Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No doubt the author will take some guff for it.Defens0rFidei said:That was brave for a non-Catholic to write. Kudos.
MichelleEvangelicals can and should join with other Christians in celebrating the virgin Mary as theotokos: or as historian Jaroslav Pelikan translated the classic theological word, as "the one who gave birth to the one who is God." This title takes us back to the debates about Christology in the fifth century.
The teacher Nestorius did not like to give Mary the title theotokos. He preferred to call her christotokos, "the bearer of Christ." This is because he understood the divinity and humanity of Christ to function as two separate compartments not intrinsically related to one another. Believing that this portrayed a schizophrenic kind of Christ who could hardly be understood as one undivided person, the Council of Ephesus (431) declared Nestorius's teaching heretical and recognized the title theotokos, God-bearer, as an orthodox way to describe Mary.
Defens0rFidei said:That was brave for a non-Catholic to write. Kudos.
Right. I'm saving this article for the next time that I am told that Mary is a vessel who played not particularly large part in salvation history.Shelb5 said:This is true orthodox Protestantism.
Miss Shelby said:Right. I'm saving this article for the next time that I am told that Mary is a vessel who played not particularly large part in salvation history.
That's why I thought the article was so good.
Michelle
Agreed. And I don't mean to misrepresent orthodox Protestantism, I'd just like to be able to point it out to those Protestants who malign the Mother of God that that isn't orthodox Protestantism.Shelb5 said:In all honesty it isnt fair to compare all Protestants with one another. From what I read, many, not all but many of the Protestants on this board do not represent true orthodox Protestantism.
Miss Shelby said:Agreed. And I don't mean to misrepresent orthodox Protestantism, I'd just like to be able to point it out to those Protestants who malign the Mother of God that that isn't orthodox Protestantism.
If that makes any sense. Not sure if it does.
Michelle
First, we find no biblical warrant for the kind of devotion to Mary that flourishes among many of the Catholic faithful. Mary's perpetual virginity (the belief that she had no children after Jesus and remained a virgin throughout her life), immaculate conception (that she was born without the stain of original sin), and bodily assumption (that she was taken body and soul into heaven after she died without seeing corruption) are extrabiblical beliefs that cannot be traced to the earliest historical memory of the church.
To be sure, if God had wanted to raise Mary and take her directly to heaven without her waiting for the general resurrection, he certainly could have done so. We know that God took Elijah into heaven without death. But to declare this teaching an infallible dogma, as Pope Pius XII did in 1950, creates an even deeper divide between Catholics and other Christians. This is why Brother Roger Shutz, the Swiss Protestant founder of the Taizé community, felt it necessary to travel to Rome to urge the pope not to take this step. Brother Roger rightly saw that this act would drive Christians further away from one another.
Protestants believe that an undue extolling of Mary obscures, if it does not contradict, the sole sufficiency of Jesus Christ as the unique Savior and only mediator between God and human beings. Recent efforts to have Mary officially recognized as mediatrix of all graces, or as co-redemptrix with Christ himselfthough unsuccessful thus farhave only added to the fear that lifting up Mary can only result in bringing down Jesus.
Agreed. There are some things that I am not in agreement with obviously, but it's as about as orthodox as you can get for Protestantism. And it's refreshing to see.Bastoune said:Not quite accurate on the doctrines we Catholic and Orthodox hold regarding Mary, as evidenced by this quote, but overall, for a Protestant article, not bad!