I understand perfectly what I said. What you wrote does not have the same meaning as my original statement.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I understand perfectly what I said. What you wrote does not have the same meaning as my original statement.If you understood what you were saying, you would have said "your arguments have been contextualized in a way a child could understand - I forgive you, but you are going to have to study what has been said or how or why, before we can go any further"
I understand perfectly what I said. What you wrote does not have the same meaning as my original statement.
Your arguments have been refuted in every thread in which they appear.
No, that is not how genetics work. Please, just try to learn something about the subject that you constantly mangle here.That doesn't follow.
If I have a child out of a desire to be as instinctive as possible, that child will be born with a greater aptitude for "instinct".
You are saying, "there is no instinct, encoded in the DNA" yet every creature born, is born with some kind of instinct.
Yes, really.Really?
Firstly, the comment was directed to a different user, not you. Secondly, if you know anything about the user to whom the comment was directed you would know that the comment is accurate.You said:
As if their appearance is what was wrong with them (those arguments), not having quoted even one of them - for the sake of dignity?
If I have a child out of a desire to be as instinctive as possible, that child will be born with a greater aptitude for "instinct".
Thank you. You have just agreed that your only reason for thinking that some people believe "monkeys somehow know what they are evolving" is that you believe this. Do you understand why that makes little sense?The transference of a belief in knowledge, to the object, as reinforcement, for a proposed theory. Yes.
Rather , I think, the argument neglects everything true. Otherwise, no one would fall for it.The argument neglects one thing
Ummm . . . no. Evolution is a "one way street". Now could other intelligent simians have evolved? Yes, but we know that did not happen. Your OP appears to be rather pointless.I'm just taking the assertion, at face value.
If monkeys can evolve humans, different monkeys can evolve different humans.
It's like the most basic interpretation, you can imagine?
Your views have been refuted time and time again by several members. The lying referred to by Bungle Bear is your persistent denial of this obvious fact. Apparently persistent lying is acceptable on CF if practised by someone who self identifies as Christian even though several of their beliefs are unknown in any Christian denomination.
For your convenience the Report button can be found below and to the left.
Do you understand that Jehovah doesn't like your behaviour?
If you understood what you were saying, you would have said "your arguments have been contextualized in a way a child could understand - I forgive you, but you are going to have to study what has been said or how or why, before we can go any further"
Actually, that is a good question: how would you explain "Evolution" to a child?
Yes, I know it is. But when I weigh up my ethical commitment to truth against the TOS of this forum, I find my commitment to truth outweighs my obligation to the forum and therefore find it necessary to repeat that you are lying and you have done it again here.I am sorry that you seem to wish to remain frustrated, without posting a single refute of any of my posts. Big hat, no cattle. I will give you a C for trying to camouflage your thinking but calling someone else a liar, is against TOS.
You quote the verse I posted, then ask me how I know he dislikes your dishonesty? Just as a reminder, the verse is Proverbs 12:22. It's in your bibleHow would you know? It's obvious that you don't even know who He is.
Ignoring what others have told you already is discourteous:Guys, guys, guys: don't let this thread be shut down.
I think an interesting direction we could take the conversation is this: God creates by placing the things He creates in relationship with one another (the lion he puts in Africa, the bear he puts in the woodlands of America, the Tasmanian tiger he puts in Australia); what is it about Evolution, that differs from this model of placing things in their proper environment? How does "just evolving" learn from its environment in order to create creatures that know what they are evolving for?
Selection doesn't work by derivation, so animals had to have some sort of instinct, for them to evolve appropriately - what would that instinct have been?
Ignoring what others have told you already is discourteous:
1. Creatures (why are you precluding plants and other organisms from this thread? do not "know what they are evolving for.
2. No animal (or other organism) has an instinct to evolve, they simply try their best to survive. The one's that survive get to procreate - that's how evolution works.
Please explain, then, why 99% of organisms that have ever existed are now extinct.Yes but the ones with instinct, evolve the right way.
You don't see Evolution weeding out, that which does not know to evolve the right way?
And there's another thing you've been told and are ignoring - individuals do not evolve, populations evolve.Whether or not you think my instinct for understanding Evolution is interesting or not, you are not explaining what instinct I am supposed to have and you are getting in the way of my adapting, by insisting that I understand the connection between ape and human fossils.
Do you believe animals and humans are conscious and in control of the molecular processes going on in our bodies, and choose these processes? I can’t even choose the gender of my baby but you think I can choose my descendants’ mutations?It's just a fact, if you have what survives, and you want something new (regardless), you have to give up what you had - if you give up what you have had and you are human (with the knowledge of good and evil) your only alternative is to believe, that is, in the transference of one property to another, that the preceeding somehow wants it to happen (because if they did not want it to happen, in principle, it wouldn't). Moreover, maintaining this position, that apes can somehow reject what they have been in favour of becoming something better, diminishes the possibility that it is anything other than knowledge you think you have.
Do you believe animals and humans are conscious and in control of the molecular processes going on in our bodies, and choose these processes? I can’t even choose the gender of my baby but you think I can choose my descendants’ mutations?
Please explain, then, why 99% of organisms that have ever existed are now extinct.
And there's another thing you've been told and are ignoring - individuals do not evolve, populations evolve.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?