We should not buy into the media's politically-correct toadying notion of "radical Islam" or "radicalized Islamists" as if there is truly such a thing as a true Muslim who is not already radical, given what their book teaches.
I would ask,
What doesn't offend Muslims? The only truthful answer from a faithful Muslim is that
Muslims are offended by the existence of anyone who is not Muslim.
If you're not Muslim, you're an
infidel. First and foremost–it's not what you
say or
do, but what you
are, that's intolerable.
You could say nothing, or you could mouth all the right Islamic honorific titles in conversations with Muslims (empowering and emboldening) them), but even that is insufficient to placate Muslim sensibilities. For that matter, it's not even enough to
be Muslim. After all, it is offensive to be the wrong kind of Muslim.
Sunnis are offensive to
Shiites, and vice versa.
Many Muslims still believe the Christian Trinity is “Father, Son, and Mother”. (
Surah 5:116) Sigh. This caricature of the Trinitarian doctrine in the Muslim's holy book is alone sufficient evidence that the book of Islam is not divinely inspired. For if it were, the book would at least get the doctrine of the Trinity as taught in the Bible and believed by Christians correct. The fact that it does not is
prima facie evidence of the questionable origins of the book.
This fact is more pointed given that the book of Islam arrived on the scene in the
seventh century, hundreds of years after the church had declared the doctrine of the Trinity at Chalcedon in answer to the numerous heresies that were prevalent at the time. Was God ignorant of what the Christian church was declaring about
His one divine essence and three personal subsistences (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) when His angel, Gabriel, presumably revealed God to Muhammad a cave in the seventh century? You would think that this presumed "corrective" from God through Gabriel to Muhammad would at least have its facts straight about the Christianity being denounced therein.
In the final analysis all the lachrymose pontifications by Muslims that Islam is a
religion of peace ignores the reality of their own book.
That which is contained in the book of Islam is clearly denied by Muslims who profess their
peaceful religion. Shirk! Indeed, they are hypocrites of the first order of their own
professed (but apparently not
possessed) faith.
Any Muslim who gives their careful attention to the violence now part of the
Sharia, Muhammad’s
Sunna (e.g., 4:24, 4:92, 8:69, 24:33, 33:21, 33:50), and the sword and anti-Christian verses of the Qur’an (e.g., 4:74, 4:91, 8:12, 9:5, 9:29, 33:35-36, 59:2) should realize that the so-called "typical" Muslim's claims of "Islam is a religion of peace" are but chimeras of their own making.
Muslims are quick to point to the violence recorded in the Christian bible and claim that Christianity’s early history was violent, too. But unlike the Bible where some very awful
history is recorded, the violence described in the Qur’an is part of Islamic
theology. This is a very significant distinction between the two belief systems.
The famous Muslim scholar and “father of modern history” Ibn Khaldun (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Khaldun) states the dichotomy between jihad and defensive warfare thus:
In the Muslim community, the holy war [i.e. jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force...The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense...They are merely required to establish their religion among their own people. That is why the Israelites after Moses and Joshua remained unconcerned with royal authority [e.g. a “caliphate”]. Their only concern was to establish their religion [not spread it to the nations]…But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations (The Muqudimmah, vol. 1 pg. 473).
If a Muslim are going to stand for something he or she should at least stand for what their book actually teaches rather than claiming "Islam does not teach this or that" when it clearly does.
AMR