-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Star Trek: Into Darkness
- Thread starter WalksWithChrist
- Start date
The lens flaring does bother some people. But I like it.
It is "Into Darkness" and it is a dark movie. So be aware of that. If they saw they last one, I wouldn't worry about that too much. I think they'd be fine with it personally.
Upvote
0
SeekerOfChrist94
Grandma ♡ June 26, 1942 - January 10, 2017 5:32 pm
- Apr 21, 2013
- 7,653
- 2,079
- 31
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Just saw it with my family. Seriously awesome movie.
Only content you should worry about is you see a woman standing in her underwear for about a minute. Other than that, the content is clean.
Only content you should worry about is you see a woman standing in her underwear for about a minute. Other than that, the content is clean.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Prayer Circle
Well-Known Member
- Feb 4, 2012
- 894
- 89
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I'm waiting for the crowds to die down so I can go when there's a less crowded matinee opportunity. I don't like to watch a great movie in a sardine can environment.
Love the Star Trek franchise.
Love the Star Trek franchise.
Upvote
0
TheApostleJohn
Newbie
- Nov 28, 2010
- 759
- 452
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
B
BlueLioness
Guest
You're a little late, bro, I went to see it two weeks ago.
I agree with you it really is something. I thought the graphics were incredible.
Star Trek Into Darkness - International Trailer (HD) - YouTube
Upvote
0
As an original Trekkie I have to say I an disapointed.
The 3D just is not worth it to me- not enough scenes to warrant it plus the rim of the cheap glasses keep bringing me back into the theater.
I do not want some rehashing of old stories but background and complimentary info to fill in gaps. This director was not a trekkie/ trekker of his own and it shows that he only watched past series. Some how he missed the story of Pike.
Do not get me wrong--as a die hard trekkie ( even met "Scottie") I recommend the movie as it is a great distraction. I just do not like wondering why they did not fix things by the end of the movie ( other than the lead-ins for the next).
Would like more tech stuff put in too (such as background etc on it too.)
GO!
The 3D just is not worth it to me- not enough scenes to warrant it plus the rim of the cheap glasses keep bringing me back into the theater.
I do not want some rehashing of old stories but background and complimentary info to fill in gaps. This director was not a trekkie/ trekker of his own and it shows that he only watched past series. Some how he missed the story of Pike.
Do not get me wrong--as a die hard trekkie ( even met "Scottie") I recommend the movie as it is a great distraction. I just do not like wondering why they did not fix things by the end of the movie ( other than the lead-ins for the next).
Would like more tech stuff put in too (such as background etc on it too.)
GO!
Upvote
0
I was late with my first viewing, but I did see it twice!
I'm an old skool Trekkie too and I have my signed pic of Scottie. You have to keep in mind this is a complete reboot and has nothing to do with the previous shows. Once I got that thru my head after seeing the previous one, I was much happier. It's loosely based on the original.As an original Trekkie I have to say I an disapointed.
The 3D just is not worth it to me- not enough scenes to warrant it plus the rim of the cheap glasses keep bringing me back into the theater.
I do not want some rehashing of old stories but background and complimentary info to fill in gaps. This director was not a trekkie/ trekker of his own and it shows that he only watched past series. Some how he missed the story of Pike.
Do not get me wrong--as a die hard trekkie ( even met "Scottie") I recommend the movie as it is a great distraction. I just do not like wondering why they did not fix things by the end of the movie ( other than the lead-ins for the next).
Would like more tech stuff put in too (such as background etc on it too.)
GO!
Just see it as a great Trek-based action thrill ride with an amazing cast and you'll enjoy it much more. I sure do now.
Me too!
I reserve second viewings for the really great ones. This one sure qualified.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
