- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,404
- 27,063
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are there any who are blocked?A tweet from a member of Congress (and a conservative Republican at that), so much for #3.
Sure. He so much worse than a communist dictator.Big tech finally held trump accountable.
Scalise is simply admitting trump's online behavior was worse than autocrats and terrorists across the world. Like a child with no inhibitions.

Has the communist dictator made posts that break the rules of Twitter?Sure. He so much worse than a communist dictator.![]()
#supportthecommunistsHas the communist dictator made posts that break the rules of Twitter?
Being on Twitter isn't determined by one's character but simply by what one posts on Twitter. It's all about one's behavior on Twitter not anywhere else.
I always find it interesting when conservatives want more regulation when they say that is exacting what they are against. Democracy, freedom of speech and expression, but more regulation of the same?#supportthecommunists
Where did I say I wanted more regulations?I always find it interesting when conservatives want more regulation when they say that is exacting what they are against. Democracy, freedom of speech and expression, but more regulation of the same?
Are there any who are blocked?
I don’t know. That’s why I asked.But that's not what Scalise said. He said "Members of Congress are blocked". He didn't give names or say "some" or "some GOP" members. All his other examples of the blocked (Trump, Babylon Bee) and unblocked (CCP, Taliban, the Ayatolah) are specific individuals/accounts.
Which "members" are blocked?
Where did I say I wanted more regulations?
And if I am a company with a platform, say, like a newpaper or website, facebook twitter, etc. -- you still don't have a right to force your own words into my platform unless I choose to allow you to publish there.
I don’t know. That’s why I asked.
However, he was correct on the other points.
Yessir, hence the trump ban on socials.Sure. He so much worse than a communist dictator.![]()
It sounds like you want Twitter regulated, telling them who they can ban and who they can't. Do you think they should change their rules for using their site?Where did I say I wanted more regulations?
I do agree that Twitter is too aggressive in its banning policies. However, the conservative principle here is that Twitter can ban anyone they want for any reason and if enough people don't like it the platform will have to change its stance to survive. Many conservatives are using other platforms or complying with the rules to get back on. My question to progressives is do they believe the same thing? If a private platform is ok with comments against trans people are they ok with that?