Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Abiogenesis/Atheism Fallacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HAPMinistries" data-source="post: 57091590" data-attributes="member: 272496"><p>Absolutely not.</p><p>The point is, if you were in perfect time, and I was in perfect time, even though our timing would differ, there would be a perfectly consistent difference. That is what i kept comparing to the Leap Year. You have one every four years, period. You do not have one after 3 years, then after 5 years, then 3 years in a row... no, like clockwork, one every four years.</p><p></p><p>It it was just a timing difference, it would be perfectly predictable.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That there is only 1 variable, and I have asked you for any other, and none of our references point to any other variable that would cause time to waiver in an inconsistent pattern. That would be the earth's rotation slowing down.</p><p></p><p><em>Through the 8 year span of 1972-1979, 9 seconds were gained, but from 1999-today, only 2 seconds have gained.</em></p><p></p><p>That is terribly inconsistent. There is a 9 second gain in 8 years, then a 2 second gain over 12, going into 13 years. </p><p>Using your example, If you counted to 10, .1 seconds faster than me, after counting 10 times, you would perfectly be 1 second faster. </p><p>After counting 20 times, you would be 2 seconds faster.</p><p>After counting 30 times, you would be 3 seconds faster.</p><p>After counting 40 times, you would be 4 seconds faster.</p><p>After counting 50 times, you would be 5 seconds faster.</p><p></p><p><strong>BUT</strong></p><p></p><p>If after counting 10 times, you would be 2 seconds faster, then something would be wrong. Something else would be influencing the extra second.</p><p></p><p>Again, the only variable that is inconsistent is Earth's rotation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HAPMinistries, post: 57091590, member: 272496"] Absolutely not. The point is, if you were in perfect time, and I was in perfect time, even though our timing would differ, there would be a perfectly consistent difference. That is what i kept comparing to the Leap Year. You have one every four years, period. You do not have one after 3 years, then after 5 years, then 3 years in a row... no, like clockwork, one every four years. It it was just a timing difference, it would be perfectly predictable. That there is only 1 variable, and I have asked you for any other, and none of our references point to any other variable that would cause time to waiver in an inconsistent pattern. That would be the earth's rotation slowing down. [I]Through the 8 year span of 1972-1979, 9 seconds were gained, but from 1999-today, only 2 seconds have gained.[/I] That is terribly inconsistent. There is a 9 second gain in 8 years, then a 2 second gain over 12, going into 13 years. Using your example, If you counted to 10, .1 seconds faster than me, after counting 10 times, you would perfectly be 1 second faster. After counting 20 times, you would be 2 seconds faster. After counting 30 times, you would be 3 seconds faster. After counting 40 times, you would be 4 seconds faster. After counting 50 times, you would be 5 seconds faster. [B]BUT[/B] If after counting 10 times, you would be 2 seconds faster, then something would be wrong. Something else would be influencing the extra second. Again, the only variable that is inconsistent is Earth's rotation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Abiogenesis/Atheism Fallacy
Top
Bottom