Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
NOT DISTRACTING ENOUGHThe House GOP wants to get in on the act.
Maybe not - Trump rambled on the press conference in England today that the reason Epstein was a disgrace was because he hired away "the help" from Mar-a-Lago.By beating him out for a mansion in PB?
If you actually think Donald didn't know Epstein's "true colors" before that, I've got a bridge I'd love to sell you. Great location, easy payments, act now!And why don’t you post a year that Donald Trump went to a party with Epstein? Probably because it happened before Donald Trump unfriended Epstein when he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. We already know that Trump was once a friend of Epstein’s, that is until Epstein revealed his true colors.
We should be careful to distinguish possible reasons, from implausible ones. I don't believe the "help" claim at all. (He's previously claimed it was a member's daughter that triggered the disconnection.) More plausible reasons seem to be competition for a PB mansion both wanted to purchase, including a version that has Epstein "realizing" that *Trump* was "a crook." Frankly, I wouldn't put too much weight in any of them, but whatever Trump is selling now probably isn't true.Maybe not - Trump rambled on the press conference in England today that the reason Epstein was a disgrace was because he hired away "the help" from Mar-a-Lago.
WATCH: Trump says he ended friendship with Epstein because he 'stole people that worked for me'
The Republican president said Monday that he had warned Epstein about hiring Trump staff and that when Epstein did it again, “I threw him out of the place.”www.pbs.org
You don't know what people do and don't knowYour claim is utterly baseless and you know it. So does everyone else.
And the left seems to believe that their leaders do no wrong while all the evidence points to the contrary.If you actually think Donald didn't know Epstein's "true colors" before that, I've got a bridge I'd love to sell you. Great location, easy payments, act now!
-- A2SG, you could even name it after Donald, if you like....
Accusation in a mirror.And the left seems to believe that their leaders do no wrong while all the evidence points to the contrary.
As a businessman? They were best buds and partied together for 15 years!But sometimes, as a businessman, you have to deal with other people, even unsavory people, in order to do business. Maybe he knew Epstein’s true colors, but until they impacted him or his business/home (since Mar-a-Lago is his home), he was free to not have to address it before then.
On the contrary, it is well founded whether you admit it or not.Your claim is utterly baseless and you know it.
Another emotional rant! You may attempt to use logic to justify your emotional reaction, but your conclusion is very obviously based on your emotions.So does everyone else. Over and over again your posts have shown to little more than an emotional rants rather than based upon logical conclusions surrounded by facts because of your dislike or Trump. Which is an emotion. Pointing out the fact rhat my conclusion was logical based on your posts was the proper thing to do. How on earth you deemed that as emotional is quite a head scratcher.
There's an incomplete thought!Lol. I guess you are entitled to believe what you
And under Trump's, Patel's and Bongino's control for the last six months. They may have been disappeared by now.Hmm... which was under control of the Democrats for rhe last four years. STILL no photographs though.
Lols. “And it was Trump – with girls of uncertain age."Of course it didn't because thats what Wolff said. And you know what he didnt say in that article? That the photos were of under 18 year old topless girls with Trump.
You know good well what the article said. You posted it. I hope you read it. Even your second article doesn't say they were under 18 year old topless girls on his lap.
And guess what. Still no pictures. Your claim and Wolffs claim have no evidence. In fact according to that article Wolff doesn't even claim what you do.
You're going to have to take that up with whoever said such an odd thing.And the left seems to believe that their leaders do no wrong while all the evidence points to the contrary.
Or he simply became a political liability, and Trump threw him aside, just as he does with everyone else who is no longer a benefit to him.But sometimes, as a businessman, you have to deal with other people, even unsavory people, in order to do business. Maybe he knew Epstein’s true colors, but until they impacted him or his business/home (since Mar-a-Lago is his home), he was free to not have to address it before then.
In the Palm Beach real estate deal dispute theory of their falling out, it was Epstein who cut off Trump because Trump screwed Epstein on the deal. Supposedly, Epstein asked Trump to come along to the auction for advice, but Trump went behind Epstein's back and secretly outbid him.Or he simply became a political liability, and Trump threw him aside, just as he does with everyone else who is no longer a benefit to him.
You're going to have to take that up with whoever said such an odd thing.
Frankly, it sounds more like MAGA to me.
I guess you can see it that way when you refuse to see the good that he does because “orange man bad”.Or he simply became a political liability, and Trump threw him aside, just as he does with everyone else who is no longer a benefit to him.
-- A2SG, could go either way, I guess....
Sure I do. If its its baseless they dont know. Cause if they did know they could prove it.You don't know what people do and don't know
No its not. It's utterly a questionable journalists statement. He provides NO evidence whatsoever. There is no foundation of proof or evidence. Unfounded. Your emotions toward Trump have caused you to believe it without evidence.On the contrary, it is well founded whether you admit it or not.
Lol, what an emotional rant. See I was right.Another emotional rant! You may attempt to use logic to justify your emotional reaction, but your conclusion is very obviously based on your emotions.
Its an incomplete sentence. Which happens time to time when one doesn't finish a post and has to come back to it later to finish it.There's an incomplete thought!
More unfounded accusations. Thats all that you've been able to produce.And under Trump's, Patel's and Bongino's control for the last six months. They may have been disappeared by now.
You know what's missing from that sentence? "Topless girls under 18 years of age". And guess what? Still no actual pictures. Just a statement from a questionable source.Lols. “And it was Trump – with girls of uncertain age."
What you seem to fail to understand in your accusations is that most sensible/informed people left/right/center/whatever knew there wasn't much that could be done with "the Epstein files". The data in question is investigative materials including from searches for crimes committed by someone who is dead. If he had accomplices (or "clients") then testimony by actual victims would be needed, and it may be that they didn't want to testify. From public information we know Epstein was involved in the sleazy world of teen modeling and pageants and who some of his associates were in that world.But, as it’s been mentioned numerous times, it’s humorous to see people who didn’t care one iota about Epstein and his perverse activities for YEARS suddenly care because Trump hasn’t done something about it in his first couple months. It reminds me of fake outrage.
Yes, it is.No its not.
Wolff had unusual access to Trump with thousands of interview hours on tape as well as interviews with Epstein. His word is not proof, but it is evidence no matter how desperately you may deny it.It's utterly a questionable journalists statement. He provides NO evidence whatsoever. There is no foundation of proof or evidence. Unfounded. Your emotions toward Trump have caused you to believe it without evidence.
Silly taunting: I know you are but what am I.Lol, what an emotional rant. See I was right.
As expressed, it is also an incomplete thought, soIts an incomplete sentence. Which happens time to time when one doesn't finish a post and has to come back to it later to finish it.
That was not even an accusation but speculation; well, the second half is speculation. Even you, surely, aren't disputing the first half?More unfounded accusations. Thats all that you've been able to produce.
Unless the exact phrase is found the meaning isn't there? No paraphrasing allowed! Your emotions may not allow you to accept Michael Wolff as a source, but beyond "Nu-uh!" you've shown nothing to discredit him as a source.You know what's missing from that sentence? "Topless girls under 18 years of age". And guess what? Still no actual pictures. Just a statement from a questionable source.
To be fair, Epstein did 'hire' Virginia Giuffre who worked at Mar-a-Lago. (starting page 24)Maybe not - Trump rambled on the press conference in England today that the reason Epstein was a disgrace was because he hired away "the help" from Mar-a-Lago.
Epstein had been convicted and dead for several years before Biden came into office. His co-conspirator was in prison. What was the urgency?But, as it’s been mentioned numerous times, it’s humorous to see people who didn’t care one iota about Epstein and his perverse activities for YEARS suddenly care because Trump hasn’t done something about it in his first couple months. It reminds me of fake outrage.
That’s exactly what I think. That Biden’s DoJ combed through the files looking for something incriminating to pin on Trump, and found nothing.On the purely cynical and political side, do you not think that if the Democratic party apparatus thought they could go after Trump and destroy parts of his support base with Epstein, they would not have done so one year ago? Of course they would, but I suspect it wouldn't have worked. Part of the reason that Trump is losing contact with part of his "base" over this is because he put people who pushed conspiracies about Epstein into position of power where they would get to know things and once they did they all come out with "nothing to see here". The same people going after Trump/Bondi/Patel/Bongino would have just gone after the Dem/DeepState as their Pizzagate/QAnon/et seq. conspiracies about "prominent Dems as sex abuse of minors" had been pushing for 8 years and it would not have worked. Trump has been literally stirring this pot for years and then asked the flame stokers to join him in the pot while they relit the fire.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?