• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Hi there,

So, simple truth:
Syncopating competing "evolutions", can't happen without "design"

The idea is simply this: if you have differing members of a species, all intent on winning the same mate, that mate won't be able to bond with a particular member (of the species) without a) comparing her design with his, b) prompting his design with hers and c) staying true to both their designs together.

In other words, "evolution" may be the competing idea behind advancing survival, but it is not the final word, nor can it rule further word out - whether "evolution" does well or not, still depends on "design".

If you can understand this, you will understand why it is that Creationists, can't simply "forget design" however intelligent it may be, for taking a chance on Evolution, however poorly it may be thought out.

Design does not prove God exists, any more than it suggests God inserted design where it was strategically ingenuous - the choice between design and evolution has always existed, it is God that keeps its potential relevance in view, for those things He wants to have Created. Saying you can orient to being hunted on your own, is like saying you want to take a chance with your life, because you "like" it (the life). People may flock to being "evolutionistic" but in the end, that makes you more prey to the Devil than anything else.

Lord forgive us for putting our Evolution before others and for defaming Creation as being weaker than us, help us to find your seed, that we may grow by it - in Your Name Amen.
 

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,474
4,012
47
✟1,118,529.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens

Nonsense.

Once again you are misusing the terms and concepts about evolution.

Evolution isn't a choice, it isn't a philosophy, it isn't a possession, it isn't a trait and it doesn't apply to individuals.

You've been told this before. It's dishonest and disrespectful to keep repeating these lies on the forum.
 
Reactions: kiwimac
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic

If two creatures mate at a different rate to each other, they will never have children - that's just a fact.
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Please pray for an understanding of evolution. It will get you a lot further than your continual misreprentations.
 
Reactions: kiwimac
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,790
52,555
Guam
✟5,135,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is true.

But why would different members of a species vie for the same mate?

Why, for instance, would a bull even want to compete with a stallion for a mare?

Or is that the point you're making? that syncopation prevents it?
 
Reactions: Gottservant
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,141.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
If two creatures mate at a different rate to each other, they will never have children - that's just a fact.

That makes no sense. There is no mating at a different rate. Different animals have a different gestation period, that is a fact, but mating is just... I don't think I can make the joke I want to make on this site. But in animals it's very quick.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,141.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
So either way = no children.

I don't get how you got that from what I said. There is no mating a different rates. There is either mating or no mating. It's a very abstract and binary concept.
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,474
4,012
47
✟1,118,529.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
If two creatures mate at a different rate to each other, they will never have children - that's just a fact.
What do you mean by "mate at a different rate"?

If creatures can't mate then they are different species, and they aren't going to have descendants to evolve.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
This is either begging the question (circular argument) or equivocation of 'design' (or both), but it still manages to be a nonsensical description of sexual selection.
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
This is true.

But why would different members of a species vie for the same mate?

Why, for instance, would a bull even want to compete with a stallion for a mare?

Or is that the point you're making? that syncopation prevents it?

That's right, syncopation only happens within the species.

Design is a foregone conclusion, because it helps mates focus on their love.

It's like starting a fire, you don't wait to see the flame, you start making sparks.
 
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Cicadas can mate in two different mating periods, because there is a variation of a common design.

If cicadas tried to mutate their mating period, they would die - there would be no one to mate with them.

Your idea that "some would mutate the right period, and others would not" defeats the whole purpose of mating in numbers.

If mating in numbers, is by design, then you can build on what you think is the right period for you (given feedback about what your options are).
 
Upvote 0