Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah, speaking of that Water Canopy, lets hear what a scientist think about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvprBLhJx_o
Which could have gotten on the Ark through the window.Yes, crazy weird creatures, like "dove" and "raven."
Which could have gotten on the Ark through the window.
I said we wouldn't recognize half of them. The other half, the ones we would recognize, could include the dove and the raven.Not quite what I was getting at. And no doubt they could have gotten on the Ark through the window, but I would have thought if we're going for literalism then there would be only two of each kind, no hitchhikers.
But I digress.
You say the animals on the ark wouldn't have been recognisable, but the only specific species/kinds/whatchamacallems mentioned by name are two of the same we have today. Ok, maybe some animals would be different but to have two birds cited that are named exactly as today? And I'm sure there were others...
Why not something completely unrecognisable (it'd have to be given it's all evolving in a much shorter timespan using methods unfeasible according to science)?
I said we wouldn't recognize half of them. The other half, the ones we would recognize, could include the dove and the raven.
And what's wrong with having two birds cited as today? Are you saying that they should have further microevolved and eventually gone extinct by now?
It may not have occurred to you yet, junior member, that I actually agree with most of what science says.
My favorite way of expressing the fallacy of your thinking is is this way:
- Expecting to use the Bible as a science book is like expecting to build a computer with Bill Gate's diary.
Well, whatever it is/was, I don't think T. Rex boarded the Ark. Like I've said before, if we were there in person, and actually witnessed the animals getting on the Ark, I wonder if we would even recognize half of them.
Although, Hovind's ice theory is rather strange,
there are too many things regarding volume of water rates prior to the flood that are notbeing addressed.
Nah, my forefathers just blew them to bits. After selling them ammo of course (or so the legend goes). Wouldn't want to blow someone to bits before making a profit of them . They were dutch after allAccording to a recent program on the History Channel, the Spanish Armada was defeated by sailing into, and trying to avoid, an ice storm generated by a mini ice age.
No, they didn't. Study how the Spanish Armada really was "defeated". Your forefathers put the Armada to flight, but the sockdolager came later.Nah, my forefathers just blew them to bits.
Well, whatever it is/was, I don't think T. Rex boarded the Ark. Like I've said before, if we were there in person, and actually witnessed the animals getting on the Ark, I wonder if we would even recognize half of them.
It means every creature alive at the time (obviously).The word "every" appears in every translation I could find. Not "some", but "every". This contradicts your assertion that T-rex was not on board the ark.
It means every creature alive at the time (obviously).
And for the record --- okay --- let's assume T. Rex was aboard the Ark --- what about it?
Wow --- give you a dinosaur, and you take the whole animal kingdom!And every last obscure species of Brazilian bark beetle from deep in the jungle. Penguins! Wombats. Dall Sheep from Alaska.
No --- remember there was only one supercontinent at the time. There was no Australia until Genesis 10 or 11.Well, do you find it likely that marsupials like the kangaroo, the Tasmanian devil, and the wallaby all swam to Australia after the flood and nowhere else?
No --- remember there was only one supercontinent at the time. There was no Australia until Genesis 10 or 11.
Either that, or their "kinds" did --- yes.So the kangaroo, Tasmanian devil, and wallaby all happened to end up on the one part of the supercontinent that turned into Australia? But nowhere else at all?
So the kangaroo, Tasmanian devil, and wallaby all happened to end up on the one part of the supercontinent that turned into Australia? But nowhere else at all?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?