• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Ah, no...

Your statement was illogical. it was a false dichotomy... unity in doctrine or unity in Christ.

Our unity isn't in doctrines but in Christ

But you're right, it happens when we post and we get caught up. We don't give ourselves enough time to think through what we are saying.

If you want to qualify it, that's fine. I'm not going to hold you to it if you really don't believe that.
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Bene, I think you quoted someone else along with me.

I've been busy, but not out of town. I am planning on a week off in November to go hunting/camping. I live in Montana...our fires are out, thank God. I have family in SoCal and things are a bit hairy.
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I suppose we should define what are essential doctrines and what are not? Would that help? As a blanket statement, I stand by what I said, even if you misunderstand what I mean.


Or should we quit hijacking this poor thread. LOL
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I suppose we should define what are essential doctrines and what are not? Would that help? As a blanket statement, I stand by what I said, even if you misunderstand what I mean.


Or should we quit hijacking this poor thread. LOL
all doctrine is essential... least God would not have bothered to reveal it us.

This notion that we are united in the essentials and the rest is lagniappe (french word for a little something extra) is erroneous... it's one of those teachings of men that was handed down from the Baptist church.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I did, I fixed it. I was asking Reformationist if he was by those fires.
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
LOL So you think sprinkled vs dunked is an essential point of contention?


I don't. I think there are non-essentials, such as my above example, that don't impact a persons salvation and don't cast doubt on whether or not they are following God, as opposed to a god.
 
Upvote 0

lionroar0

Coffee drinker
Jul 10, 2004
9,362
705
54
✟35,401.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
LOL So you think sprinkled vs dunked is an essential point of contention?

We have no problem with either. That's actually another christian tradition contention against the CC

The difference in the essential would be baptism is a sacrament or symbolic?


Peace
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
So because I beleive it is symbolic, because the Bible does not tell us it is necessary to be saved (but it is an act of obedience and should be done) then you don't count me as a brother? I am in rebelion/schism/heresy?
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
sacraments are symbolic.
Why are symbols so de-valued over this?
The priesthood is festooned with symbols, but they are sneered at come sacrament time.
I think I know why.
Main Entry: sac·ra·ment1 a: a Christian rite (as baptism or the Eucharist) that is believed to have been ordained by Christ and that is held to be a means of divine grace or to be a sign or symbol of a spiritual reality b: a religious rite or observance comparable to a Christian sacrament.
Why can't symbols be a "means of grace"?
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private

"LOL," Mont, when are you ever going to stop with thinking you have 'the' correct interpretation of scripture?

Please tell me, how on earth you can think you have this all figured out because you have a bible in your hands?

Take a look into the early Church for the first 1530 years... NO ONE ever interpreted scripture in the way you guys have been in the last 500. Why is that, Mont?

Baptism... even Luther and Calvin believed it to be NECESSARY and a sacrament (an outward sign that imparts grace) and that it wasn't just some little symbolic thing. No Christan ever thought that until maybe a few hundred years ago.

This is a prime, perfect example of how Protest-ism keeps evolving and evolving, protesting even their predecessors.

Your "doctrine" Mont is not as original or as "non denominational," lone ranger as you think it is. You follow a traditional Baptist POV. Your views are radical Anabaptist.

You don't believe me? Look into it, you'll see, if your honest enough to see.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
So because I beleive it is symbolic, because the Bible does not tell us it is necessary to be saved (but it is an act of obedience and should be done) then you don't count me as a brother? I am in rebelion/schism/heresy?
We count you as brother because of your baptism regardless if you think it is symbolic or not. What you think does not effect the realty of what baptism is, a holy mystery that incorporates us into the death and resurrection of Christ.

And the bible indeed tells us baptism saves, it is just obtuse to keep denying it does.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
LOL, thanks for continually ducking my questions.
What question?

is sprinkling vrs immersion essential? It's bogus question Mont, how can i answer it?

If what you are trying to ask is if water baptism is one of the essential doctrines we must accept, Darn right it is.
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Take a look into the early Church for the first 1530 years... NO ONE ever interpreted scripture in the way you guys have been in the last 500. Why is that, Mont?
That's establishment christendom's (as opposed to chrtistianity's)private interpretation of the EVERY ONE in the first 1530 years.
That's why we call it "REFORMED".
That's why it required PROTEST.
Your speech is riddled with self contradiction:
Baptism... even Luther and Calvin believed it to be NECESSARY and a sacrament (an outward sign that imparts grace) and that it wasn't just some little symbolic thing. No Christan ever thought that until maybe a few hundred years ago.

An "outward sign" IS a symbol!

All this double-talk serves to justify an illigitimate Levitical model priesthood that Jesus replaced.

sacraments are symbolic.
Why are symbols so de-valued over this?
The priesthood is festooned with symbols, but they are sneered at come sacrament time.
I think I know why.
Main Entry: sac·ra·ment1 a: a Christian rite (as baptism or the Eucharist) that is believed to have been ordained by Christ and that is held to be a means of divine grace or to be a sign or symbol of a spiritual reality b: a religious rite or observance comparable to a Christian sacrament.
Why can't symbols be a "means of grace"?
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Let's test your ability to be open to factual historical Christianity.

You see this guy? He learned from the apostles... how can he be wrong and 16-1700 years later some racial new Anabaptist tradition be right?

 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Bapstism saves?

Baptism of the Spirit, yes...water baptism, no.



You continue to duck my question regarding the passages I posted about who the saints are ( a bit more back on topic with the OP) and how they disprove the RCC ideal of saints vs Saints.


As for our side discussion, you missed my point and did not address the diference beteween essential and non-essential doctrines. However, since you did admit you see me as a brother, you have (in practice) proven my point, that our overall unity is not in doctrines but in Christ (in His work in us and who we are in Him).
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Let's test your ability to be open to factual historical Christianity.

You see this guy? He learned from the apostles... how can he be wrong and 16-1700 years later some racial new Anabaptist tradition be right?
He can be wrong because he was just another person. The Bible clearly says that we believe first and get baptised (water) second. We are saved first.


Praise God that He sent brave men to question tradition and to study and show the masses the truths in Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your ability to self-servingly interpret facts needs no testing.
All of Isreal was ignorantly wrong about God & salvation for hundreds of years.
Even Peter was taught by Jesus and he still made serious errors.
Your obsession with an "error free" notion of the ecclesia is vanity.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Say what?? Again, you know not what you say...

So u are claiming that these radical Anabaptist reformers who reformed the original reformers were infallible and God sent?

On what exactly do you based that?

Because you prefer their interpretation of scripture over Justin Maryter... who, A) wasn't interpreting scripture Mont, but who learned from the apostles themselves and B) who died for the faith that he learned from those who learned from Christ...

Like I said, in all honesty Mont, who really is more credible? The radical Anabaptist with a bible 16-1700 years after the fact, or the martyrs of our faith who shed their own blood to preserve the faith so it could be handed down to you, 70 years after Christ went up?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.