- Jan 15, 2004
- 1,526
- 72
- 43
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
Hey everyone,
There seems to be a lot of reasonable people here, so maybe ya'll can help me here.
I have always believed that honesty is the best policy, but I've run into a situation that's frankly stumped me. Basically, I'm trying to decide how far I should be willing to "spin" the truth at the request of my boss. I am not really being asked to lie outright.
See, I work for a large corporation managing the engineering documentation (like blueprints, and machine operation manuals) at one of their plants. The corporation has a records retention policy about how long papers and computer files and other records can be kept, and how they are to be maintained. So in a week or two we are going to have an audit to see if we are in compliance with the policy.
Here's where the problem starts: It's literally impossible for us to follow the exact directions of the policy. It is apparent that whoever wrote the policy had no idea of the nature of engineering documentation. However, we are in compliance with the "spirit of the law," and in fact, we are far closer to compliance than almost any other plant in the corporation.
The one thing that is specified that we cant do is to do a yearly internal audit of all our records. We would have to either shut down all our operations for at least a month or hire an other person just for this job in order to do this. Our method is to constantly be internally auditing small sections of our information, which accomplishes the same thing. But the corporation auditors probably wont understand this, so my boss told me to tell them that we do conduct an annual audit if they ask me.
So heres my dilemma: I dont want to lie, but I also dont want to get my boss in trouble when he hasn't really done anything wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Evan
There seems to be a lot of reasonable people here, so maybe ya'll can help me here.
I have always believed that honesty is the best policy, but I've run into a situation that's frankly stumped me. Basically, I'm trying to decide how far I should be willing to "spin" the truth at the request of my boss. I am not really being asked to lie outright.
See, I work for a large corporation managing the engineering documentation (like blueprints, and machine operation manuals) at one of their plants. The corporation has a records retention policy about how long papers and computer files and other records can be kept, and how they are to be maintained. So in a week or two we are going to have an audit to see if we are in compliance with the policy.
Here's where the problem starts: It's literally impossible for us to follow the exact directions of the policy. It is apparent that whoever wrote the policy had no idea of the nature of engineering documentation. However, we are in compliance with the "spirit of the law," and in fact, we are far closer to compliance than almost any other plant in the corporation.
The one thing that is specified that we cant do is to do a yearly internal audit of all our records. We would have to either shut down all our operations for at least a month or hire an other person just for this job in order to do this. Our method is to constantly be internally auditing small sections of our information, which accomplishes the same thing. But the corporation auditors probably wont understand this, so my boss told me to tell them that we do conduct an annual audit if they ask me.
So heres my dilemma: I dont want to lie, but I also dont want to get my boss in trouble when he hasn't really done anything wrong. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Evan