Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Biden Administration's fudged numbers. is by far the second biggest fudge in US history. Guess the number 1 fudge.
Democrats have been in power for 12 of the past 16 years, and all that they have to excuse their gross failure is to blame Trump.
It's laughable.
Well, thank you for a pleasant journey through your “fudge-list”, then.Trends Journal
I can't post Gerald Celente's report here. He gets rather colorful in his presentations
How is it not a recession when we gain 2 million jobs instead of 3 million? That’s his question? lolI pulled this off of Zachary Bauer's Youtube channel; but unfortunately he mentioned a Zerohedge article that gets a wee bit on the colorful side too
View attachment 353813
You might try to google "net jobs created by year or by president" since Reagan
The great thing about Trends Journal is that they actually predicted the .com bust before it happened, and Gerald puts that information together with other information to make predictions regarding new trends.Well, thank you for a pleasant journey through your “fudge-list”, then.
Those auto workers don't need those high paying union jobs. They should get a job like mopping floors, or working as low paid healthcare workers. That is where the jobs are being created.How is it not a recession when we gain 2 million jobs instead of 3 million? That’s his question? lol
I don’t suppose you have data to support that claim?Those auto workers don't need those high paying union jobs. They should get a job like mopping floors, or working as low paid healthcare workers. That is where the jobs are being created.
I don’t suppose you have data to support that claim?
Two of the three that lost jobs are not traditionally “union jobs.”View attachment 353814
Indeed, job growth is concentrated in industries that are historically low-paying — and continue to pay less than the average across private industries.
It's getting really hard to find a job that pays well
Job growth is booming in low-paying, traditionally female industries, but high-paying roles might be harder to find.www.businessinsider.com
I knew that. I just threw that in there because of all of the recent layoffs, and pending layoffs, of auto industry as Americans struggle to purchase reliable transportation (let alone auto insurance) in this economy.Two of the three that lost jobs are not traditionally “union jobs.”
Your chart doesn’t say that. It only says “health services,” which is an industry that has a lot of very well paying jobs in addition to the low paying ones.I knew that. I just threw that in there because of all of the recent layoffs, and pending layoffs, of auto industry as Americans struggle to purchase reliable transportation (let alone auto insurance) in this economy.
However you should have also noticed that all three are high paying, compared to the wages of those who scrub disease laden hospital rooms after the patients are removed.
You could continue reading the post. Try looking at what is written in the box, just below the actual link. This isn't an isolated report. The information is all over the web.Your chart doesn’t say that. It only says “health services,” which is an industry that has a lot of very well paying jobs in addition to the low paying ones.
The BI article is behind a paywall. To what report is it referring?You could continue reading the post. Try looking at what is written in the box, just below the actual link. This isn't an isolated report. The information is all over the web.
Maybe this will help:The BI article is behind a paywall. To what report is it referring?
It's getting really hard to find a job that pays well
Job growth is booming in low-paying, traditionally female industries, but high-paying roles might be harder to find.www.businessinsider.com
Higher paying jobs are always harder to find.Maybe this will help:
Job growth is booming in low-paying, traditionally female industries, but high-paying roles might be harder to find.
You might want to brush up on the basics of Capitalism. Value is driven, whether of labor, or of any other market commodity, by supply and demand.Higher paying jobs are always harder to find.
This is the nature of Capitlaism.
2nd quarter GDP rose 2.9%, how is this a “slumping economy”?You might want to brush up on the basics of Capitalism. Value is driven, whether of labor, or of any other market commodity, by supply and demand.
Higher paying jobs are usually awarded to those who have advanced skills. That changes when the the market for advances skills is saturated.
With Biden's slumping economy, the demand for skilled labor is down.
Lower paying jobs are sometimes difficult to find. I had a friend who had degrees from two Ivy League colleges. He liked to make just enough money to save up enough to fly to Asia, spend a year there living like a king (by their standards), and fly back to get another minimum wage job. Then he would repeat the cycle.
He had a hard enough time finding even those low paying jobs, because he was overqualified; and based on his work history, his prospective employers suspected that he wouldn't stay with them long term.
I try to avoid using absolute terms like "always."
I dunno man, the GOP had been hammering Mr Biden’s mental acuity for months.The Liberal media started questioning Biden's mental capacity just in time.
I think is this is all just sour grapes on the part of the GOP.What seems nefarious is hiding it and perpetuating the lie that Biden was sharp as a tack and at the top of his game until the debate exposed him and they couldn't hide it anymore
Yeah, sucks to be the side that was screaming for Mr Biden to go for Mr Biden to go.His legacy will be of a cognitively impaired man whose condition was lied about and kept from the public until it looked like he would lose to Trump.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?