Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Some Evangelical Leaders Speaking Out Against Separating Child/Parent Migrates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotreDame" data-source="post: 72810060" data-attributes="member: 212558"><p>I said:”And there’s nothing “harsh,” much less “needlessly” in charging someone with a crime when illegal conduct has been perpetuated.”</p><p></p><p>I need to validate this negative of the claim you made? You can’t even demonstrate the conduct is harsh and I’m to show the negative of your unsupported claim is true?</p><p></p><p>Charging someone with a crime, when there is PC to believe the crime is committed, is an integral part of maintaining an orderly society. Law enforcement and prosecutors exist for the very purpose of enforcing criminal laws and prosecuting violators. Prosecutors and law enforcement facilitate an orderly society by arresting, charging, and prosecuting people where PC exists to believe they of committed a crime.</p><p></p><p>If charging someone with a crime where PC exists is “harsh,” or presumed harsh, then neither law enforcement or the prosecutor can perform their jobs, enforce the laws, or protect society and order in society. It’s not harsh to charge someone with a crime where PC exists to believe they committed the offense.</p><p></p><p>In regards to immigration, an orderly process for entering the country is essential as it protects society. A step to enforcing immigration law, to enforcing orderly and lawful entry, to protecting society, is prosecuting violators. Doing so isn’t harsh and I’ve read no argument and seen no evidence it’s harsh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotreDame, post: 72810060, member: 212558"] I said:”And there’s nothing “harsh,” much less “needlessly” in charging someone with a crime when illegal conduct has been perpetuated.” I need to validate this negative of the claim you made? You can’t even demonstrate the conduct is harsh and I’m to show the negative of your unsupported claim is true? Charging someone with a crime, when there is PC to believe the crime is committed, is an integral part of maintaining an orderly society. Law enforcement and prosecutors exist for the very purpose of enforcing criminal laws and prosecuting violators. Prosecutors and law enforcement facilitate an orderly society by arresting, charging, and prosecuting people where PC exists to believe they of committed a crime. If charging someone with a crime where PC exists is “harsh,” or presumed harsh, then neither law enforcement or the prosecutor can perform their jobs, enforce the laws, or protect society and order in society. It’s not harsh to charge someone with a crime where PC exists to believe they committed the offense. In regards to immigration, an orderly process for entering the country is essential as it protects society. A step to enforcing immigration law, to enforcing orderly and lawful entry, to protecting society, is prosecuting violators. Doing so isn’t harsh and I’ve read no argument and seen no evidence it’s harsh. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Some Evangelical Leaders Speaking Out Against Separating Child/Parent Migrates
Top
Bottom