Please do not read.
Creationist offers up bad arguments, ignores evidence, and then complains when those arguments are critiqued. That is what ends all of these discussions.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have done mine. It is hard to continue the discussion with people at different levels. They asked you a few intuitive questions. You gave some analysis. They do not quite understand, do not appreciate but said you are wrong. That is enough to end any discussion. I am amazed that how difficult it could be in order to have a positive attitude of debating.
Please do not respond. I am not talking to anyone, but to myself.
But what you say is simply and irrevocably wrong. So saying it again and again and again doesn't make it any less wrong, it just means you're wrong again and again and again. Every single thing you say is based upon one unevidenced and unprovable hypothesis... that the Bible is true regardless of the evidence against it. Starting from that position is nice and all... but it's just not sane. We're not afraid of things that go bump in the night anymore. For some reason you are. I can't fathom the fear that drives you to this place. Yet, every day I'm grateful that I'm not so afraid of dying that I'm driven to irrationality. Two days... two years or two hours. Any time span is too long.I feel your pain, Juvenissun --- I really do. Wait until you've been at this almost two years. Saying the same things over and over and over again.
I feel your pain, Juvenissun --- I really do. Wait until you've been at this almost two years. Saying the same things over and over and over again.
In fact, I am not painful at all. I just feel disappointed with those called themselves scientists. They are not scientists. When they can reason, they do. When their reasoning hit wall, they became stupid. That is a typical behavior of a coward. They don't even know how to learn.I feel your pain, Juvenissun --- I really do. Wait until you've been at this almost two years. Saying the same things over and over and over again.
I can't say I'm surprised, but it is disappointing.
Juvenissun started out strongly by actually using somewhat uncommon geologic terms like lherzolite,
We are waiting on your evidence to support your assertion.Yes. The beauty of geological science as we know it now is that we can see some scientific reasons that could support or explain the Genesis Flood.
OK, it is my turn now. You do not know what lherzolite is, I guess you failed the petrology class in your undergraduate study.
What do you know? How do you challenge the Christian faith with what you know? Let's me see something you are proud of, which makes you an atheist. How would anything in low T organic geochemistry disprove the Bible?
You better not say anything. If you do, I will certainly push you to the wall.
In fact, I am not painful at all. I just feel disappointed with those called themselves scientists. They are not scientists. When they can reason, they do. When their reasoning hit wall, they became stupid. That is a typical behavior of a coward. They don't even know how to learn.
There are 98 posts here, but none of them can answer your question. Sorry for the late. But I am answering it now. It is quite disappointed that all the evolution people in this forum do not know much about science.
It is complicate. It would take me a while if I choose to answer them, and frankly, no one knows the details for sure so far.
Well, I am not sure if I am on the same page with you geologists. But it does not matter. Do not expect me to know the details on the mechanism of the global flood.
If you are asking me what is the process that could accumulate free water in the mantle condition, I am telling you loudly that I do not know. However, if we replace the word "water" with "volatile compounds", then many geologists can say something about it, even all we know are still only hypotheses or models. The volatiles include water, CO2, other gases and at least the alkaline elements if we do not consider the Ca and LREE.
I am afraid people here could not take the concise explanation. For example, it seems why are alkaline elements treated as volatiles in the mantle is still a question.
How about the tropical wooly mammoth got frozen alive in the arctics? This is a simple one.
Please try to challenge me with better questions, so a human being could possibly answer something. It is meaningless and useless to ask a science question which none of the TE or atheist on the earth have any clue about.
In fact, I am not painful at all. I just feel disappointed with those called themselves scientists. They are not scientists. When they can reason, they do. When their reasoning hit wall, they became stupid. That is a typical behavior of a coward. They don't even know how to learn.
OK, it is my turn now. You do not know what lherzolite is, I guess you failed the petrology class in your undergraduate study.
What do you know? How do you challenge the Christian faith with what you know? Let's me see something you are proud of, which makes you an atheist. How would anything in low T organic geochemistry disprove the Bible?
You better not say anything. If you do, I will certainly push you to the wall.
If you talk about science, then you should not worry any thing about "feeling". There are only true, false, or unknown. If you abided to logical argument, nobody would be hurt and there would be nothing to regret about.I am sorry that were unable to deal with the details of your own hypothesis.
Baggins, you call yourself a geologist. I can not see it. What do you know the best in geology? Care to take a challenge?And finally the add hominem attacks to complete the usual creationist modus operandi.
I have to agree with Thaum and Molal, as a geologist I was initially intrigued by his use of high falutin' geological terms, but it has all turned into hot air and fairy dust. It was obvious from the word go that his source of flood water would not fly as a working hypothesis, no method of extraction to earths surface, no way of dissipating massive heat that would have destroyed all life on earth, no way of putting water back into the mantle.
I suppose he didn't realise he would be dealing with real earth scientists on this board and he thought he might blind a few people with science by throwing around words that appear to show he has knowledge but often appear to have been put in at random, LREE is one example.
Then when he is called to task to explain himself he resorts to insulting people as we see above.
A fairly instructive thread for lurkers that shows that even when creationists appear to be learned in a field it is often all smoke and mirrors.
Hey, Molal, you lost two rounds in the debates on OT forum. You did not even dare to give ONE response to my third challenge. What can you do? Only put junks into argument to disguise your ignorance?I still find it ironic that Juvenissun is up against three practicing geologists, With a good spread of discipline and knowledge.
All I want is for him to flesh out his ideas, and provide some evidence.
Base on what you said here, you are not a scientist.I am sorry that were unable to deal with the details of your own hypothesis.
So, how about you flesh out your ideas and provide some evidence instead of derogatory comments?Hey, Molal, you lost two rounds in the debates on OT forum. You did not even dare to give ONE response to my third challenge. What can you do? Only put junks into argument to disguise your ignorance?
You are no scientist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?