Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually, evolution is essentially a fact. It is based on an overwhelming collection of evidence collected over centuries. The discoveries of every science confirm it's veracity.Obviously you are basing that totally on opinion. Creationism has many interpretations as well. You being a believer I find that a little weird, you don't believe that God created the universe?
I believe in God and I also know that evolution is a fact, put the two together and I believe that God must have used evolution, as for the universe I am torn between reality and my belief in God.You being a believer I find that a little weird, you don't believe that God created the universe?
Actually, evolution is essentially a fact. It is based on an overwhelming collection of evidence collected over centuries. The discoveries of every science confirm it's veracity.
Creationism on the other hand has zero evidence. The only "evidence" I have ever seen presented is finding things science can't explain, and thus claiming god must have done it. That makes no sense, you might as well thus claim that Santa Claus did it.
I believe in God and I also know that evolution is a fact, put the two together and I believe that God must have used evolution, as for the universe I am torn between reality and my belief in God.
I was subjected to a small amount of fear when I was young but no where near as much as creationists must have been.
With Christianity on a scale of 1 to 10 with creationists being 10, I am about a 4, if I was told that to be a Christian I must believe like a creationist I would rather be an Atheist, in my book creationism is denial taken to extremes.
Actually, evolution is essentially a fact. It is based on an overwhelming collection of evidence collected over centuries. The discoveries of every science confirm it's veracity.
Creationism on the other hand has zero evidence. The only "evidence" I have ever seen presented is finding things science can't explain, and thus claiming god must have done it. That makes no sense, you might as well thus claim that Santa Claus did it.
How can evolution oppose an idea?Evolution is not an either or proposition. Evolution is not something that is opposing creation.
Evolution's evidence opposes nothing, it's just there.Evolution's evidence is not evidence against creation.
You will need to produce this evidence if you wish to be taken seriously.Creation has evidence that supports it.
No it's not, it requires a supernatural being, tell us what the supernatural is and we might get somewhere.Creation is a very consistent and logical position compared to naturalism.
How can evolution oppose an idea?
Evolution's evidence opposes nothing, it's just there.
You will need to produce this evidence if you wish to be taken seriously.
No it's not, it requires a supernatural being, tell us what the supernatural is and we might get somewhere.
What is the 'Supernatural' and how do you know it exists?
We will leave 'What is a God' for another time.
You said that evolution has evidence and Creation has none so you are the one opposing them. On one hand you claim one has evidence and the other doesn't. That is opposing positions in your claim.
Yes, and evolution is not to be a belief system but it turns out to be the case more than not.
If you are claiming to be a believer you would know what supernatural is. So I must assume that you are really not a believer. So why the deceit?
You are conflating evolution, which is a fact and the theory of evolution. Here is an easy fix for you, switch "gravity" for "evolution" in the previous sentence. You can see how the theory of gravity might oppose some ideas where gravity itself does not.
Again, this can be cleared up by substituting the word "gravity". Is gravity a belief system? I don't think so.
Now how would you know that? There are thousands of different cults of Christianity. They have many different beliefs. This sounds like a variation of the "No true Scotsman Fallacy".
Oncedeceived, the fact that there is not scientific evidence that supports creationism is the fault of creationists, not evolutionists.
It looks like you are another creationist that needs to learn what is and is not scientific evidence.
There is plenty of evidence that supports Creation.
Well then my fellow believer you have a journey ahead of you. Evolution is not opposing creation. Reality, the universe points to God. The evidence is there for His creation of the universe. It is scientific and it is reasonable. I hope that your mind will be changed.
Very very weak evidence. And there is, by definition, no scientific evidence that supports creationism.
I think this is where you started to go off the rails.
You keep making unsupported claims, even when challenged to find some support.
How does the "universe point to God"? That is a extraordinary claim and as you should know requires extraordinary evidence.
And as discussed earlier your evidence cannot be scientific evidence. That is a special class of evidence with a special definition.
That is simply false.
1. Universe has a beginning.
2. Universe is expanding.
3. Laws governing the universe
4. Constants being precisely tuned to life.
5. Origins of life is more cohesive and rational in the Creation Model.
6. Intelligence is more cohesive and has more explanatory power than evolution.
7. Information in the system is more in line with intelligent design than mindless evolutionary processes.
The fact that the universal constants are so precise that life could not have arisen is evidence to support design. Those constants and their precise measurements are scientific and testable.
No, it is clearly true. Your silly post has nothing to do with whether or not creatioinism has any scientific evidence that supports it. You do not know what scientific evidence is.
But let's look at your claim:
1. Maybe. To be honest the Big Bang is as far back as we can go theoretically right now. That does not mean that was when the universe started. Second, even if it is that is not evidence for god even, and it definitely is not evidence for creationism.
2. Yes. So what?
3. It would be better to say that the universe reacts in predictable ways.
5. Nope. Not even close.
6. Definitely not.
7. Another foolish unsupported claim
Is that all you have is a bunch of fail to oppose me? That was so poor it can be denied with the wave of a hand. Claims made without any evidence can be denied without any evidence.
Meanwhile I am ready to support my claims.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?