Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He's under the assumption that the word "assume" is a position of weakness.
All I can say is that when I choose to not assume, but rather ask questions first and actually seek truth, the truths I find make a whole lot of sense. If you're saying I'm wrong for doing this, then all I can do is respectfully disagree.
Nope. Your entire belief system is predicated on what you want to believe, not on reasons for why you should believe.
I've repeatedly pointed out how your syllogism is fallacious, and you continue to ignore this fact.
In a nutshell, your argument boils down to: This is what I believe, because I want to believe it.
All we ask is that you present the objective and verifiable evidence that convinced you.
And all I'm asking of you is to really think about that request. Can you present the objective and verifiable evidence that convinced you that you are actually a conscious being?
And all I'm asking of you is to really think about that request. Can you present the objective and verifiable evidence that convinced you that you are actually a conscious being?
DNA is twisted.
That's why this world is in the twisted shape it's in today.
They have a spectograph. Every element burns it's own individual color. So they know all the different elements that make up each star.it is an assumption that all stars radiate the same spectrum and not unique spectrums.
I do not accept the mutation theory and I will argue against it. Yet some of the 101 evolution theory like founder effect and bottleneck are well established. To be sure man mixes truth and error. That is all a part of science. Our life depends on science. For example eating right is essential. So we all have to sift through for the truth and weed out the error. Those who fail to do so increase their risk factor. A popular theory right now is we can reduce our risk factor enough through healthy eating, exercise and stress control so that we will not need surgery or medicine.Evolution is impossible, both Biblically & Scientifically.
1. Number of known (including extinct) species, over the rate of mutation, over the age of the Earth. You would need Trillions upon Trillions upon Trillions of Eons and according to "Science" global extinction level events happen far more often than that. Factor in everything and Evolution is impossible.
2. Information cannot generate randomly.
3. The Information reading, correcting, replicating & executing system, cannot generate randomly.
4. No Beneficial Mutations from an increase in information, ever recorded.
5. Even in the theory, if a beneficial mutation occurs in a deer, once ever 1,000 years, the mutation would have to survive 200 generations of breeding with non-mutant specimens, before another specimen receives the same mutation, to reinforce the mutant gene within the gene pool.
The odds are astronomically stacked against species to species evolution.
ps. The "scientists" lie.
Humans & Chimps are closer to 70% similar, not 98%.
When that study was done, it cost $1 BILLION to sequence the Human genome and no one managed to raise the money to sequence the full chimpanzee genome. So they sequenced 1 arm of 1 chromosome and the fudged the results.
Just like everything else in the History of Evolutionary Science. Look into the authenticity of the evidence of evolution. You will find them all to be hoaxes, except the newest evidences; because it takes time to figure out their lies.
I hope this helps
I sure can. The measurements and findings that I make have been verified by others in an objective manner.
Now it's your turn. Where is the objective and verifiable evidence for the existence of God?
Yep. You're wrong for doing this, because you're picking the answer, then seeking the evidence, which is bassackwards. If it works for you, good on ya'.All I can say is that when I choose to not assume, but rather ask questions first and actually seek truth, the truths I find make a whole lot of sense. If you're saying I'm wrong for doing this, then all I can do is respectfully disagree.
Yep. You're wrong for doing this, because you're picking the answer, then seeking the evidence, which is bassackwards. If it works for you, good on ya'.
Or, he sought an answer that explained the observational evidence. But, if you think burning straw-men make your electrical universe ideas more credible, you get back to it.I hate to break it to you, but Guth did the very same thing with "inflation".
What?! When did this happen??
No.Does not your bible state that the Earth is immovable?
Or, he sought an answer that explained the observational evidence.
But, if you think burning straw-men make your electrical universe ideas more credible, you get back to it.
Or, he sought an answer that explained the observational evidence. But, if you think burning straw-men make your electrical universe ideas more credible, you get back to it.
It certainly is not dependant on your opinion of mainstream science. But when will you realize that?FYI, the "credibility" of EU/PC theory isn't the least bit dependent upon the lack of credibility of Lambda-CDM.
http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/science-universe-not-expanding-01940.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?