Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Stars science say kicked out of galaxy actually coming in!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RealityCheck01" data-source="post: 73574279" data-attributes="member: 317334"><p>Misleading lurkers with an obvious "circular reasoning" lie when it is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder" target="_blank"><u>cosmic distance <strong>ladder</strong></u></a>, <strong>dad</strong>.</p><p></p><p>The science for lurkers:</p><p>This is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder" target="_blank">cosmic distance <strong>ladder</strong></a> and its linear reasoning truth.</p><p>Rung 1: We use parallax to measure the distance to stars <strong>inside this galaxy</strong> . Some of these stars are standard candles (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable" target="_blank"><u>Cepheid variable</u></a> stars).</p><p>Rung 2: Those standard candles are then used to measure distances to <strong>other galaxies</strong>. Some of these galaxies contain standard candles such as Type 1a supernova.</p><p>Rung 3: Those standard candles allow the measurement of distances to more distant galaxies.</p><p>Each rung builds on the previous rung. We do not use <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 204)">Cepheid variable</span></u></a> stars to do parallax measurements. We do not use Type 1a supernova to measure the distances to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 204)">Cepheid variable</span></u></a> stars or do parallax measurements. Thus "circular reasoning" is an obvious lie.</p><p></p><p>This is a basic list - there are up to 26 "rungs": <a href="http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/distance.htm" target="_blank"><u>The ABC's of Distances</u>.</a></p><p></p><p>Edwin Hubble famously used <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 204)">Cepheid variable</span></u></a> stars to measure the distance to galaxies and measured their redshift. That gave the Hubble–Lemaître law. Add 80 years of measurements and there is an enormous body of evidence that this law is correct. Thus it is a convention in astronomy to write the distances to galaxies as redshifts using the symbol z.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.quora.com/How-is-it-possible-to-measure-astronomical-distances-using-the-Doppler-effect-when-the-speed-of-light-is-always-constant-regardless-of-the-source-and-the-observers-motion" target="_blank">How is it possible to measure astronomical distances using the Doppler effect when the speed of light is always constant, regardless of the source and the observers motion?</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RealityCheck01, post: 73574279, member: 317334"] Misleading lurkers with an obvious "circular reasoning" lie when it is the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder'][U]cosmic distance [B]ladder[/B][/U][/URL], [B]dad[/B]. The science for lurkers: This is the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder']cosmic distance [B]ladder[/B][/URL] and its linear reasoning truth. Rung 1: We use parallax to measure the distance to stars [B]inside this galaxy[/B] . Some of these stars are standard candles ([URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable'][U]Cepheid variable[/U][/URL] stars). Rung 2: Those standard candles are then used to measure distances to [B]other galaxies[/B]. Some of these galaxies contain standard candles such as Type 1a supernova. Rung 3: Those standard candles allow the measurement of distances to more distant galaxies. Each rung builds on the previous rung. We do not use [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable'][U][COLOR=rgb(0, 102, 204)]Cepheid variable[/COLOR][/U][/URL] stars to do parallax measurements. We do not use Type 1a supernova to measure the distances to [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable'][U][COLOR=rgb(0, 102, 204)]Cepheid variable[/COLOR][/U][/URL] stars or do parallax measurements. Thus "circular reasoning" is an obvious lie. This is a basic list - there are up to 26 "rungs": [URL='http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/distance.htm'][U]The ABC's of Distances[/U].[/URL] Edwin Hubble famously used [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable'][U][COLOR=rgb(0, 102, 204)]Cepheid variable[/COLOR][/U][/URL] stars to measure the distance to galaxies and measured their redshift. That gave the Hubble–Lemaître law. Add 80 years of measurements and there is an enormous body of evidence that this law is correct. Thus it is a convention in astronomy to write the distances to galaxies as redshifts using the symbol z. [URL='https://www.quora.com/How-is-it-possible-to-measure-astronomical-distances-using-the-Doppler-effect-when-the-speed-of-light-is-always-constant-regardless-of-the-source-and-the-observers-motion']How is it possible to measure astronomical distances using the Doppler effect when the speed of light is always constant, regardless of the source and the observers motion?[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Stars science say kicked out of galaxy actually coming in!
Top
Bottom