What amazes me is we have folks arguing that there is no healing in the atonement or it might be provided time after time but we have yet to see them go through the scriptures thoroughly and give a large list of scriptures saying why it is not guaranteed in the atonement.
The word all is used so often in the Bible in relation to healing why do you think that is?
Originally Posted by irenemcg
What amazes me is we have folks arguing that there is no healing in the atonement or it might be provided time after time but we have yet to see them go through the scriptures thoroughly and give a large list of scriptures saying why it is not guaranteed in the atonement.
The word all is used so often in the Bible in relation to healing why do you think that is?
If you or anyone else could name me just ONE person whose faith allowed them to live past 120 years after God said man would not, then I will go and sit down and become a WOF'er myself.
The word all is used so often in the Bible in relation to healing why do you think that is?
Some people just don't get it....
Could someone, ANYONE point to any one person who believes that we should never die? Hands? Anyone believe something remotely resembling this? No?
Then why the heck is it constantly brought up in these threads? Can you say, transparent strawman?
People die. Yep. It's true. It's a result of the fall of man, which can be clearly seen in Genesis 3. What is not clearly spelled out in Genesis 3 is that sickness was a result of the fall. No matter how much reasoning you do, it doesn't change the fact that God did not specify sickness as a consequence of the fall of man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?