• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

% that accept evolution per state

Status
Not open for further replies.

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It's misleading at the least, by insinuating minors get pregnant in those states rather than adults ages 18-19, and by neglecting to mention that pregnancy rates in general are higher in those states.

So, teen pregnancy has nothing to do with abstinence (instead of normal sex-ed) education?
 
Upvote 0
So, teen pregnancy has nothing to do with abstinence (instead of normal sex-ed) education?

My point is that religious states have the highest pregnancy rates in general. Even data from the Guttmacher Institute shows this. (Finer and Kost, 2011, Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level, pg. 4) States with the highest intended pregnancy rates are as follows:

-Utah: 74%
-Idaho: 65%
-Nevada: 60%
-Arizona: 57%
-Nebraska: 55%
-Texas: 54%
-Minnesota: 54%
-Iowa: 53%
-Alaska: 53%
-New Jersey: 53%
-North Dakota: 52%
-Colorado: 52%
-Kansas: 52%
-South Dakota: 52%
-Wyoming: 52%

More religious states have higher pregnancy rates in general, perhaps because they view children as a blessing rather than a curse.
 
Upvote 0

Queller

I'm where?
May 25, 2012
6,446
681
✟52,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
That's a disingenuous claim, those are states where pregnancy in general is high
That is the point of the map

and teen pregnancy includes those 18-19, not necessarily minors.
True but nobody said anything about minors only.
 
Upvote 0

Queller

I'm where?
May 25, 2012
6,446
681
✟52,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
Then why infer teen pregnancy rates are a bad thing when they involve adults not minors?
Nobody inferred that but YOU. People on this thread are implying that because teen pregnancy doesn't just involve adults. You're also ignoring the correlation between teen pregnancy rates in states that teach abstinence only and those that teach comprehensive sex education.
 
Upvote 0

Why does it have to be one or the other? What about states that teach both abstinence and contraception? Also, since pregnancy rates in general are higher in these states, not just among teens ages 18-19, does that mean you are arguing pregnancy in general is a bad thing? If so, why?
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Why don't you answer the question instead of suggesting that we are arguing that pregnancy in general is bad?

See? I can answer questions with other questions too.
 
Upvote 0
Why don't you answer the question instead of suggesting that we are arguing that pregnancy in general is bad?

See? I can answer questions with other questions too.

I am guessing that pregnancy rates are higher in religious states because marriage rates are higher in those states. The CDC has state statistics for the NVSS on marriages and divorce which seem to bear this out. Highest marriage rates by state in 2011 were as follows:

-Nevada: 36.9
-Hawaii: 17.6
-Arkansas: 10.4
-Tennessee: 9.0
-Utah: 8.6
-Idaho: 8.6
-Alabama: 8.4
-Vermont: 8.3
-Wyoming: 7.8
-Montana: 7.8
-Alaska: 7.8
-South Dakota: 7.5
-Florida: 7.4
-South Carolina: 7.2
-Maine: 7.2
-West Virginia: 7.2
-Texas: 7.1
-New Hampshire: 7.1
-Colorado: 7.0
-Oklahoma: 6.9
-New York: 6.9
-Indiana: 6.8
-North Carolina: 6.7
-North Dakota: 6.7
-Iowa: 6.7
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

You mentioned divorces but left the stats out, so what about them? Are they higher in religious states too? I think so:

 
Upvote 0
Which doesn't necessarily imply it's the religious in those states. Evangelical Christians have one of the lowest divorce rates, just 26%, according to a study by the Barna Group (March 31 2008, New Marriage and Divorce Statistics Released).

Conservatives and Catholics both have rates of 28%. Born again Christians have a slightly lower divorce rate (32%) than the rate for all adults and non-born again Christians, both of which are 33%. Liberals have a divorce rate of 37%. Thus, regardless of state, certain groups of Christians have much lower divorce rates than the general population.
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

So which is it? 26% or 32%? Those are two very different numbers.
 
Upvote 0
So which is it? 26% or 32%? Those are two very different numbers.

According to the study:

 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.