Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is a nonsensical demand for evidence that the poster suggested doesn’t exist.Is this speculation; or do you have a link to support this claim?
Haven't you seen all the restaurants and other small businesses that go to church on Sunday? It's probably why they need such big buildings, to fit all the other smaller buildings in.Wait a moment, what is “a Christian restaurant”?
Oh, are there not minutes of the meeting? Did not his source record the entire interview?This is a nonsensical demand for evidence that the poster suggested doesn’t exist.
That was my best guess too... except thats its just too sad.I'm not 100% positive, but I think he might have been unironically calling hand-holding lewd.
It was not an interview. It was a public school board meeting that was recorded. I've posted the video and given the relevant time marker for what the trustee said on the topic.Oh, are there not minutes of the meeting? Did not his source record the entire interview?
I'm not 100% positive that it wasn't the same sex holding hands under a rainbow.That was my best guess too... except thats its just too sad.
Link?It was not an interview. It was a public school board meeting that was recorded. I've posted the video and given the relevant time marker for what the trustee said on the topic.
Link?
We had gotten to discussing principles that dont rely on this or that classroom poster. At least I think so. I had asked for clarification on a rather cryptic post, but never got it.I'm not 100% positive that it wasn't the same sex holding hands under a rainbow.
I suppose that since these few sketchy news sources are didn't give any fixin's with this nothing burger; that we'll never experience the full flavor of this "story."
I see now. She used that as an example of how parents have ended up in an uproar, that caused the school to move the child to another class, thereby she's calling for the board to draft a standard that complies with the law.Texas first grader traumatized by poster of "different colored children holding hands"; school trustee works to remove such 'ideology' from classrooms
I don't see where the child said what was disturbing about it. A six year-old could be bothered by an image without it having anything to do with whatever message it is conveying. An image of a bunch of dismembered hands, like the one shown in post #4, might just simply look creepy to a six...www.christianforums.com
According to the superintendent, the schools are already complying with the law. The wrongness is the idea that 'all belong here' is a political ideology, and the trustee wants to further expand the application of the law to things as anodyne as this message that should properly be part of civics instruction, not banned as ideology.I see now. She used that as an example of how parents have ended up in an uproar, that caused the school to move the child to another class, thereby she's calling for the board to draft a standard that complies with the law.
What's wrong with that?
Where did she say that?the idea that 'all belong here' is a political ideology,
Why would adults cut microphones off, so that other adults didn’t get upset?
Is this speculation; or do you have a link to support this claim?
Its not meant to be, its an off topic question which I am not obligated toCompelling.
The discussion seemed to center around “how do we fully comply with state law without micromanaging each and every poster or item that might cause a problem”?I see now. She used that as an example of how parents have ended up in an uproar, that caused the school to move the child to another class, thereby she's calling for the board to draft a standard that complies with the law.
What's wrong with that?
Its not meant to be, its an off topic question which I am not obligated to
You could just google (I use duckduckgo, for less censorship) the words, " parents read PQRN school board" just drop the letter Q and replace with O. You should see some from various states, from Florida, Georgia etc. There was one with a young boy reading what he was subject to.
I find it difficult to give someone a way to finding information. Like if you are talking PQRN the word itself is censored here and "inappropriate content" isnt going to convey what it is I am talking about when the word is censored. On the otherhand I also dont have a facebook account so I cant even look in, and Twitter (now X) where I used to find some of the better links/info in various sources has shut me out with a "page not working too many redirects" which started soon after Tucker Carlson moved from Fox to Twitter strangely enough. I think they want people to have an account? You cant post anything you find on BlT-Chute because the links there get censored here and if you use tiny ulr to post to there (to get around that) you will get a strike here for any inappropriate side bar videos that show up on the right side (like they do over at youtube). You can get a Youtube t embed without that sidebar but you cant on that platform and I find the whole thing crazy. And I dont know how to post a video that is supposedly over at instagram or Tik tok because I have no instagram, tik tok or any other accounts. I have to go to Gab social because they are the only platform not censoring and often have some great info. Gab doesnt block people who do not have a membership but I think this place might have a bird if I linked to Gab.
Are you allowed to link to a video of a child before a school board complaining about dirt books in the library where the child is reading the perversion? Will I get a warning by posting a living example of something like that?
The keywords are PARENTS MIC, PQRN. and SCHOOL BOARDS which is just as easy to toss into a search bar and see what comes up. if I used those, just run with my own words and give it a gander, these were viral events they were not hid off in some corner. If I post something from Fox it will likely be rejected so I try to grab a link from various outlets and when I posted only 1 out of 3 linked appropriately because it censors the news stories here because of the WORD PQRN (which is how the news runs it). Its a pain in the rear.If you were say talking about a specific event it would be fairly easy to just name or give a reference to the meeting and date.
So, no it's not that hard to tell people exactly what you are talking about without breaking any of the forums rules.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?