Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Terrorism attack on California power grid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CarlosTomy" data-source="post: 64995155" data-attributes="member: 338149"><p>I believe that Red asked a question that I would personally feel is based on NHE's posting pattern.</p><p></p><p>Again, since there's little "meat" to the point YET (ie we don't know if its terrorism or if its just a malicious electricity geek or what) Red just wanted to point out this crucial fact which was left out of the OP.</p><p></p><p>When I see NHE post something I almost immediately try to figure out what his "angle" is. He has a track record for a posting "method".</p><p></p><p>Now in this case perhaps he just wanted to open the door for debate. Red brought the debate to him by using the same article NHE posted but NHE had cut off the counterpoint.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps if NHE were busy sowing better seeds the harvest he drew in would be more to your liking.</p><p></p><p>NHE posted a one-sided assessment of this and highlighted ONLY those things which agreed with his point. However in the same article the OPPOSING side also is presented which Red pointed out.</p><p></p><p>Again, NHE gets the responses he has programmed everyone to provide because he has set the table. He wishes to eat a different meal then he needs to set the table differently. </p><p></p><p>One normally doesn't just get "attacked" apropos of nothing. It is usually for a "reason".</p><p></p><p>I personally think this newsstory IS interesting and MAY VERY WELL BE an example of a dry-run "terrorist" type attack as you've seen in my posts. But Red was certainly NOT out in the weeds for pointing out how NHE had constructed the OP.</p><p></p><p>And, in a different world, where NHE didn't have a "track record" one could probably give him the benefit of the doubt.</p><p></p><p>But again, as one sows so shall one reap.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CarlosTomy, post: 64995155, member: 338149"] I believe that Red asked a question that I would personally feel is based on NHE's posting pattern. Again, since there's little "meat" to the point YET (ie we don't know if its terrorism or if its just a malicious electricity geek or what) Red just wanted to point out this crucial fact which was left out of the OP. When I see NHE post something I almost immediately try to figure out what his "angle" is. He has a track record for a posting "method". Now in this case perhaps he just wanted to open the door for debate. Red brought the debate to him by using the same article NHE posted but NHE had cut off the counterpoint. Perhaps if NHE were busy sowing better seeds the harvest he drew in would be more to your liking. NHE posted a one-sided assessment of this and highlighted ONLY those things which agreed with his point. However in the same article the OPPOSING side also is presented which Red pointed out. Again, NHE gets the responses he has programmed everyone to provide because he has set the table. He wishes to eat a different meal then he needs to set the table differently. One normally doesn't just get "attacked" apropos of nothing. It is usually for a "reason". I personally think this newsstory IS interesting and MAY VERY WELL BE an example of a dry-run "terrorist" type attack as you've seen in my posts. But Red was certainly NOT out in the weeds for pointing out how NHE had constructed the OP. And, in a different world, where NHE didn't have a "track record" one could probably give him the benefit of the doubt. But again, as one sows so shall one reap. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Terrorism attack on California power grid
Top
Bottom