Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Socialised Medicine ...... Arrrrgh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteveNZ" data-source="post: 66871769" data-attributes="member: 295028"><p>Hi Joykins,</p><p>Is there such a thing as poor insurance cover. Is there a standard minimum expectation of cover or can folk get quite limited cover if they choose.</p><p></p><p>Hmmm .......... in the US would it work better having compulsory insurance for major medical but not basic. I am thinking along the lines that folk can choose to insure against basic care (or fund it themselves) but have compulsory cover if they need extreme care.</p><p></p><p>The idea that say 70% of care is basic (the Dr/nurse you see can have power to decide 'no this is major') and the expensive, not as common items therefore less called on are enforced. It would be hard to abuse (even sincerely) the system that way and using expensive resources out of place. </p><p></p><p>*I am still in favour of total protection but everyone must fund it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteveNZ, post: 66871769, member: 295028"] Hi Joykins, Is there such a thing as poor insurance cover. Is there a standard minimum expectation of cover or can folk get quite limited cover if they choose. Hmmm .......... in the US would it work better having compulsory insurance for major medical but not basic. I am thinking along the lines that folk can choose to insure against basic care (or fund it themselves) but have compulsory cover if they need extreme care. The idea that say 70% of care is basic (the Dr/nurse you see can have power to decide 'no this is major') and the expensive, not as common items therefore less called on are enforced. It would be hard to abuse (even sincerely) the system that way and using expensive resources out of place. *I am still in favour of total protection but everyone must fund it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Socialised Medicine ...... Arrrrgh
Top
Bottom