Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. Actually, it doesn't.Pretty sure it does mean more. .
No. Actually, it doesn't.
But you've had more than a few chances now to add something to the discussion and have chosen just to keep repeating the same comment, so it's bye-bye time.
The testimony of two or three are needed to validate a truth.
You don't believe human testimony. But there is another who will testify
No. Actually, it doesn't.
But you've had more than a few chances now to add something to the discussion and have chosen just to keep repeating the same comment, so it's bye-bye time.
There arent dieities sir!You need evidence that is independent of a person. Last I checked, two or three people can still invent stories.
You don't believe human testimony, either. Look at all the deities that also have human testimony to back them, yet you don't believe in those deities.
No just be a Berean and read the Word of God yourselfIs there a Christianese <-> English translator somewhere on the internet?
Really? I suppose that's what an education in engineering rather than in the liberal arts will do to you.When the comment doesn't sink in, one can only repeat it.
Say it a thousand more times if that's all you have, but we all know that humans penned the scriptures. That's not the issue--and you know as well as I do that it's not.Humans wrote the bible
Really? I suppose that's what an education in engineering rather than in the liberal arts will do to you.
Say it a thousand more times if that's all you have, but we all know that humans penned the scriptures. That's not the issue--and you know as well as I do that it's not.
Whether what was written down (by humans) was/is their own thinking or, to the contrary, was inspired by God and therefore is revelation.
To use an analogy, very few people would summarily dismiss the transcript of the court's proceedings as recorded by the court stenographer by saying it's nothing but her opinion, but that approach is the whole of your argument against the Bible.
That would be your "take" on the matter, and some of us feel that there's enough evidence for us to conclude that it's revelation. There is no way to resolve the issue to everyone's satisfaction.It seems to me that the default position on that, is that it comes from the minds of humans - just like every other story told/written by humans.
And the courthouse may not have been built to code. And the judge might have been getting over the flu.That's an extremely invalid analogy. Judges demonstrably exist and court proceedings are common verifiable knowledge.
There arent dieities sir!
That's the problem already:
Many profess to have god(s) but deny The Son. He who denies The Son denies The Father who sent Him
And that man in a sense calls God a liar. He does not believe Gods testimony which He has given of His Son
The man who receives Gods testimony which He has given if His Son sets to his own (spirit) seal that Gods Word is true.
Because that man has That Witness in him who testifies with his spirit to the Truth of the Word of God
(Reference 1John5)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?