Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Telegraph: Huge science scandal caused by manipulation of temps for global warming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="leftrightleftrightleft" data-source="post: 67011585" data-attributes="member: 246343"><p>Can you point me to the link on the NASA webpage which has his graph plotted?</p><p></p><p>Did he make the graph himself? Because I can't find it on the NASA webpage.</p><p></p><p>Can you direct me through the set of searches and links I need to go through in order to find the graph he plotted on his webpage? Starting from here: <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/" target="_blank">http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/</a></p><p></p><p>Using the NASA search engine I can find the Puerto Casado analyzed data, the raw data for certain years, and the de-noised data. But I can't find the specific graph which he shows in his blog. The best I can get for raw data is this: <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/find_station.cgi?d=1&ds=0&name=casado" target="_blank">http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/find_station.cgi?d=1&ds=0&name=casado</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, its not like it matters because if you watched the video I posted, this all just comes down to calibration error anyway&#8230;</p><p></p><p>Its also kinda sad. How long did some schmuck spend scouring these temperature records before finding these three Paraguayan results which happen to have downward trending calibration errors? I mean, if this truly was a scam, they should be able to find this kind of "global" downward trend in ALL or MOST of the data, right?</p><p></p><p>But I can play the game too: <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/find_station.cgi?d=1&ds=0&name=edmonton" target="_blank">check out all these graphs of Edmonton, AB, Canada</a>. This is the <strong>raw</strong> data and it clearly shows an upward trend in all the raw data graphs no matter the time window. And obviously this Canadian station and the Paraguayan station are representative of the whole global temperature. Its not like we're picking and choosing or anything, amiright?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="leftrightleftrightleft, post: 67011585, member: 246343"] Can you point me to the link on the NASA webpage which has his graph plotted? Did he make the graph himself? Because I can't find it on the NASA webpage. Can you direct me through the set of searches and links I need to go through in order to find the graph he plotted on his webpage? Starting from here: [url]http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/[/url] Using the NASA search engine I can find the Puerto Casado analyzed data, the raw data for certain years, and the de-noised data. But I can't find the specific graph which he shows in his blog. The best I can get for raw data is this: [url]http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/find_station.cgi?d=1&ds=0&name=casado[/url] Also, its not like it matters because if you watched the video I posted, this all just comes down to calibration error anyway… Its also kinda sad. How long did some schmuck spend scouring these temperature records before finding these three Paraguayan results which happen to have downward trending calibration errors? I mean, if this truly was a scam, they should be able to find this kind of "global" downward trend in ALL or MOST of the data, right? But I can play the game too: [URL="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/find_station.cgi?d=1&ds=0&name=edmonton"]check out all these graphs of Edmonton, AB, Canada[/URL]. This is the [B]raw[/B] data and it clearly shows an upward trend in all the raw data graphs no matter the time window. And obviously this Canadian station and the Paraguayan station are representative of the whole global temperature. Its not like we're picking and choosing or anything, amiright? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Telegraph: Huge science scandal caused by manipulation of temps for global warming
Top
Bottom