- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,553
- 52,498
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Don't know --- I wasn't there.how did tropical animals and insects live then?
No.also, does it say in the bible that the climate changed in the way you say it did?
Or the notion that God not creating a pebble is absurd,
and God not creating Life is absurd and God not creating the Sun is most absurd
The more evidence you bring to the table,
because of order and complexity and atomic structure, it just screams out Creator even
The people I email and talk to are sacred to me. I would NOT betray them by name dropping.
I remember him now. If you had said Kent Hovind, the guy who had to declare chapter 11 and was in all kinds of trouble, then I would have probably remembered.
It has nothing to do with whether the evidence should be interpreted with the absolute knowledge of the existence of God as the Creator.
T. Rex wasn't on the Ark, in my opinion, his kind was.
Now I don't understand what your asking. The dinosaur kinds that disembarked the Ark after the Flood lived their lives and died --- probably in the Ice Age that immediately followed.
WHICH Ice Age, we have a recent record of at least 6 in the past 650,000 years!
Maybe they lived about a thousand years afterward, then died out.
Maybe you have no evidence again, so you're bluffing?
When the Water Canopy was broken up and rained on the earth in Noah's time, the earth took on a whole new climate --- and the early years would have generated a massive Ice Age on the earth that the animals that disembarked couldn't handle.
Maybe if you scrunched those 650,000 thousand years into 6100 years, you'd have one big one?WHICH Ice Age, we have a recent record of at least 6 in the past 650,000 years!
Maybe you don't either?Maybe you have no evidence again, so you're bluffing?
Science can take a hike.Yeah, speaking of that Water Canopy, lets hear what a scientist think about it...
None of the above --- QV please.
In early Genesis, the kinds are not easily identified, as they probably only lived for one or two generations - (but their lifespans were very long).
They would have been of the more docile, domestic kind, and certainly would not have included carnivores in their incipient stages.
These may have included such creatures as the winged horse, but that's just a guess.
These kinds would have included the animals that are not currently mentioned in man's taxons; such as behemoth, leviathan, fowled bats, four-legged grasshoppers, satyrs, unicorns, et. al.
Maybe if you scrunched those 650,000 thousand years into 6100 years, you'd have one big one?
Maybe you don't either?
How would I know? Or you? Adam was told to name the animals, and he did so. I don't thing taxonomy was a science back then.So this would make 'kind' = Phylum then??
Who on earth made this statement???"A kind is a plant or animal at the top of God's taxon that contains all the genetic blueprints necessary to replenish the earth as God intended."
Either that, nor no lion at all --- yet.Right, a big lion with nice huge flesh ripping incisors to eat cabbage with, huh? No wonder people mock your religion at times.
Yesiree.A winged horse huh?
Nosiree.Evidence for this?
But an educated guess at that.Or the Cockatrice? Satyrs? Unicorn? thought not... A guess indeed.
Big deal --- you can't find Jimmy Hoffa's, either.Funny how we don't find any fossil or genetic evidence for any of the creatures mentioned in the bible, huh?
Yes, it did; but being's they're not writing science, but making entries in Someone's Diary, it doesn't matter.Did it ever occur to to you that the biblical authors obviously had no clue in terms of biology?
They weren't told to think it --- they were told to do it --- then write it down. (Actually, this was a one-time occurence by one man: Jacob.)That would go a long way to explaining why they thought presenting striped patterns to a animal would result in it giving striped patterns of its offspring.
Again, they weren't asked if they agreed with what they were writing --- they just wrote it.Or why they defined bats as birds and all insects as having 4 legs.
It may not have occurred to you yet, junior member, that I actually agree with most of what science says. All you see here in these posts is where I disagree.Wrong, we do. It's called Ice Cores, from which we can obtain the atmospheric conditions for the past 650,000 years. Where is your evidence for an Ice Age(s) in the Bible? If you're literalist, then the sly interpretations, if the bible never mentions it/them, then you shouldn't be posturing as if it does.
How would I know?
Who on earth made this statement???
Either that, nor no lion at all --- yet.
Yesiree.
But an educated guess at that.
Big deal --- you can't find Jimmy Hoffa's, either.
(Actually, this was a one-time occurence by one man: Jacob.)
Again, they weren't asked if they agreed with what they were writing --- they just wrote it.
My favorite way of expressing the fallacy of your thinking is is this way:I thought you had the omnipotent and infallible word of God, shouldn't you be wise to such things, or does it not offer hope in this arena of knowledge?
Well, whatever it is/was, I don't think T. Rex boarded the Ark. Like I've said before, if we were there in person, and actually witnessed the animals getting on the Ark, I wonder if we would even recognize half of them.BTW,"kind" is usually synonymous with "genus" in my opinion.
~Michael
Well, whatever it is/was, I don't think T. Rex boarded the Ark. Like I've said before, if we were there in person, and actually witnessed the animals getting on the Ark, I wonder if we would even recognize half of them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?