- Dec 1, 2019
- 4,887
- 2,313
- 65
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Is it true that Pope JP II knew about the sexual abuse cases and covered it up? If so, how did he get to be a Saint?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ThanksThis explains it from a Catholic perspective:
![]()
He Knew of Priestly Sexual Abuse and Yet Now He's a Saint
First of all, we don’t know when John Paul II became fully aware of the extent of the problem of priests committing sexual abuse. Keep in mind that it is...www.catholic.com
Here is my understanding. The Polish Communists used to claim priests were involved in sexual abuse. For the most part it was probably an empty claim to discredit priests. As bishop and archbishop in Poland I suspect he heard many such attempts to discredit priests and he dismissed them. He was most likely accurate in dismissing the Polish Communist claims. He was also under the opinion that no priest would ever do such a thing, that it just wasn't possible. I think what then happened while he was pope was to dismiss such claims, again, as impossible and as attempts by nasty people to discredit good priests. I don't think for a moment he covered for priests he knew or thought were guilty. He is appropriately a saint, but maybe a too gullible one.Is it true that Pope JP II knew about the sexual abuse cases and covered it up? If so, how did he get to be a Saint?
I do believe Pope Benedict was a saintly man and will one day be canonized, but it might be a few decades yet. IIRC, he defrocked over 400+ priests who were guilty of sexual abuse.Here is my understanding. The Polish Communists used to claim priests were involved in sexual abuse. For the most part it was probably an empty claim to discredit priests. As bishop and archbishop in Poland I suspect he heard many such attempts to discredit priests and he dismissed them. He was most likely accurate in dismissing the Polish Communist claims. He was also under the opinion that no priest would ever do such a thing, that it just wasn't possible. I think what then happened while he was pope was to dismiss such claims, again, as impossible and as attempts by nasty people to discredit good priests. I don't think for a moment he covered for priests he knew or thought were guilty. He is appropriately a saint, but maybe a too gullible one.
Pope Benedict knew more of what was actually going on. He called it 'filth' and he tried to deal with it. It was too much for him and he retired defeated. Pope Francis was supposed to clean it up but that hasn't happened. Rupnik is still influential, McCarrick was rehabilitated before finally being demoted, and some South Americans who should have been sent to monasteries in Antarctica are still active. Pope John Paul II was a saint. Pope Benedict was a brilliant man defeated by the filth. I wish I thought he could be a saint and a doctor of the Church but probably not. Pope Francis seems to have done so little. On can hope his successor has the strength and the willingness to really clean house.
Fr Maciel was a pervert indeed! Yikes!It is my understanding that while Pope John Paul was sick, Cardinal Sodano kept Pope John Paul II in the dark about sexual abuses.
Specifically, Father Marcial Maciel, of the Legions of Christ, whom priest wrote to the Vatican about sexual abuses by Fr Marciel.
However, they never got answered. It is believed that Cardinal Sodano got the letters but never forwarded them nor spoke to
Pope John Paul II about them. Its speculated that it was because Fr Marciel had given the Vatican $250,000 dollars per year
and Cardinal Sodano didn't want to interrupt that.
There are other issues with Cardinal Sodano, but I won't get into them here.
He kept Pope John Paul II in the dark as he was sick and dying.Fr Maciel was a pervert indeed! Yikes
There was SO MUCH that was good about him. In the end though he resigned and we ended up with pope Francis. I don't know how history will evaluate that.I do believe Pope Benedict was a saintly man and will one day be canonized, but it might be a few decades yet. IIRC, he defrocked over 400+ priests who were guilty of sexual abuse.
I think the lavender mafia forced him to resign, but that might be considered a conspiracy theoryThere was SO MUCH that was good about him. In the end though he resigned and we ended up with pope Francis. I don't know how history will evaluate that.
I think something similar. It was the Lavender Mafia that made him feel powerless to resist them. I suspect he thought a younger and stronger pope could resist it all better. But then we got pope Francis.I think the lavender mafia forced him to resign, but that might be considered a conspiracy theory
It’s all in God’s hands. Praying for a new leader that will help clean up the mess after Pope Francis eventually passes.I think something similar. It was the Lavender Mafia that made him feel powerless to resist them. I suspect he thought a younger and stronger pope could resist it all better. But then we got pope Francis.
Or maybe God shows his glory while the Church is all but defeated. I donno. It is in God's hands. It's like pope John XXIII said, "Lord, it's your Chruch. I'm going to bed."It’s all in God’s hands. Praying for a new leader that will help clean up the mess after Pope Francis eventually passes.
Amen. My daily prayer as well!Or maybe God shows his glory while the Church is all but defeated. I donno. It is in God's hands. It's like pope John XXIII said, "Lord, it's your Chruch. I'm going to bed."