• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Swetnick Claims change during NBC Interview as Past History of False Claims Surfaces

Is Kavanaugh being falsely accused?

  • Yes, and it is very effective.

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • No, Swetnick just needed to review her affidavit before the interview

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, Swetnick and Ford made the classic mistake of naming witnesses that could corroborate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but I believe people are guilty until proven innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3

Uber Genius

"Super Genius"
Aug 13, 2016
2,921
1,244
Kentucky
✟64,539.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Earlier this week MSNBC broadcast an interview between Kate Snow and Julie Swetnick, the third accuser of Brett Kavanaugh.

“NBC News, for the record, has not been able to independently verify her claims. There are things she told us on camera that differ from her written statements last week,” Snow noted prior to the interview’s airing."

In her affidavit Swetnick stated, "I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lining up outside of rooms at many of these parties waiting their "turn" with a girl inside the room."

Swetnick told Snow that the boys were not in a line, “but definitely huddled by doors.”

She added that she believed, in hindsight, that Kavanaugh had been “involved in this behavior.”

“I would say yes. It’s just too coincidental,”

Despite reaching out to all Swetnick's witnesses NBC was unable to corroborate any of her claims, receiving flat denials from some witnesses. Sound familiar?

In her affidavit she claims to have attended these parties ten times from 1981-1983. However, she claims in 1982 she was gang-raped at one of the parties.

1 - So knowing that gang-rape was going on and people were being drugged she continued to attend these parties???

2 - Even after being gang-raped at the gang-rape parties she continued to attend gang-rape parties?

3 - An ex-boyfriend claims he broke off a relationship with her because she claimed to have had, and be interested in, sex with multiple men.

4 - Former fellow employees at a company she worked at lodged sexual harassment claims against her accusing her of unwanted advances.

Swetnick is making the porn star, Stormie Daniels, look like a woman of sterling character.

AP Investigation

"Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority."

"In its civil complaint in a state court in Oregon, the company said Swetnick, a software engineer, was an employee for a few weeks before its human resources department received a report that she had engaged in “unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” toward two male co-workers at a business lunch."

"The lawsuit said that Swetnick in turn accused Webtrends of subjecting her to “physically and emotionally threatening and hostile conditions” and that she claimed that she’d been sexually harassed by four co-workers. The co-workers denied the allegations, the suit said."

"Company officials later determined, the suit said, that Swetnick had provided false information on her employment application. The suit alleged that she had misrepresented the length of time she worked at a previous employer and falsely claimed that she’d earned an undergraduate degree in biology and chemistry from Johns Hopkins University."

"Swetnick was on the other side of a civil case in 1994, as a plaintiff, when she filed a personal injury lawsuit in Maryland against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. She claimed she lost more than $420,000 in earnings after she hurt her nose in a fall on a train in 1992."

"Swetnick, who described herself in court records as a model and actor, claimed she had “numerous modeling commitments” with several companies at the time of the accident but missed out them because of her injuries."

"To support her claim for lost wages, Swetnick named “Konam Studios” as one of the companies promising to employ her. A court filing identified Nam Ko, a representative of “Kunam Studios,” as a possible plaintiff’s witness for her case."

"Ko, however, told AP on Friday that he was just a friend of Swetnick’s and that he had never owned a company with a name spelled either way and had never agreed to pay her money for any work before she injured her nose. He said he first met Swetnick at a bar more than a year after her alleged accident."

“I didn’t have any money back then. I (was) broke as can be,” Ko said.

Ko said he has a hazy memory of Swetnick asking to use him as a “character reference” but doesn’t recall hearing about her lawsuit.

“I thought it was for a job application,” he said.

So Swetnick was willing to fabricate a fictitious story in order to defraud the defendant of $452,000.

And her lawyer claims "Those cases are not relevant."

Wonder how she is getting paid this time?

Perhaps a book deal from Simon and Schuster?


For more info:

Julie Swetnick, 3rd Kavanaugh Accuser, Speaks Out In NBC Interview

https://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2018/09/26/1537984515-swetnickstatement.pdf

3rd Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes
 
Last edited:

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Golly, nobody could’ve predicted this.
Just making the Senators who supported her testifying before the Judiciary committee that much more believable. /s Wow!
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Earlier this week MSNBC broadcast an interview between Kate Snow and Julie Swetnick, the third accuser of Brett Kavanaugh.

“NBC News, for the record, has not been able to independently verify her claims. There are things she told us on camera that differ from her written statements last week,” Snow noted prior to the interview’s airing."

In her affidavit Swetnick stated, "I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lining up outside of rooms at many of these parties waiting their "turn" with a girl inside the room."

Swetnick told Snow that the boys were not in a line, “but definitely huddled by doors.”

She added that she believed, in hindsight, that Kavanaugh had been “involved in this behavior.”

“I would say yes. It’s just too coincidental,”

Despite reaching out to all Swetnick's witnesses NBC was unable to corroborate any of her claims, receiving flat denials from some witnesses. Sound familiar?

In her affidavit she claims to have attended these parties ten times from 1981-1983. However, she claims in 1982 she was gang-raped at one of the parties.

1 - So knowing that gang-rape was going on and people were being drugged she continued to attend these parties???

2 - Even after being gang-raped at the gang-rape parties she continued to attend gang-rape parties?

3 - An ex-boyfriend claims he broke off a relationship with her because she claimed to have had, and be interested in, sex with multiple men.

4 - Former fellow employees at a company she worked at lodged sexual harassment claims against her accusing her of unwanted advances.

Swetnick is making the porn star, Stormie Daniels, look like a woman of sterling character.

AP Investigation

"Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority."

"In its civil complaint in a state court in Oregon, the company said Swetnick, a software engineer, was an employee for a few weeks before its human resources department received a report that she had engaged in “unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” toward two male co-workers at a business lunch."

"The lawsuit said that Swetnick in turn accused Webtrends of subjecting her to “physically and emotionally threatening and hostile conditions” and that she claimed that she’d been sexually harassed by four co-workers. The co-workers denied the allegations, the suit said."

"Company officials later determined, the suit said, that Swetnick had provided false information on her employment application. The suit alleged that she had misrepresented the length of time she worked at a previous employer and falsely claimed that she’d earned an undergraduate degree in biology and chemistry from Johns Hopkins University."

"Swetnick was on the other side of a civil case in 1994, as a plaintiff, when she filed a personal injury lawsuit in Maryland against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. She claimed she lost more than $420,000 in earnings after she hurt her nose in a fall on a train in 1992."

"Swetnick, who described herself in court records as a model and actor, claimed she had “numerous modeling commitments” with several companies at the time of the accident but missed out them because of her injuries."

"To support her claim for lost wages, Swetnick named “Konam Studios” as one of the companies promising to employ her. A court filing identified Nam Ko, a representative of “Kunam Studios,” as a possible plaintiff’s witness for her case."

"Ko, however, told AP on Friday that he was just a friend of Swetnick’s and that he had never owned a company with a name spelled either way and had never agreed to pay her money for any work before she injured her nose. He said he first met Swetnick at a bar more than a year after her alleged accident."

“I didn’t have any money back then. I (was) broke as can be,” Ko said.

Ko said he has a hazy memory of Swetnick asking to use him as a “character reference” but doesn’t recall hearing about her lawsuit.

“I thought it was for a job application,” he said.

So Swetnick was willing to fabricate a fictitious story in order to defraud the defendant of $452,000.

And her lawyer claims "Those cases are not relevant."

Wonder how she is getting paid this time?

Perhaps a book deal from Simon and Schuster?


For more info:

Julie Swetnick, 3rd Kavanaugh Accuser, Speaks Out In NBC Interview

https://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2018/09/26/1537984515-swetnickstatement.pdf

3rd Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes
Playing the nuclear hand in a mid-term election. Seems to be backfiring:

Just over a month away from critical elections across the country, the wide Democratic enthusiasm advantage that has defined the 2018 campaign up to this point has disappeared, according to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll.

In July, there was a 10-point gap between the number of Democrats and Republicans saying the November elections were "very important." Now, that is down to 2 points, a statistical tie.
Poll: Amid Kavanaugh Confirmation Battle, Democratic Enthusiasm Edge Evaporates

Nice charts at the link above.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber Genius
Upvote 0

Uber Genius

"Super Genius"
Aug 13, 2016
2,921
1,244
Kentucky
✟64,539.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Playing the nuclear hand in a mid-term election. Seems to be backfiring:

Just over a month away from critical elections across the country, the wide Democratic enthusiasm advantage that has defined the 2018 campaign up to this point has disappeared, according to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll.

In July, there was a 10-point gap between the number of Democrats and Republicans saying the November elections were "very important." Now, that is down to 2 points, a statistical tie.
Poll: Amid Kavanaugh Confirmation Battle, Democratic Enthusiasm Edge Evaporates

Nice charts at the link above.
I have voted in every election since 1979. This is an important one to be sure. However I abandoned my Republican affiliation years ago do to do-nothing politics as ussual at state and National levels. I didn't vote for Trump because of his obviously detractors. I wrote in Rick Santorum, but am anxious to support Trump's agendaas he has proven the single most effective president in my lifetime. It is astounding what he has accomplished despite mob rule on the left and Dems colluding at the DOJ and FBI.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0