Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It must be nice to win arguments by making claims without actually supporting any of it.
What does that have to do with evolution allegedly being false, exactly?
where in the Bible there is a biological or (a) reincarnational evolution?!, there is no such a thing, but it is quite visible that until now there have been only 5-6 millennia counted from the beginning onward(-s), and that there is no a rebirth/reincarnation in principle
Hebrews 9:24-28 "For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation."
Blessings
Oh, it's "deduction", is it? So, since we see microevolution, then macroevolution just *must* happen. Is that it? Yeah, that means you only have an assumption.It must be nice to think you can say something isn't supported simply because you utterly refuse to deduce anything from what is given., even when it is deduced for you.
Oh, it's "deduction", is it? So, since we see microevolution, then macroevolution just *must* happen. Is that it? Yeah, that means you only have an assumption.
It's easy to hide behind broad over-reaching generalizations.Well it's a far better explanation then what you or any other anti-evolutionist comes up with.
I guess change doesn't cause change. It just causes nothing, because that's what causation does- nothing.
I assume that by hitting a ball with a bat will send the ball away, but hey, just an assumption right?
Drive a car. I have no evidence to suggest that the gas meter is going to go down the more you drive it outside of the simple observation that your car consumes gas for energy.
Since you deny that observation, there is absolutely no other evidence I can give to suggest that your car will eventually run out of gas.
That is how it is like to argue with creatioinists. Mutations occur, and then they keep occuring, and even then, they keep occuring. What happens to the body eventually? Does it stay the same?
It is a ridiculous claim which goes against basic physics. But for people who deny gravity as well, that isn't such a big deal, is it?
So, your complete misrepresentation is dually noted
Oh, it's "deduction", is it? So, since we see microevolution, then macroevolution just *must* happen. Is that it? Yeah, that means you only have an assumption.
Well it's a far better explanation then what you or any other anti-evolutionist comes up with.
I guess change doesn't cause change. It just causes nothing, because that's what causation does- nothing.
I assume that by hitting a ball with a bat will send the ball away, but hey, just an assumption right?
Micro- causing macroevolution? I'm still waiting for your demonstration of such.
You don't have to observe macroevolution to know that it is a fact.
I see that there is no convincing YEC's. Nothing can, because they choose not to see reason.
They just see a Bronze Age interpretation of God breathed words.
Remember that the same people, with their archaic and otherwise lacking knowledge, drew up the world and Heavens as they saw it in the Bible- it resembled something like a snowglobe.
Why not just state "you don't have to define macroevolution nor use meaningful terms to have a meaningful conversation."
Well let's try having an indepth convo then. All I've gotten is 'pics or it didn't happen'. I haven't exactly gotten anything in return to the OP that is tangible for discussion.All that has happened here, is speaking past one another.
Not when it comes to venturing upon the science of the Bible. Bronze Age people didn't know what we know now, and so their interpretation was off.Sorry mon frer - it is seeing the text as the original audience heard it that would bring enlightenment here! (Bronze Age interp would be progress)
Honestly, I've almost given up trying to explain what I see in Genesis, because YEC's don't want to open their eyes to it. Period.
That is why young Earth creatoinism is still around. Otherwise, it would have been long gone for the absurdity that it is when faced with reason and fact.
I mean, look at this thread for example. You all can't even get passed the basic, so how does one explain the more complicated?
You all pretty much make God the author of confusion, because to blive everything was created in six days is complete lunacy.
Saying the same thing over and over again does not make it it true. No matter how much you point at Scripture, all you are really doing is pointing at your frustratingly dumbed down, literal, shallow view of it.
Should've known it was a mistake to even attempt to have an intelligible discussion, because there is nothing intelligible about young Earth creationism. People who labor under such delusions are impossible to speak to. I think that such claims of origins being literal is frankly an insult to Christianity.
If macroevolutionism would be plausible, it has NOT happened yet, due to the truth of Biblical record, that all living systems were created thousands of years ago,
the Biblical record speaks of all living biological systems starting out in full maturity, by the Supernatural works of God, therefore again, macroevolution has not yet had enough time to fully function, because in itself, it is only thousands of years old.
This has nothing to do with young earth or universe, only God knows how long expanse of time the universe NONbiological existed, but GOD made it very clear that LIVING biological systems are definately young.
Hey, be scientific. That is the only way for you to convince anyone.
You ran away from my question: human mutates, but human does not evolve. What can you say?
Don't run. Face this question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?