• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The Blessed Evangelical Mary

Status
Not open for further replies.

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Defens0rFidei said:
That was brave for a non-Catholic to write. Kudos.
No doubt the author will take some guff for it.

I especially respect this part:
Evangelicals can and should join with other Christians in celebrating the virgin Mary as theotokos: or as historian Jaroslav Pelikan translated the classic theological word, as "the one who gave birth to the one who is God." This title takes us back to the debates about Christology in the fifth century.
The teacher Nestorius did not like to give Mary the title theotokos. He preferred to call her christotokos, "the bearer of Christ." This is because he understood the divinity and humanity of Christ to function as two separate compartments not intrinsically related to one another. Believing that this portrayed a schizophrenic kind of Christ who could hardly be understood as one undivided person, the Council of Ephesus (431) declared Nestorius's teaching heretical and recognized the title theotokos, God-bearer, as an orthodox way to describe Mary.
Michelle
 
Upvote 0

MariaRegina

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2003
53,283
14,159
Visit site
✟115,460.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Defens0rFidei said:
That was brave for a non-Catholic to write. Kudos.

Speaking of the last name George ....

Since I am studying linguistics, I am also interested in the origin of last names. Many people who have the last name "George" tell me that when their parents, grandparents or ancestors came to America, only the wife spoke English. So the immigration officer would ask,

"What's your husband's name."

The wife would respond, "George, his name is George."

Immigration officer: What's his first name?

Wife: George.

Immigration officer: Okay, Mrs. George. And what is your name?

Wife: Maria

Immigration officer: Maria George, welcome to the United States of America!

Since the wife had heard that her name would most likely be changed, she usually didn't challenge this.

Therefore, some Italians, Greeks, and Lebanese bear the name "George", which is a very common Christian name in those countries. In the same way, "Thomas" and "Victor" became a last name.

So perhaps, just perhaps, the author, Timothy George, will come full circle and embrace once again the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Faith which his ancestors originally embraced.

Let us pray...
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Miss Shelby said:
Right. I'm saving this article for the next time that I am told that Mary is a vessel who played not particularly large part in salvation history.

That's why I thought the article was so good.

Michelle

In all honesty it isn’t fair to compare all Protestants with one another. From what I read, many, not all but many of the Protestants on this board do not represent true orthodox Protestantism.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Shelb5 said:
In all honesty it isn’t fair to compare all Protestants with one another. From what I read, many, not all but many of the Protestants on this board do not represent true orthodox Protestantism.
Agreed. And I don't mean to misrepresent orthodox Protestantism, I'd just like to be able to point it out to those Protestants who malign the Mother of God that that isn't orthodox Protestantism.

If that makes any sense. Not sure if it does.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Miss Shelby said:
Agreed. And I don't mean to misrepresent orthodox Protestantism, I'd just like to be able to point it out to those Protestants who malign the Mother of God that that isn't orthodox Protestantism.

If that makes any sense. Not sure if it does.

Michelle

It makes perfect sense.
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
52
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
Not quite accurate on the doctrines we Catholic and Orthodox hold regarding Mary, as evidenced by this quote, but overall, for a Protestant article, not bad!



First, we find no biblical warrant for the kind of devotion to Mary that flourishes among many of the Catholic faithful. Mary's perpetual virginity (the belief that she had no children after Jesus and remained a virgin throughout her life), immaculate conception (that she was born without the stain of original sin), and bodily assumption (that she was taken body and soul into heaven after she died without seeing corruption) are extrabiblical beliefs that cannot be traced to the earliest historical memory of the church.

To be sure, if God had wanted to raise Mary and take her directly to heaven without her waiting for the general resurrection, he certainly could have done so. We know that God took Elijah into heaven without death. But to declare this teaching an infallible dogma, as Pope Pius XII did in 1950, creates an even deeper divide between Catholics and other Christians. This is why Brother Roger Shutz, the Swiss Protestant founder of the Taizé community, felt it necessary to travel to Rome to urge the pope not to take this step. Brother Roger rightly saw that this act would drive Christians further away from one another.

Protestants believe that an undue extolling of Mary obscures, if it does not contradict, the sole sufficiency of Jesus Christ as the unique Savior and only mediator between God and human beings. Recent efforts to have Mary officially recognized as mediatrix of all graces, or as co-redemptrix with Christ himself—though unsuccessful thus far—have only added to the fear that lifting up Mary can only result in bringing down Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Polycarp1

Born-again Liberal Episcopalian
Sep 4, 2003
9,588
1,669
USA
✟40,875.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Brilliant and beautiful article!

I was convicted by the Holy Spirit of "Mariophobia" some years ago. I don't hold it an article of faith that she was in fact conceived without original sin, or taken bodily into Heaven -- but I figure that is between her and God, not my business or need to make a judgment about one way or the other.

The role I've always seen our Lady in is the one who points to Christ, who follows Him and serves as our example of how to live a life committed to Him. For every Christian, be he the most fundamental evangelical or the most Blue Army-ite Catholic, her words at Cana are (I believe) the heart and soul of the Christian message: "Do what He tells you!"

BA (and congratulations on your "coming home"! :)) -- I don't misread that part you highlighted as pejorative at all -- from a sola Scriptura standpoint, the evidence for the perpetual virginity, immaculate conception, and assumption is not in Scripture, and it is only later, with Justin Martyr and others of his time, that we find any early writings strongly supportive of those doctrines. (I'm not arguing for sola Scriptura in OBOB! by any means, but simply saying that from a Protestant perspective, the statements are accurate -- without the Magisterium, a Protestant depends on Scripture to guide him into truth.)

Our Eucharistic Prayers end with a doxology calling the Communion of Saints into witness and praise along with us for God's work of redemption. Of late, our (woman) priest has made it a point to begin the list of those invoked with Mary and Mark (our parish patron saint). This is as it should be.

There is one other point I'd raise, very tentatively -- our Lady is worthy of our respect and love, to be sure -- but is it possible, in witnessing to God's grace at work in and through her, to draw attention to the fact (which I believe is solid Catholic doctrine) that her life bears witness that even the holiest among us is saved through the redeeming Atonement of Christ, and not through our own virtues? She, who devoted her whole life to Him, bears witness to that most fully of all saints.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Bastoune said:
Not quite accurate on the doctrines we Catholic and Orthodox hold regarding Mary, as evidenced by this quote, but overall, for a Protestant article, not bad!
Agreed. There are some things that I am not in agreement with obviously, but it's as about as orthodox as you can get for Protestantism. And it's refreshing to see. :)

Michelle
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.