- Feb 1, 2002
- 30,243
- 642
- 49
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Single
Okay, I know I could probably go search all this information up, but I figured maybe someone would know some of this off the top of their heads and be able to answer some questions for me.
I just finished reading parts of his Confessions for class and was wondering some things...
1.) Why was he made a saint? Was it because of what he did once he became a Catholic or was it because he was an archbishop or was it something else?
2.) I might've missed some important parts (because what I have is just selections from some of the books)...but the way I read it, he became a Catholic by being baptized. I know that's not the case now. Was that how he became a Catholic?
3.) Along with the above, when was it that there was more involved in becoming a Catholic for someone who had not been what we've been calling a cradle Catholic?
4.) When considering individuals for positions (like bishops, etc.), do they look at the person's past? I mean, when we're voting in a president, one side does what they can to dig up dirt on the other side (drug abuse, arrests, on and on). Is that the same sort of thing for high positions in the Church?
5.) Along with the above, if Augustine was a person today and had done everything he did before, do you think he still would've wound up being an archbishop and then later canonized?
I think that's all I have for now.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
1.) Why was he made a saint? Was it because of what he did once he became a Catholic or was it because he was an archbishop or was it something else?
2.) I might've missed some important parts (because what I have is just selections from some of the books)...but the way I read it, he became a Catholic by being baptized. I know that's not the case now. Was that how he became a Catholic?
3.) Along with the above, when was it that there was more involved in becoming a Catholic for someone who had not been what we've been calling a cradle Catholic?
4.) When considering individuals for positions (like bishops, etc.), do they look at the person's past? I mean, when we're voting in a president, one side does what they can to dig up dirt on the other side (drug abuse, arrests, on and on). Is that the same sort of thing for high positions in the Church?
5.) Along with the above, if Augustine was a person today and had done everything he did before, do you think he still would've wound up being an archbishop and then later canonized?
I think that's all I have for now.