- Feb 5, 2002
- 186,896
- 69,129
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
On Nov. 30, 1981, I skipped school to attend my first Rolling Stones concert at the now demolished Pontiac Silverdome. The band members were then on the cusp of turning 40-years-old and even back then critics were accusing them of being “too old to Rock-n-Roll,” the band was gamely promoting their latest album Tattoo You, which included “Start Me Up,” among other memorable hits.
Thanks to the “festival seating,” my perch was in the upper reaches of the venue, an unheated concrete monstrosity. I had several hours on my frozen hands before the “warm up” act, hometown lad Iggy Pop, entered the stage to a chorus of boos and tossed shoes. (Iggy was not yet an icon; and the next act, Santana, was far better received.) So, in between nodding off and pondering what songs the Stones would play, I contemplated the cover of Tattoo You.
The album’s front cover is adorned with an artist’s rendering of Mick Jagger’s face covered with tattoos, and on the back is a similar one of Keith Richards. (By that time in the band’s history, Mick and Keith must have felt no need for Ron Wood, Bill Wyman, and Charlie Watts to grace the cover, too.) My overriding thought was, “Who would get a tattoo, other than a sailor or a carnival worker?”
Over 40 years later, attending a Rolling Stones concert at Chicago’s Soldier Field, where the band was once more gamely promoting a new album, Hackney Diamonds, my high-school self would have been shocked by the answer: while the album cover did not have any pictures of the octogenarian leaders of the band, Mick and Keith, the crowd was awash in tattoos, especially on the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the Stones’ original Baby Boomer fans.
Continued below.
Tattoo Who? - Chronicles
The rising popularity of body art is an attempt to express individuality that usually collapses into shallow conformity.