
✟30,499.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
That's the spirit.
 
Upvote 0

Hanging by a Thread

Active Member
Jan 31, 2021
223
102
fulton
✟30,499.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Hi Klutedavid.
I'm not seeing it your way. I don't see where it says the young man failed to enter life. The young man asked what he he should do to have eternal life. Jesus responded with specific commandments to follow. End of story. Well, that part of the story, anyway. The man said he follows those commandments already, is there anything else I should do. At that point Jesus told him what he needed to do to be perfect in order to get a better seat in heaven. Didn't say anything about the commandments not being enough to be saved. If that was the case, why would he answer the initial question as such? Jesus mentioned to the apostles how difficult it is for the rich to get into heaven. The apostles astonishment didn't have anything to do with the ten commandments (which is actually only six commandments in this case- Jesus didn't mention all ten). It was the "shoving the camel through the eye of a needle comment" that raised the eyebrows. At which point Jesus calmed 'em down by telling them God can do anything, including camels through needles, so don't you worry about that. That's my take, anyway.
 
Reactions: friend of
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In the NT and today the Greek word for the day of the week we call Friday is parasceue, which means "preparation."
All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on parasceue/Friday.

Mar 15:42 And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, [παρασκευή/Parasceue] that is, the day before the sabbath, [προσάββατον/prosabbaton]
Luk 23:54 And that day was the preparation, [παρασκευή/Parasceue] and the sabbath drew on.
Joh 19:14 And it was the preparation [παρασκευή/Parasceue] of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King!
Joh 19:31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, [παρασκευή/Parasceue] that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.
Mat 27:62 Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, [παρασκευή/Parasceue] the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,



 
Reactions: Pavel Mosko
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Your thinking that the rich young man was saved and just lost some reward upstairs.

I think, the rich young man could not follow Jesus, because he loved his wealth too much. How do I know this?

Because the apostles said so.

Matthew 19:25
When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, “Then who can be saved?”

The apostles saw the young man grieving and leaving the area, unable to follow Jesus.

It was clear that the young man knew he could not follow Jesus, which explained his reaction.
 
Upvote 0

Sheila Davis

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2020
838
292
Houston
✟73,338.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Divorced
There are many Christian organizations and some Christian institutions
I agree ...... Many Christian organizations / institutions have come to the conclusion, after doing their research of scripture and the ways of the ancient Hebrews, Jesus rose on the 7th Day the Sabbath.

It seems the Hebrew days began at 6 p.m. and ended 24 hours later at 6 p.m. unlike the now used Roman's - which begins at 12 a.m.

The Hebrews had several different sabbath celebrations, besides the 7th Day Sabbath. One must know which Sabbath was being referred to when the word Sabbath is used.

Organization such as The Trumpet _ Beyond Today _ Tomorrow's World _Church of The Great God _ The Israel of God _ Biblical Archaeology are some that gives their reasonings in their articles.

It is theorized and you have stated in your comments about Easter - when Constantine became a Christian he and the early Roman church leaders changed the old Roman pagan gods celebration did on the first day, to a Christian celebration of the Resurrection.

Whatever happened, from Friday night on the Roman Calendar to before day Sunday morning is not three days and three nights. Plus if Christ rose on the 7th Day Sabbath -that goes back to Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy. And I have to add in The Lost Gospel According to Peter / The Last Gospel of Peter - which is only one incomplete chapter verse 12 says "and at dawn upon the Lord's Day Mary Magdalene, a disciple of the Lord, fearing because of the Jews, since they were burning with wrath, had not done at the Lord's sepulchre the things which women are wont to do for those that die and for those that are beloved by them - she took her friends with her and came to the sepulchre where he was laid. I asked the question what and when is the Lord Day? This gospel was supposedly discovered it 1886, in the Valley of the upper Nile called Akhmim, in a monk's grave. I wonder where is it now?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,177
3,444
✟1,004,647.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sabbath is the sabbath, Sunday is a different day. what's your point? the early biblical church valued worship on Sunday without dispute but this in no way attacks the Sabbath. The bible has never mandated worship to be only held on one day of the week regardless of which day you think that is.
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,213
4,674
Eretz
✟380,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private

No He did not. He rose on the 1st day of the week, after sunset, not on Shabbat. If it was found in a Monk's grave then he understood the Lord's day as being that 1st day of the week.
 
Upvote 0
Dec 16, 2011
5,214
2,557
59
Home
Visit site
✟251,766.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
You're counting nights and days in accordance with contemporary reasoning and not with knowledge of how nights and days are counted in the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Eloy Craft

Myth only points, Truth happened!
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2018
3,132
871
Chandler
✟431,808.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This pattern of numbers captures the heart beat of creation

5 have passed one is now one is yet to come when he does he will stay a short time for he is also the eighth and of the seven and he goes to his destruction. Convert that to days and the 7th day is also the eighth which is the first day of the week. The eighth is one of the 7. The eighth day is the eternal day and one of the 7. Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath so it conforms to His life. Just as we know this creation goes to its destruction to become the New Heaven and New Earth, so it is with the 7th day rest. Jesus was at rest in the tomb on the seventh day and rose on the 1st day of the week. The eighth day the eternal day one of the seven.
 
Upvote 0