Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You don't know all my "logic," do you?
Do you know what diabolical mimicry is?
Hint: It's the "logic" that allows me to be a monotheist, despite all the lines of cause-and-effect evidence I just gave.
Sounds like special pleading.
pitabread said:This suggests you're not good at following the consequence of your own argument.
Keep them QEDs a-commin'!Pretzel logic?
Ahh the old incomplete fossil record argument.By "biological record" I assume you mean "fossil record"?
If so, you seem to have drawn a conclusion premised on at least these two assumptions:
1. Everything that ever lived becomes fossilized
2. We have discovered every fossil
The complete absence of evidence caanot be shown as such because the set belonging to examples of antecedant to the feather, the pentadactyl limb, flowers, the enucleate blood cell etc etc is empty. All I can show you is an empty set which by the reckoning of Evolutionists should be easilly filled.Please provide evidence for these assumptions or stop making such silly claims about 'appearing abruptly' with no 'antecedent' ....
Nonsense.Ahh the old incomplete fossil record argument.
The thing is, that by invoking this argument you admit that what is being presented as scientific fact is in fact devoid of supporting evidence.
According to many Scientists theories that are not testable are simply not science.
The test for the theory of common descent on the fossil record would be adequate fossil evidence to demonstrate the lineage.
After 160 years of banging on at the same theory such evidence is not available, by your own admission.
The validity of the theory as Science must therefore be brought into question.
The complete absence of evidence caanot be shown as such because the set belonging to examples of antecedant to the feather, the pentadactyl limb, flowers, the enucleate blood cell etc etc is empty. All I can show you is an empty set which by the reckoning of Evolutionists should be easilly filled.
Because they were designed different.My almost 7 year old asked a question the other day and after explaining the answer to him I wondered how creationists would answer the question:
"Why do dolphin tails go side to side and shark tails go up and down?
Why do humans have two hands and two feet, and chimpanzees have four hands?Why are they different?"
If evolution isn't about finding the perfect existence, then it's rather hard to believe in evolution, isn't it?
Only the fittest need apply ... right?Evolution isn't looking for the perfect existence. Evolution isn't looking for anything.
Only the fittest need apply ... right?
As in: survival of the fittest?
The rest ... if they don't like it ... can fight or flight?
Actually I honed and tweaked a couple of my beliefs.... I... I really don't what to say in response to this. You obviously didn't spend your time aware learning anything, did you?
Actually I honed and tweaked a couple of my beliefs.
Proverbs 27:17a Iron sharpeneth iron;
You're welcome to read all my posts at the other site if you want.Yeah, I don't think you did.
You're welcome to read all my posts at the other site if you want.
It would be the scientific thing to do
Of course, if "investigate before you communicate" doesn't appeal to you ... well ... don't mistake me for being interested in your science either.
My Hubble ChallengeAnd which other site would that be?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?