Is it moral and ethical for some people to get tax breaks (for children, businesses... whatever) while others who have not made the same decisions in their lives fund these breaks?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
agreed.I believe there are too many different tax breaks to say all are or aren't ethical. Individually I find many business tax breaks tend to be the ones that cost the majority the most and are the most questionable.
In principle we do it because there is a benefit to the whole society in doing so.Is it moral and ethical for some people to get tax breaks (for children, businesses... whatever) while others who have not made the same decisions in their lives fund these breaks?
The single young person, such as myself, gets a pretty rough deal really. Not only do we have to pay for other peoples benefits, we have to pay for the schools that the parents send their kids to, as well as paying for hospitals that we likely use much less than anyone else. I'm not saying it is wrong that we have to subsidise everyone else, just that we get a pretty rough deal.
But of course, you weren't paying when you were a child and going to school, and you won't be paying when you're elderly and using the hospitals. We pay tax at the times when we need the services they pay for least, but over the course of our lives, things seem to balance out.
I realise this, although we wont have a state pension by the time we get to retirement, and who knows whether the NHS will still be running once my health starts deteriorating with old age.
Don't get me wrong, i'm happy to pay (sort of), im just not convinced it will balance out, especially if i never have kids.
If you don't have children, it probably won't.
However, I suppose the way to look at it is that the kids you're paying to educate are tomorrow's police people, shop keepers, fire fighters, doctors, nurses, captains of industry, &c. It'd be a pretty miserable world if everyone just looked after themselves, even for the people at the top. Our society is a better place for everyone because everyone is (at least in theory) looked after.
Which is not really suprising, since it was usually them who got to design the system in the first place.In the history of the world every economic system ended up with the rich getting richer.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. But I think we are due for a complete overhaul of our taxation system.

that's another thread entirely. personally I think we should fund very minimally to the federal government (i.e. let's downsize and give more power to the states where it belongs)If you have no taxation, then how will you fund the government?
Is it moral and ethical for some people to get tax breaks (for children, businesses... whatever) while others who have not made the same decisions in their lives fund these breaks?