Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Am I reading that correctly? You bandpass at 3 and 6 Hz?We bandpass filter our data 3-6-60-90Hz.
So the chances are we lose this noise.
I can't access the paper to find out what frequencies we are talking about here but the abstract says low frequency.
You don't just "speed up" the moving of continents. Sorry.How to move a continent well just speed up and hit the brakes.
Modern scenery explained.
It's completely unsupported by anything. There is no evidence for your claim.The deepened seas is a good idea for where the water went to. The seas before the flood were shallow relatively.
Its reasonable from biblical foundation and evidence in the field.
This thread was about where did all the water go after the flood.
Ew creationists gave good answers of where it went.
Then you guys change the subject.
For me you talked about continents moving being impossible.
Then you say the bible is not a legitamate witness
and then you say geologists know the truth.
I know the bible is a witness but I don't rely on it to make the creationist case.
We use the data.
Saying you are the experts is just a way to avoid criticism of your ideas.
From my readings in geology every geology graduation class overthrows the previous ideas in geology.
It is not scientific but speculative.
The separation of the continents is one of the best things to come along in geology for the gain of creationism.
It is the source for the great movement of sediment and volcanic chaos that is found in the data of rocks in the field.
The continents did move and this fits fine and is welcomed by creationism.
How to move a continent well just speed up and hit the brakes.
Modern scenery explained.
The deepened seas is a good idea for where the water went to.
The seas before the flood were shallow relatively.
Its reasonable from biblical foundation and evidence in the field.
You are not showing their was too much water.
Am I reading that correctly? You bandpass at 3 and 6 Hz?
Wow...I can't even reproduce frequencies below 40 Hz!
We record all frequencies but we have an analogue filter built into our recording apparatus that is full off at 3Hz and fully open at 6Hz, we also have a digital filter in teh recording computer software set to the same levels. We record to a Nyquist frequency of 125 Hz, but in processing our upper filter is fully open at 60Hz and fully off at 90Hz. So we are generally working of frequencies between 6-60Hz.
Yeah, you'd have to be at around 120 to sample up to 60...
That's crazy....what kind of element are you using? Would I be correct in speculating that it's enormous (as far as elements go, anyway)?
Most hydrocarbon source rocks would have very low permiability as they are organic shales.
In that case it is quite possible that a reservoir cap rock has a higher permiability than the source rock as they would both be fairly impermiable.
So, you may tell me that how could the trap accumulate anything if it leaks faster than it gets?
Do you want to talk specifics because you question really makes no sense in the general form above.
Once again it looks as if you have trawled through a basic geological text without really understanding it.
Try again.
You can save this crap from now on as no one would pay attention to it.
It is unknown and is a variable. You do not correct anything until you know what to correct.Baggins,
Have you ever been asked to correct your 3D seismics for oceanic hum?
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/307/5710/682?ck=nck
I never have, but it is quite variable given atmospheric conditions.
Just wondered....
Can you read the small print on the scale of the attenuation profile? Could you explain the unit for me? It read something like "din(I/Q)%". What is that?My reply is directly below the post.
You and TexasSky appear to view this mantle water as a great big body of H2O like an underground lake.
That isn't what it is like, read the article TexasSky linked to, but apparantly didn't read.
If you do not use your brain in this forum, you are not using it anywhere.
Thanks, brother. God gives me a strong sense of logic. And like my son usually tells me, my problem is the lack of love (he likes to say that I "kill to dissect"). I loose my control easily when I see repetitive stupidity. Thanks for the reminder.Hey, bro, don't forget our Prime Directive ---
[bible]Matthew 28:18-20[/bible]
Most hydrocarbon source rocks would have very low permiability as they are organic shales.
In that case it is quite possible that a reservoir cap rock has a higher permiability than the source rock as they would both be fairly impermiable.
If we could squeak a little geology in here, could you explain how this works? Is it that the hydrocarbons are trapped in the source rock by dint of its impermeability, with the "cap" rock really serving to contain them at all?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reservoirA prospect is a potential trap which geologists believe may contain hydrocarbons. A significant amount of geological, structural and seismic investigation must first be completed to redefine the potential hydrocarbon drill location from a lead to a prospect. Five elements have to be present for a prospect to work and if any of them fail neither oil nor gas will be present.
- A source rock - When organic-rich rock such as oil shale or coal is subjected to high pressure and temperature over an extended period of time, hydrocarbons form.
- Migration - The Hydrocarbons are expelled from source rock by three density-related mechanisms: the newly-matured hydrocarbons are less dense than their precursors, which causes overpressure; the hydrocarbons are lighter medium, and so migrate upwards due to buoyancy, and the fluids expand as further burial causes increased heating. Most hydrocarbons migrate to the surface as oil seeps, but some will get trapped.
- Trap - The hydrocarbons are buoyant and have to be trapped within a structural (e.g. Anticline, fault block) or stratigraphic trap
- Seal or cap Rock - The hydrocarbon trap has to be covered by an impermeable rock known as a seal or cap-rock in order to prevent hydrocarbons escaping to the surface
- Reservoir - The hydrocarbons are contained in a reservoir rock. This is a porous sandstone or limestone. The oil collects in the pores within the rock. The reservoir must also be permeable so that the hydrocarbons will flow to surface during production.
So, you may tell me that how could the trap accumulate anything if it leaks faster than it gets?
You can save this crap from now on as no one would pay attention to it.
And still you provide no evidence for your assertions.It is unknown and is a variable. You do not correct anything until you know what to correct.
If you do not use your brain in this forum, you are not using it anywhere.
I used my geology knowledge to propose a possible cause of global flood. You do not take it. That is fine. But why are you here? Is "I don't believe you" or "the model is ridiculous" the best thing you can say to a Creation hypothesis? Are you here to give challenge to Creationist with your best knowledge? If so, where is your challenge?
Since you are not good in petrology, sedimentology. It is pretty flavorless by seeing you challenge me with naive questions.
I like to see that you are able to give a blow based on your best knowledge. So, throw to me your low T organic geochemistry argument as a challenge against Creationism. I am going to your field to see what is your qualification to challenge the science in the Bible.
If you do not have any challenge to give, then wait for a while, I will throw one low T geochemistry stone to you.
It is not my field. But at least I think I might be able to give you some hard time in your field of knowledge.
So, if you can make a good shot, I am ready. Otherwise, you just wait. But, it would also mean that you already lose the first round.
Apparently [[sup]14[/sup]C in coal] correlates best with the content of the natural radioactivity of the rocks surrounding the fossil fuels, particularly the neutron- and alpha-particle-emitting isotopes of the uranium-thorium series.(SOURCE)
Am I reading that correctly? You bandpass at 3 and 6 Hz?
Wow...I can't even reproduce frequencies below 40 Hz!
Am I reading that correctly? You bandpass at 3 and 6 Hz?
Wow...I can't even reproduce frequencies below 40 Hz!
Was I wrong that the frequency of ocean hum depends on locality and time?And still you provide no evidence for your assertions.
But I think I know why.
You are incapable. You hand waive and dance around subjects spitting forth assertions and denigrating your debating opponents and when it comes down to it, you can't provide any evidence for anything you say. At this point you degrade into insults, flaming and baiting.
So, you may tell me that how could the trap accumulate anything if it leaks faster than it gets?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?