Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Speculation on Early life…. What do you think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mountainmike" data-source="post: 77161487" data-attributes="member: 392252"><p>I apologise , that phrase was too harsh, but I think the thread has run it’s course anyway.</p><p></p><p>Its quite remarkable that so little has changed in so long.</p><p>if I’d written this 25 years ago, I would have got the same responses.</p><p></p><p>miller Urey…abundance of prebiotic soup… any new life is gobbled up , outcompeted by present, and a picture of horse or dinosaur tree “ proving” evolution from Abiogenesis as source of life.</p><p></p><p>But in all that time nobody has proposed an early cell structure with prospective pathway to/ from It , or a simple genome structure. The abundant “ prebiotic soup argument” is a fail, until you define A pathway so what ingredients were needed. Nobody has a good enough reason why other life origins don’t occur. There is a lot of speculation in the life tree. So little has changed, in all that tIme</p><p></p><p>Dont get me wrong, I might believe it if ever a structure and pathway looks credible .</p><p>The problem is it is all now promoted as a fact it happened with none of the detail Needed to argue that case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mountainmike, post: 77161487, member: 392252"] I apologise , that phrase was too harsh, but I think the thread has run it’s course anyway. Its quite remarkable that so little has changed in so long. if I’d written this 25 years ago, I would have got the same responses. miller Urey…abundance of prebiotic soup… any new life is gobbled up , outcompeted by present, and a picture of horse or dinosaur tree “ proving” evolution from Abiogenesis as source of life. But in all that time nobody has proposed an early cell structure with prospective pathway to/ from It , or a simple genome structure. The abundant “ prebiotic soup argument” is a fail, until you define A pathway so what ingredients were needed. Nobody has a good enough reason why other life origins don’t occur. There is a lot of speculation in the life tree. So little has changed, in all that tIme Dont get me wrong, I might believe it if ever a structure and pathway looks credible . The problem is it is all now promoted as a fact it happened with none of the detail Needed to argue that case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Speculation on Early life…. What do you think?
Top
Bottom