• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

St. Paul Demonstrating Sola Scriptura In Scripture

Status
Not open for further replies.

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,800
1,310
✟478,340.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Where is it stated that the apostles wrote down everything necessary for salvation?

I'm just making the case that the Bereans can't be used as a poster child for sola-scriptura. They accepted Paul's oral testimony to the person of Jesus Christ outside of the bounds of their Scripture.

That's all.
 
Upvote 0

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,800
1,310
✟478,340.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I stand corrected, thank you.

Nevertheless, Paul had testimony that they all received the Holy Spirit, what need is there to add further burden on them.

A memo James, even though an apostle, evidently did not get.

You're welcome.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Scriptural evidence that the Bereans came to their own conclusion that circumcision was not necessary?

In Acts 15, it was a sect of Pharisees who believed from Jerusalem, not Berea, who thought circumcision was necessary. Paul, Peter, Barnabas, the elders, apostles all gathered. James pulled out the OT and said it is written, agreeing.

It's interesting that the Pharisees didn't actually present any tradition for their view. IOW, no gentile was ever required to be circumcised. They (some of them because Paul, Peter, etc knew it) just had to understand it wasn't necessary for salvation for them either.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Where is it stated that the apostles wrote down everything necessary for salvation?

John-these things were written that you might believe, and hence have life.

Jude-contend for the faith.

Paul-teach the same.

There's others.

I'm just making the case that the Bereans can't be used as a poster child for sola-scriptura. They accepted Paul's oral testimony to the person of Jesus Christ outside of the bounds of their Scripture.

That's all.

We all agree the apostles spoke and then wrote it down.

Apostles spoke. The Bereans checked scripture to see if it is true.

A bishop speaks. We check the scripture to see if it is true.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
There's a falsehood here 'if a bishop speaks we check scripture'

Firslty however it's illogical because the church existed between the Apostles deaths and the formation of the bible - knowing what is scripture is relevant.

Secondly, the falsehood is demonstrated by people arguing against Mary being Ever-Virgin -which is not 'untrue' by scripture.
 
Upvote 0
P

Publius

Guest
There's a falsehood here 'if a bishop speaks we check scripture'

Firslty however it's illogical because the church existed between the Apostles deaths and the formation of the bible

Not when you stop to consider that the OT scriptures and many of the NT epistiles were already in circulation long before the Bible was compiled.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Not when you stop to consider that the OT scriptures and many of the NT epistiles were already in circulation long before the Bible was compiled.

That is missing the point.

Go back to being a Christian in the year 200. The Aposles are dead.

There is no bible

Someone gives you an Epistle to read.

How do you know it's genuine?
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
From what I can tell (you can correct me if I'm wrong), you are asserting that the OT Scriptures that the Bereans had were sufficient to find salvation in Jesus Christ independent of the testimony of Paul to the person of Jesus. True or not?

No, that doesn't even make sense. Somehow they had to hear news of the Nazarene. From there, yes OT carries the day. What made the Bereans more noble was that they searched the Scriptures, to see whether the claims being made were relevant.

They found that they were.

This is what California Josiah went to great lengths to spell out as norma normans, or some such. (As long as it wasn't Cliff Clayburn)
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Sola-scriptura professes that the Scriptures are sufficient -- contain all that is necessary to know of salvation. Nothing additional is needed.

Nope. Not at all. I might as well go back to thinking Catholics pray to Mary ...
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Nope. It moves them squarely into the realm of believers.

There is no reason to conflate the simplicity of the Gospel, with all that the city-state of Rome asserts.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
No, that doesn't even make sense. Somehow they had to hear news of the Nazarene. From there, yes OT carries the day. What made the Bereans more noble was that they searched the Scriptures, to see whether the claims being made were relevant.
No.

Only because Paul didn't teach AGAINST scripture. However scripture itself wasn't enough to convince the Bereans, but Paul's message with scripture together (tradition and bible) worked.


This is what California Josiah went to great lengths to spell out as norma normans, or some such. (As long as it wasn't Cliff Clayburn)

That's already been undermined by people arguing against traditions that aren't against scripture!
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Was this before or after Peter yielded to the strength of Paul's position?
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Did the Bereans understand from OT scripture that circumcision was no longer valid?

If I might refine SUP's answer a tad, I would say that what's recorded in Scripture shows that it's most likely that some people got this point while others didn't.
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Not when you stop to consider that the OT scriptures and many of the NT epistiles were already in circulation long before the Bible was compiled.

ALL the books of the Bible were in use before the Bible was ever compiled! Not sure why this significant point gets glossed over
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
If I might refine SUP's answer a tad, I would say that what's recorded in Scripture shows that it's most likely that some people got this point while others didn't.

If you could refine it so as to look at the question one might know that in Acts 15 some of the believers thought that despite the OT saying one must circumcise that we were no longer bound by that.

There's not OT text that they are shown to consult that say that circumcision is to end - only that it's valid to get gentile converts.

Without referring to scripture they then came to a decision, gave that decision as was good to them and published it (without reference to OT scripture).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.