Wiccan_Child
Contributor
- Mar 21, 2005
- 19,419
- 673
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
False. QV Relativity and quantum mechanics.Entirely based on Faith.
Nothing can occur that is not sourced by something equal or greater.
It's the law.
Conservation of energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's Three Laws of Motion
Wikipedia is not nature, just as the Koran is not God. Try again.
Last edited by Doveaman; 23rd October 2011 at 03:17 PM.
The effects of God-Energy have been physically observed. He is called "Spirit" because He hasn't been seen physically in the electromagnetic spectrum. A person can feel and observe the effects of "wind". Have you ever seen wind? Have you ever seen gravity? Understand?The effects of Dark matter and energy have been physically observed. It's called "dark" because it hasn't been seen physically in the electromagnetic spectrum. A person can feel and observe the effects of "wind". Have you ever seen wind? Have you ever seen gravity? Understand?
The effects of God-Energy have been physically observed. He is called "Spirit" because He hasn't been seen physically in the electromagnetic spectrum. A person can feel and observe the effects of "wind". Have you ever seen wind? Have you ever seen gravity? Understand?
You and I experience God-Energy everyday, right? But we know nothing about this "dark" stuff. Why rely on the unknown even though what is known can account for all the observations? God-Energy is known. So let's remember Occam.
I reject your information in favor of my own:Your non-sequitor doesn't even try and address the information I have provided you.
My information explains that too.It explains how all the beings in the picture you posted were related.
Okay.Try at least to learn what is really going on before you respond to it in the future..
I reject your information in favor of my own:
The effects of God-Energy have been physically observed.
He is called "Spirit" because He hasn't been seen physically in the electromagnetic spectrum.
A person can feel and observe the effects of "wind". Have you ever seen wind?
Have you ever seen gravity?
You and I experience God-Energy everyday, right?
But we know nothing about this "dark" stuff.
Why rely on the unknown even though what is known can account for all the observations?
God-Energy is known.
You don't experience the "dark stuff" either. So?I don't experience this God-energy stuff...
I sure do.I think God-energy is for the Birds.... DOVEaman....Birds.... get it?
You don't experience the "dark stuff" either.
I sure do.
"Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them." (Matt 6:26).
Yup.This should be good.
If that makes you feel better.The correct word here is "Non-existent".
Seeing the effect is not the same as seeing the cause. You know that, right?Yep. You can see it every time you see clouds moving through the sky.
Yes. Gravity bends light so that you can see gravity.
OkayShow us the evidence.
And we know about God-Energy. We know that it is not charged, does not emit or absorb photons, and has mass. We know this because God-Energy bends light through gravity.Actually, yes we do. We know that it is not charged, does not emit or absorb photons, and has mass. We know this because dark matter bends light through gravity.
And we can actually map the location and density of God-Energy in the universe by observing the way light interacts with it.We can actually map the location and density of dark matter in the universe by observing the way light interacts with it.
God-Energy is observable, and has been observed. The same can not be said for this supposed "dark-energy".Dark matter is observable, and has been observed. The same can not be said for this supposed "God-Energy".
Seeing the effect is not the same as seeing the cause.
And we know about God-Energy. We know that it is not charged, does not emit or absorb photons, and has mass. We know this because God-Energy bends light through gravity.
And we can actually map the location and density of God-Energy in the universe by observing the way light interacts with it.
God-Energy is observable, and has been observed. The same can not be said for this supposed "dark-energy".
So rain clouds are wind? That's new. Thanks for the lesson.Wind is the movement of gasses in the atmosphere. Clouds are gas. They are water VAPOR. They are moving. That is wind.
The same experiments that support your claims.Please cite the experiments that support these claims.
I'd say it's refreshing to see an open-mind from one who floats amidst the Creationists and conspiracy theorists... but something tells me you're being sarcastic. Regardless, he's right: rain clouds are wind, since they are, and are formed by, segments of the atmosphere which move. If they didn't move, they wouldn't form.So rain clouds are wind? That's new. Thanks for the lesson.
It can also be unicorns and fairy dust. We say dark matter because we can see gravitation from matter which has no effect on EM radiation - i.e., dark matter. You say *ahem* "God-Energy" because that is your presupposed religious belief (notice that no scientist ever hailed from the ancient Dark Matter religion, nor prayed in Dark Matter churches*). No one says unicorns or fairy dust because they're so blatantly false. God, it seems, is the only myth left to be ridiculed - and his doom is swiftly coming.The same experiments that support your claims.
Since we can only observe the effects and not the cause, than that cause can be God-Energy instead of dark-fantasy.
Fine by me.I'd say it's refreshing to see an open-mind from one who floats amidst the Creationists and conspiracy theorists... but something tells me you're being sarcastic. Regardless, he's right: rain clouds are wind, since they are, and are formed by, segments of the atmosphere which move. If they didn't move, they wouldn't form.
After all this time you are still not aware we can see by faith?EDIT: It gets even better when I see you're still discussing 'seeing is believing', yet your faith icon is still 'Christian'.
Yup.It can also be unicorns and fairy dust.
Please be honest and admit you are not seeing “gravitation from matter”. This is an assumption.We say dark matter because we can see gravitation from matter which has no effect on EM radiation - i.e., dark matter.
We all have our presupposed beliefs.You say *ahem* "God-Energy" because that is your presupposed religious belief
If your community is giving glory to the creation rather than to the Creator, then it’s a religious community.(notice that no scientist ever hailed from the ancient Dark Matter religion, nor prayed in Dark Matter churches*).
Which reminds me of the "dark-mathemagic" that supposedly holds the universe together.No one says unicorns or fairy dust because they're so blatantly false.
I predict failure on your part.God, it seems, is the only myth left to be ridiculed - and his doom is swiftly coming.
Actually, I was thinking CERN or Fermilab were like Satan to your dark mythology.*If you say CERN or Fermilab are churches to dark matter, you just prove my point.
Since we can only observe the effects and not the cause, than that cause can be God-Energy instead of dark-fantasy.
Unless said Deity leaves a Note saying He did it.Just because a cause is not yet know doesn't mean we should assign a deity to it.
Correct, then there would be cause to consider that. Do you happen to have such a note?Unless said Deity leaves a Note saying He did it.
Yes -- and I'll bet you do too:Do you happen to have such a note?
That would indeed be nice. The first problem is that all that seems to exist are a bunch of different writings by men of antiquity. If I had to point to the first "modern" example it would probably be Zoroastrianism. Everything that followed seem to be variations on a theme. From Zoroastrianism to Scientology it all appears to be the same supernatural "god of the gaps" type belief system. No matter where you place the needle on the record of theism it all sounds the same.Unless said Deity leaves a Note saying He did it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?